Advertisement

Incoming Labor-Product Society and EU Regional Policy

  • Martino Lo Cascio
  • Massimo Bagarani
Conference paper

Abstract

This contribute moves from a tentative of labor product taxonomy as opposed to mainstream labor factor, or human capital theory of production. We assume that labor is a product in all those cases where the trade-off between labor and capital blurs: in the case of high and medium-high technology workers, social economy enterprises, self-employment, “social-ethic” and no profit activities, but also in the case of smart entrepreneurship, especially in high and medium high technological sectors, such us start up enterprises. Aim of this paper is to improve analyses and implications of the changes in the EU NUTS 1 regions due to the diffusion of the information/knowledge society. We enlarge the Ex-post Myopic Convergence Model (EMCM) explaining the relative rate of productivity of EU NUTS1 regions, with the inclusion of a new exogenous variable, the share of labor-product on total employment (HTC/Total employment). Coexisting labor product-labor factor interaction in time and by regions, a Labor product-labor factor Interaction Model (LIM) has been specified and quantified starting from the Stone-Ramsey principle. The range of a possible future evolution of the interregional labor division between information technology and digital divide concludes the work.

JEL

O47 J24 J82 J88 

References

  1. Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, (99), 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arthur, W. B. (2013). Complexity economics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barro, R., & Sala i Martín, X. (1997). Technological diffusion, convergence, and growth. NBER, WP (5151).Google Scholar
  4. Barro, R., & Sala i Martín, X. (2004). Economic growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. De la Fuente, A. (2001). On the source of convergence: A close look at the Spanish Regions. European Economic Review, (46), 569–599.Google Scholar
  6. European Commission. (2010). An agenda for new skills and jobs: A European contribution towards full employment. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2015). Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2016). Towards a European Pillar of Social Rights. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  9. Geary, R. C. (1950). A note on ‘A constant-utility index of the cost of living’. Review of Economic Studies, 18(2), 65–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hieronymi, O., & Lo Cascio, M. (2016). A new social market economy for the 21st century. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
  11. Lo Cascio, M., & Bagarani, M. (2017a). Inside the EU economic space: Ex-post convergence vs EMU-OCA challenges. In L. Paganetto (Ed.), Sustainable growth in EU—Challenges and solutions. Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Lo Cascio, M., & Bagarani, M. (2017b). Coesione? La politica regionale europea tra allargamento “centrifugo” e approfondimento “zoppo”. In L. Paganetto (Ed.), Unione Europea. 60 anni e un bivio, Rapporto del Gruppo dei 20. Eurolink University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lo Cascio, M., & Bagarani, M. (2018). Europe, “knowledge” driven or divided? In O. Hieronymi (Ed.), Quo vadis Europe. Where is Europe heading sixty years after the signature of the Rome Treaty on the European Economic Community. Geneva: Webster University.Google Scholar
  14. Lo Cascio, M., Bagarani, M., & Zampino, S. (2012). Economic space trajectory trough different regional growth model. In M. Bagarani (Ed.), Il governo delle Regioni e lo sviluppo economico. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso. Google Scholar
  15. Lucas, R. (1988). On the mechanism of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mankiw, G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 407–37.Google Scholar
  17. Mongelli, P. F. (2008, February). European economic and monetary integration, and the optimum currency area theory. Economic Papers, (302) (Brussels).Google Scholar
  18. Pulido, A., & Fontela, E. (2004). Principios del desarrollo económico sostenible. Fundation Iberdrova.Google Scholar
  19. Romer, P. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, (94), 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Rome “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly
  2. 2.“Guglielmo Marconi” UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations