The Forecast of the Structural Surfaces Along the Top of the Pre-Jurassic Base on the Gravitational Field and the Evaluation of Productivity in the Poorly Studied Regions of Western Siberia at Various Stages of Work

  • N. N. YaitskiiEmail author
  • I. I. Khaliulin
  • M. V. Melnikova
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences book series (SPEES)


The principal possibility and necessity of using the method of correlation separation of the gravitational field for the prediction of the structural plan of the foundation roof in poorly studied territories. Based on the results of the studies conducted in the poorly studied areas of Western Siberia, promising areas were identified, within which the subsequent drilling operations opened hydrocarbon deposits and proved the prospects of new areas. The further use of the similar studies allows us to hope for the discovery of new oil and gas fields in poorly studied areas of the AP.


Gravity prospecting Magnetic prospecting Integration of geophysical methods Seismic survey 


  1. Berezkin V.M. (2002) The full gradient for geophizical work – M: Nedra, 1988. – 188 c.Google Scholar
  2. Gemini MT, Menshikov Yu.P. "Bright spot" in the Lower Cretaceous deposits of the Shaim oil and gas bearing region of Western Siberia "Geophysics No. 4, 2002 M.Google Scholar
  3. Kosarev I.V., Gerasimova E.V. (2000) Integration of geological and geophysical information and data on the morphology of the modern relief with the purpose of forecasting buried uplifts // Sb. “Geology, drilling, development and operation of gas and gas condensate fields”. The gas industry, No. 5, M., 2000. p. 3-6.Google Scholar
  4. Segal Yu.Z., Yaitskiy N.N., Pyanov S.N. (1996) “Local forecast of hydrocarbon deposits in poorly studied regions” Geophysics No. 2 for 1996.Google Scholar
  5. Smirnov V.G. (1970) Anomalies of gravitational and magnetic fields as search criteria for the structures of the cover of the West Siberian plate within the boundaries of the Tyumen region). - Tyumen, ZapSibNIGNI, 1970. P. 3–10.Google Scholar
  6. Shraybman V.I., Zhdanov M.S., Vitvitsky O.V. (1977) Correlation methods of transformation and interpretation of geophysical anomalies. M., Nedra, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. Shraybman V.I., Zhdanov M.S., Vitvitsky O.V. (1980) Complex interpretation of field geophysics data, based on correlation transformations. - Geology of oil and gas, 1980, №7.Google Scholar
  8. Shraybman V.I., Fuchs I.B., Vitvitsky O.V., Titkova N.G. (1984) Study of the geological structure of the southern part of the Siberian platform by correlation methods. - Geology of oil and gas, 1984, №3.Google Scholar
  9. Shchekin S.N., Nezhdanov A.A., Turenkov N.A., Mikolaevsky E.Yu. (1998) “New methods for integrating geophysical methods in the Pangea system for forecasting oil and gas potential” Geophysics No. 6, 1998.Google Scholar
  10. Yaitskiy N.N., Segal Yu.Z. (2006) “Efficiency of joint interpretation of geological and geophysical information in poorly explored areas” Geophysics No. 1, 2006.Google Scholar
  11. Yaitskiy N.N. (2010) Forecast of the structural plan of the roof of the pre-Jurassic base in the Urals part of the AP on the gravitational field and the assessment of the prospects of oil and gas bearing on its basis // Tyumen, Gornye Vedomosti, 2010. №7. Pp. 52–59.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. N. Yaitskii
    • 1
    Email author
  • I. I. Khaliulin
    • 1
  • M. V. Melnikova
    • 1
  1. 1.Gazprom Geologorazvedka”TyumenRussia

Personalised recommendations