Advertisement

Impact of Demographic Differences on Color Preferences in the Interface Design of e-Services in Latvia

  • Jurģis Šķilters
  • Līga Zariņa
  • Signe Bāliņa
  • Dace Baumgarte
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 838)

Abstract

In our study, we test users’ color preferences of interfaces of typical electronic services’ (e-services) environment. The motivation of our study is to explore discrepancy between (a) the high degree of availability of e-services in Latvia, and (b) low usage of these e-services among population. We aim to find the regularities regarding color preferences that could be useful in the development of e-services and that could support the rise of the usage of e-services in future. Although there are several reasons why people avoid using e-services (some of them socio-cognitive, some – technological), we would like to focus on a particular aspect – the colors of e-services interface. In particular, we test color preferences in respect to the interface depending on different demographic factors. Our hypothesis is that color contributes to the preference of using e-services and that such factors as gender, age, place of residence, education field, language knowledge, occupation, and hobbies determine the color preferences.

Keywords

Colors Demographic factors e-services Interfaces 

References

  1. 1.
    Grimes, A., Kitchen, P.J.: Researching mere exposure effects to advertising-theoretical foundations and methodological implications. Int. J. Res. Mark. 49(2), 191–219 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hartson, R., Pyla, P.S.: The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Holmes, K.J., Regier, T.: Categorical perception beyond the basic level: The case of warm and cool colors. Cogn. Sci. 41(4), 1135–1147 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nelson, R., Schloss, K.B., Parker, L., Palmer, S.E.: Color preference: seasonal and gender differences. J. Vision, 12, 72 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1167/12.9.72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ophir, E., Nass, C., Wagner, A.D.: Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 106(37), 15583–15587 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ou, L.C., Luo, M.R., Woodcock, A., Wright, A.: A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part I: colour emotions for single colours. Color Res. Appl. 29(3), 232–240 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ou, L.C., Luo, M.R., Woodcock, A., Wright, A.: A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part II: colour emotions for two-colour combinations. Color Res. Appl. 29(4), 292–298 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ou, L.C., Luo, M.R., Woodcock, A., Wright, A.: A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part III: colour preference modeling. Color Res. Appl. 29(5), 381–389 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palmer, S.E., Schloss, K.B.: An ecological valence theory of human color preference. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 107(19), 8877–8882 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raudonis, V., Maskeliūnas, R., Stankevičius, K., Damaševičius, R.: Gender, age, colour, position and stress: How they influence attention at workplace? In: International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, pp. 248–264 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schloss, K.B., Nelson, R., Parker, L., Heck, I.A., Palmer, S.E.: Seasonal variations in color preference. Cogn. Sci. 41(6), 1589–1612 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schloss, K.B., Palmer, S.E.: An ecological framework for temporal and individual differences in color preferences. Vis. Res. 141, 95–108 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2017.01.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taylor, C., Schloss, K., Palmer, S.E., Franklin, A.: Color preferences in infants and adults are different. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 20(5), 916–922 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Terwogt, M.M., Hoeksma, J.B.: Colors and emotions: preferences and combinations. J. Gen. Psychol. 122(1), 5–17 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zajonc, R.B.: Mere exposure: a gateway to the subliminal. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 10(6), 224–228 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zailskaitė-Jakštė, L., Ostreika, A., Jakštas, A., Stanevičienė, E., Damaševičius, R.: Brand communication in social media: the use of image colours in popular posts. In: Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics, pp. 1373–1378 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yokosawa, K., Schloss, K.B., Asano, M., Palmer, S.E.: Ecological effects in cross-cultural differences between US and Japanese color preferences. Cogn. Sci. 40(7), 1590–1616 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory for Perceptual and Cognitive Systems at the Faculty of ComputingUniversity of LatviaRigaLatvia
  2. 2.Faculty of Business, Management and EconomicsUniversity of LatviaRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations