Advertisement

A Transdisciplinary Ethnography

  • Rebecca Crowther
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on relationality and social performance. Here, Crowther focuses on how one might research a subject that crosses the cognitive, cultural, behavioural, social, and biological sciences. This chapter discusses ways of looking, framing, and how we might approach the intangible within these nature experiences. It draws on performance theory. Crowther discusses transdisciplinarity and the necessity to understand across and between disciplines: she comprehends personal narratives and the abstraction of ideas and how these may be reached by an ethnographer. She problematises notions of clearly defined methods within ethnographic research. Here Crowther outlines her serendipitous ethnography. By approaching the field in such a manner, prominent themes emerge, and we move closer to understanding why shared nature excursions may be considered as transformational.

References

  1. Bell, S. L., Phoenix, C., Lovell, R., & Wheeler, B. W. (2015). Seeking Everyday Wellbeing: The Coast as Therapeutic Landscape. Social Science and Medicine, 142, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennet, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bloch, M. (2012). Anthropology and the Cognitive Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Callon, M., Law, J., & Rip, A. (1986). Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carrier, J. (2001). Social Aspects of Abstraction. Social Anthropology, 9(3), 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cerulo, K. A. (2009). Nonhumans in Social Interaction. The Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 531–552.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conradson, D. (2005). Landscape Care and the Relational Self: Therapeutic Encounters in Rural England. Health and Place, 11, 337–348.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duerden, F. (1978). Rambling Complete. London: Kay and Ward.Google Scholar
  10. Edensor, T. (2000). Walking in the British Countryside: Reflexivity, Embodied Practices and Ways to Escape. Body and Society, 6(3–4), 81–106.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X00006003005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goffman, I. (1956). The Presentation of the Self in Everyday Life. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Horlick-Jones, T., & Sime, J. (2004). Living on the Border: Knowledge, Risk and Transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36, 441–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ingold, T. (2004). Culture on the Ground: The World Perceived Through the Feet. Journal of Material Culture, 9(3), 315–340.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183504046896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ingold, T. (2010). Footprints Through the Weather-World: Walking, Breathing, Knowing. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 16, s121–s139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingold, T. (2015, May). Anti-disciplinary Interdisciplinarity. Seminar given at Scottish Training in Anthropological Research. The Burn, Aberdeenshire.Google Scholar
  16. Ingold, T. (2018). Anthropology and/ as Education. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Kay, G., & Moxham, N. (1996). Paths for Whom? Countryside Access for Recreational Walking. Leisure Studies, 15(3), 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Latour. (1986). The Power of Associations. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociological Knowledge? (pp. 264–280). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  19. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Latour, B. (1996). On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications Plus More than a Few Complications. Soziale Welt, 47, 369–381. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40878163. Accessed 27 July 2017
  21. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Law, J. (1992). Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network: Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewis, N. (2000). The Climbing Body, Nature and the Experience of Modernity. Body and Society, 6(3–4), 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mead, G. H. (1934). The Social Self in Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Morris, N. J. (2003, July). Health, Well-Being and Open Space: Literature Review. OPENspace. Edinburgh College of Art (Report).Google Scholar
  26. Morris, N. J. (2009). Naked in Nature: Naturism, Nature and the Senses in Early 20th Century Britain. Cultural Geographies, 16, 283–308.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474009105049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pink, S. (2008). An Urban Tour: The Sensory Sociality of Ethnographic Place-Making. Ethnography, 9(2), 175–196.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108089467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quay, J. (2013). More than Relations Between Self, Others and Nature: Outdoor Education and Aesthetic Experience. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 13(2), 142–157.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2012.746846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Russell, A. W., Wickson, F., & Carew, A. L. (2007). Transdisciplinarity: Context, Contradiction and Capacity. Futures, 40, 460–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schechner, R. (1988). Performance Theory. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Schechner, R. (1995). The Future of Ritual: Writings on Culture and Performance. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Strawson, G. (2005). Against Narrativity. In G. Strawson (Ed.), The Self? Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Takano, T. (2005). Connections with the Land: Land Skills Courses in Igloolik, Nunavut. Ethnography, 6(4), 463–486.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138105062472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thompson Klein, J. (2004). Prospects for Transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36, 515–526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Turner, V. (1987). The Anthropology of Performance. London: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
  37. Vergunst, J. (2013). Scottish Land Reform and the Idea of ‘Outdoors’. Ethnos, 78(1), 121–146.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2012.688759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vergunst, J., & Arnason, A. (2012). Introduction: Routing Landscape: Ethnographic Studies of Movement and Journeying. Landscape Research, 37(2), 147–154.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2012.669955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vergunst, J., & Vermehren, A. (2012). The Art of Slow Sociality: Movement, Aesthetics and Shared Understanding. Cambridge Anthropology, 30(2), 127–142.  https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2012.300111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wallace, A. (1993). Walking, Literature and English Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca Crowther
    • 1
  1. 1.University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations