Advertisement

Getting Out, Goethe, and Serendipitous Ethnography

  • Rebecca Crowther
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents fieldwork and the success of serendipitous ethnography in context. It further problematises traditional ethnographic methods in relation to this research project working with groups of people in natural spaces. This chapter introduces the diverse research case studies. Crowther details observant participation, happenings upon case studies, and access and involvement with case study groups before moving on to serendipitous ethnography and Goethean observation in this context. This refers to being with groups and utilising responsive and flexible methods whilst observing without ego. Within this chapter, Crowther speaks of the journey, the excursion, and the participation in activities as a primary means to understanding these experiences. She details alternative and organic methods and why serendipitous ethnography is a necessary methodological framework within this research context.

References

  1. Bachelard, G. (1969/1984). The Poetics of Reverie – Childhood, Language and the Cosmos. Boston: Beacon Press Books.Google Scholar
  2. Berleant, A. (1992). The Aesthetics of Environment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bion, W. (1970). Attention and Interpretation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  4. Bird-Rose, D. (2013). Val Plumwood’s Philosophical Animism: Attentive Interactions in the Sentient World. Environmental Humanities, 3, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloch, M. (2012). Anthropology and the Cognitive Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpiano, R. M. (2009). Come Take a Walk with Me: The “Go-Along” Interview as a Novel Method for Studying the Implications of Place and Health in Wellbeing. Health and Place, 15, 263–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. London: Rider/Random House.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, D. (2007, October). Science and Serendipity: Reflections on an Anthropological Career. 55th Annual Harrington Lecture (pp. 1–27). Vermillion: The University of South Dakota.Google Scholar
  9. Fetterman, D. M. (2010). Ethnography: Step-by-Step. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Geertz, C. (2008). Deep Hanging Out. The New York Review of Books, 45(16), 69–72.Google Scholar
  11. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Hawthorne: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  12. Greverus, I. M. (2002). Anthropological Voyage of Serendipity and Deep Clues. Anthropological Journal on European Cultures, 11, 9–50. Shifting Grounds: Experiments in Doing Ethnography. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43234893
  13. Hazan and Hertzog. (2012). Serendipity in Anthropological Research: The Nomadic Turn. Oxon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Herzfeld, M. (2012). Chapter Five: Passionate Serendipity: From the Acropolis to the Golden Mount. In A. Gottlieb (Ed.), The Restless Anthropologist: New Field Sites, New Visions (pp. 100–122). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Ingold, T. (2010). Footprints Through the Weather-World: Walking, Breathing, Knowing. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16, s121–s139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ingold, T. (2018). Anthropology and/as Education. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Kahneman, D., & Riis, J. (2005). Living and Thinking About It: Two Perspectives on Life. In N. Baylis, F. A. Huppert, & B. Keverne (Eds.), The Science of Well-Being (pp. 285–301). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kusenbach, M. (2003, January). Street-Phenomenology: The Go-Along as Ethnographic Research Tool. PhD Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
  19. Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Oxon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Le Courant, S. (2013). What Can We Learn from a ‘Liar’ and a ‘Madman’? Serendipity and Double Commitment During Fieldwork. Young Scholars Forum. Social Anthropology, 21(2), 186–198.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis, N. (2000). The Climbing Body, Nature and the Experience of Modernity. Body and Society, 6(3–4), 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Madden, R. (2013). Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Moeran, B. (2007). From Participant Observation to Observant Participation: Anthropology, Fieldwork and Organisational Ethnography. Creative Encounters Working Papers. No. 2 (pp. 1–25). Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
  24. Philo, C. (2003). ‘To Go Back Up the Side Hill’: Memory, Imaginations and Reveries of Childhood. Children’s Geographies, 1(1), 7–23. Carlax Publishing Group.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1473328022000041634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pinder, R. (2007). On Movement and Stillness. Ethnography, 8(1), 99–116.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138107076142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rivioal, I., & Salazar, N. B. (2013). Contemporary Ethnographic Practice and the Value of Serendipity. Young Scholars Forum. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 1(2), 178–185.Google Scholar
  27. Rousseau, J. J. (1783/2011). Reveries of a Solitary Walker: A New Translation by Russell Goulborne. Oxford: Oxford World Classics, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Russell, A. W., Wickson, F., & Carew, A. L. (2007). Transdisciplinarity: Context, Contradiction and Capacity. Futures, 40, 460–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.10.005, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: A New Understanding of Happiness and Wellbeing – And How to Achieve Them. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Senda-Cook, S. (2012). Rugged Practices: Embodying Authenticity in Outdoor Recreation. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 98(2), 129–152.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2012.663500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tuan, Y. F. (1979). Space and Place. London: Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  32. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental Sequence in Small Groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turner, V. (1969). The Ritual Process – Structure and Anti-Structure. Suffolk: Richard Clay (The Chaucer Press Ltd).Google Scholar
  34. Turner, V. (1970). The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithica: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  36. von Goethe, J. W. (1790/2009). The Metamorphosis of Plants (trans: Miller, G. L.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. von Goethe, J. W. (2010/1823). The Experiment as Mediator of Object and Subject. In Context 24, 19–23, The Nature Institute.Google Scholar
  38. Wilkinson, C. (2017). Going ‘Backstage’: Observant Participation in Research with Young People. Children’s Geographies, 15(5), 614–620.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2017.1290924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca Crowther
    • 1
  1. 1.University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations