Advertisement

Multi-Electrode Electrical Profiling Results in the Northern Ladoga Area

  • V. E. KolesnikovEmail author
  • M. Yu. Nilov
  • A. A. Zhamaletdinov
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences book series (SPEES)

Abstract

DC electrical profiling with the use of Method of External Sliding Dipole (MESD) has been made along the profile Sevastyanovo-Hijtola-Sujstamo of 200 km length. The profile crosses the Ladoga anomaly of high conductivity. Interpretation of MESD results is performed in two stages. At the first stage, a one-dimensional inverse problem is solved using the Zohdy procedure (Zohdy 1989). The starting model is set in the form of a multilayered section with the number of layers equal to the number of deletions from the feeding line plus one (first) layer for the results of measurements inside the line. The depths to the base of the layers and their resistivity are taken equal to the corresponding values of the effective distances and to the apparent resistivity at corresponding distance. Further, an iterative selection of the theoretical model of the medium occurs before obtaining agreement with the experimental data within the error of observations. At the second stage, a quasi-2D section is constructed by symmetrically shifting the deep sounding centers with relation to the supply line AB to the southwest and northeast as the receiving dipoles MN move in opposite directions. The results of profiling, as well as the results of the study of samples from outcrops and boreholes, indicate the connection of anomalies with the presence of electron-conducting sulphide-carbonaceous rocks. Obviously, they explain the nature of the upper part of the regional Ladoga conductivity anomaly.

Keywords

Multi-electrode electromagnetic sounding DC resistivity method Modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by RFBR grant No 18-05-00528. Authors are thankful to A.A. Sko-rokhodov, A.N. Shevtsov and P.A. Ryazantsev for the help in the field work.

References

  1. Adam A., Kaikkonen P., Hjelt S.E., Pajunpaa K., Szarka L.,Vero J., Wallner A. (1982) Magnetotelluric and audiomagnetotellurics measurements in Finland. Tectonophysics 90, 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kaminsky A.E. (2010). ZondRes2D. Software for two-dimensional interpretation of DC re-sistivity and IP data. Zond Geophysical Software, Saint-Petersburg (Russia). 139 p.Google Scholar
  3. Kolesnikov V.E. (2016). Multi-electrode electrical exploration using the internal sliding contact technique - the experience of numerical 2D modeling. Seismic equipment 52 (3), 27–34.Google Scholar
  4. Kovtun A.A. (1989). The structure of the crust and upper mantle in the northwest of the East European Platform based on magnetotelluric sounding data. Leningrad University, Leningrad (USSR). 284 p.Google Scholar
  5. Kovtun A.A., Vardaniants I.L., Legenkova N.P., Smirnov M.Yu., Uspensky N.I. (2004). Features of the structure of the Karelian region according to geoelectric studies. Deep struc-ture and seismicity of the Karelo-Kola region and its surroundings. (edited by Sharov, N.V.).Karelian Science Center of RAS, Petrozavodsk (Russia). pp. 102–130.Google Scholar
  6. Lazareva N.V. (1967). Some features of natural electromagnetic field behaviour on the southern slope of the Baltic Shield. Issues of exploration geophysics 6. Nedra, Leningrad (USSR).Google Scholar
  7. Rokityansky I. I., Vasin N. D., Golod M. I., Novitsky G. P., Rokityanskaya D. A., Soko-lov S.Ya. (1979). Anomalies of electrical conductivity in the south of Karelia. Geophysical collection 89. Naukova dumka, Kiev (USSR). pp. 36–39.Google Scholar
  8. Sokolova E. Yu., Golubtsova N. S., Kovtun A. A. et al. (2016). Results of synchronous magnetotelluric and magnetovariational soundings in the area of the Ladoga electrical con-ductivity anomaly. Geophysics 1. pp. 48–61.Google Scholar
  9. Sviridenko L. P., Isanina E. V., Sharov N. V. (2017). The deep structure, volcanoplutonism and tectonics of the Ladoga area. Proceedings of the Karelian Research Center of RAS 2. Pe-trozavodsk (Russia). pp. 73–85.Google Scholar
  10. Vasin N.D. (1988). Geoelectric characteristics of the section of southwestern Karelia. Notes of Mining Institute. 113. pp. 57–63.Google Scholar
  11. Zhamaletdinov A.A., Ronning J.S., Vinogradov Yu.A. (1995). Electrical profiling by the MISC and Slingram methods in the Pechenga-Pasvik area. Norges Geologiske Undersokelse, Special publication 7. pp. 333–338.Google Scholar
  12. Zhamaletdinov A.A. (2012). Theory and methodology of deep electromagnetic soundings with powerful controlled sources (the experience of critical analysis). SPbSU, Saint-Petersburg (Russia). 163 p.Google Scholar
  13. Zohdy A.A.R. (1989). A new method for the automatic interpretation of Schlumberger and Wenner sounding curves. Geophysics 54 (2), 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. E. Kolesnikov
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Yu. Nilov
    • 2
  • A. A. Zhamaletdinov
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Geological Institute of the Kola Science Centre of RASApatityRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Geology of the Karelian Centre of RASPetrozavodskRussia
  3. 3.St. Petersburg Filial of IZMIRANSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations