Advertisement

The Future of Regulatory Capacity Building in the EU

  • Eva Heims
Chapter
Part of the Executive Politics and Governance book series (EXPOLGOV)

Abstract

The theoretical argument that this book developed in Chap.  2 was largely sustained in empirical analysis of four cases studies. Regulatory capacity in the EU is built despite the significant resource limitations faced by EU agencies and is based on inter-organisational relations between EU and national regulatory bodies. This mutual capacity building leads to a general enhancement of autonomy and influence of regulatory bodies vis-à-vis other government actors, and the chapter considers the implications of this for executive politics dynamics in the EU. It also discusses the UK’s exit from the EU. UK regulators have made a considerable contribution to EU capacity building, which implies that ‘Brexit’ is likely to be a lose-lose situation as far as regulatory capacity building is concerned.

Keywords

Inter-organisational relationships Autonomy Executive politics ‘Brexit’ 

References

  1. Bach, T., & Ruffing, E. (2013). Networking for Autonomy? National Agencies in European Networks. Public Administration, 91(3), 712–726.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, T. and Ruffing, E. 2018. The Transformative Effects of Transnational Administrative Coordination in the European Multi-Level SYSTEM. In E. Ongaro and S. van Thiel (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Public Management in Europe (pp. 747-763). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Bach, T., Ruffing, E., & Yesilkagit, K. (2015). The Differential Empowering Effects of Europeanization on the Autonomy of National Agencies. Governance, 28(3), 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barroso, L. (2011). The Problems and the Controls of the New Administrative State of the EU. Ph.D. Thesis, The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).Google Scholar
  5. Brehm, J. O., & Gates, S. (1997). Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  6. Busuioc, M. (2013). Rulemaking by the European Financial Supervisory Authorities: Walking a Tight Rope. European Law Journal, 19(1), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. COWI (Consultancy within Engineering, Environmental Science and Economics). (2008, April). EMSA Evaluation Report. Denmark.Google Scholar
  8. Danielsen, O. A., & Yesilkagit, K. (2014). The Effects of European Regulatory Networks on the Bureaucratic Autonomy of National Regulatory Authorities. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eberlein, B. (2008). The Making of the European Energy Market: The Interplay of Governance and Government. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eberlein, B., & Grande, E. (2005). Beyond Delegation: Transnational Regulatory Regimes and the EU Regulatory State. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(1), 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EFSA. (2017). Minutes of the 66th Meeting of the Advisory Forum. Parma: European Food Safety Authority.Google Scholar
  12. Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2009). National Agencies in the European Administrative Space: Government Driven, Commission Driven, or Networked? Public Administration, 87(4), 779–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2011). EU-Level Agencies: New Executive Centre Formation or Vehicles for National Control? Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 868–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2016). Why Strong Coordination at One Level of Government is Incompatible with Strong Coordination Across Levels (and How to Live With It). The Case of the European Union. Public Administration, 94(3), 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. EMSA. (2012, June 8). Administrative Board Meeting Minutes of the 33th Meeting. Lisbon: EMSA.Google Scholar
  16. Ernst and Young. (2017). External Evaluation of EFSA: Final Report. Last accessed in March 2018. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/efsa_rep/blobserver_assets/efsafinalreport.pdf.
  17. FSA. (2017). Annual Report and Accounts 2016–2017. London: Food Standards Agency.Google Scholar
  18. Groenleer, M., Kaeding, M., & Versluis, E. (2010). Regulatory Governance through Agencies of the European Union? The Role of the European Agencies for Aviation and Maritime Safety in the Implementation of European Transport Legislation. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(8), 1212–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hauray, B., & Urfalino, P. (2009). Mutual Transformation and the Development of European Policy Spaces: The Case of Medicines Licensing. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(3), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heims, E. M. (2018). Why Cooperation Between Agencies Is (Sometimes) Possible: Turf Protection as Enabler of Regulatory Cooperation in the European Union. In T. Bach & K. Wegrich (Eds.), The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non-Coordination. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Héritier, A., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2008). Introduction: The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  22. Joerges, C., & Neyer, J. (1997). From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalization of Comitology. European Law Journal, 3(3), 273–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelemen, D. R. (2002). The Politics of ‘Eurocratic’ Structure and the New European Agencies. West European Politics, 25(4), 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanisation of National Administrations: Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kreher, A. (1997). Agencies in the European Community—A Step towards Administrative Integration in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Le Den, X., Lessmann, F., Floristean, A., Blagoeva, T., Poteron, S., Ellegarrd, C., & Sandager Hansen, J. (2017). Evaluation on the Implementation of the Regulation (Ec) No 1406/2002 Establishing EMSA. Copenhagen: Ramboll.Google Scholar
  27. Maggetti, M. (2014). The Rewards of Cooperation: the Effects of Membership in European Regulatory Networks. European Journal of Political Research, 53(3), 480–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maggetti, M., & Gilardi, F. (2011). The Policy-Making Structure of European Regulatory Networks and the Domestic Adoption of Standards. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 830–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Majone, G. (1997). The New European Agencies: Regulation by Information. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 262–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken. (2013, June 21). Testing European Legislation for Subsidiarity and Proportionality—Dutch List of Points for Action. Policy note.Google Scholar
  31. Niskanen, W. A. (1994 [1971]). Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Brookfield: Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990). Policy Networks: A British Perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richardson, J. (Ed.). (1982). Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  34. Sabatier, P., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy Change and Learning. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  35. Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2010). Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  37. Van Boetzelaer, K., & Princen, S. (2012). The Quest for Co-ordination in European Regulatory Networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(5), 819–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wildavsky, A. (1994). Why Self-Interest Means Less Outside of a Social Context: Cultural Contributions to a Theory of Rational Choices. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(2), 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilks, S. (2005). Agency Escape: Decentralization or Dominance of the European Commission in the Modernization of Competition Policy? Governance, 18(3), 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson, J. Q. (2000 [1989]). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Heims
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations