Advertisement

A New Model for Lean and Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Optimization

  • Turan Paksoy
  • Ahmet Çalik
  • Alexander Kumpf
  • Gerhard Wilhelm Weber
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 273)

Abstract

The dynamics of Supply Chain Management (SCM) have changed over the years; new paradigms are added into the SCM as a response to changes related with increasing environmental concerns and pressures. Therefore, lean and green practices in a company belong to its most important factors to enhance the company’s performance. In this study a new model, inspired by an automotive supply chain, is proposed for lean and green closed-loop supply chain management. In this model, we deal with lean and green drivers to set the objectives of the decision makers (DMs) as follows; (1) Construction: The amount of emitted CO2 depends on the size of the potential facilities; (2) Production: Higher equipment or techniques in a production system means a higher environmental investment and leads to lower CO2 emissions; (3) Handling: The usage of a proper forklift is an important decision to increase the productivity and reduce CO2 emissions; (4) Transportation: Three different options in the transportation process which DMs can choose are considered: small-sized, medium-sized, and heavy-sized trucks. All of the truck types differ in transportation cost and CO2 emissions with respect to the engines. The benefits of the heavy-sized trucks are obvious: less transportation cost with bigger lot size deliveries but more environmental pollution as well; (v) On Time Deliveries: Lean manufacturing needs suppliers to comply with delivery times, which directly affect the buyer’s manufacturing lead times, operational performances and competitiveness. Thus, late deliveries of suppliers aimed to be minimized. Under these circumstances, there are few trade-offs which need to be optimized simultaneously. The developed model consists of six different objectives: minimization of transportation cost, purchasing and operational cost, fixed facility cost, environmental cost, handling cost and late deliveries. In order to validate the proposed model, a numerical example is implemented and analyzed by using fuzzy weighted additive method where the weights are determined via Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) method.

Keywords

Lean and green closed-loop supply chain management Carbon dioxide emission Multi-objective mixed-integer programming, Fuzzy weighted additive method, Fuzzy AHP Network design 

References

  1. Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., & Goyal, S. K. (2010). A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 370–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabral, I., Grilo, A., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2012). A decision-making model for Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 50(17), 4830–4845.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.657970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carvalho, H., Govindan, K., Azevedo, S. G., & Cruz-machado, V. (2017). Modelling green and lean supply chains: An eco-efficiency perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 75–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., & Dallari, F. (2017). Lean and green supply chain management through intermodal transport: Insights from the fast moving consumer goods industry. Production Planning & Control The Management of Operations, 28(4), 321–334.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1282642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duarte, S., & Cruz Machado, V. (2017). Green and lean implementation: An assessment in the automotive industry. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8(1), 65–88.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-11-2015-0041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duarte, S., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2013). Modelling lean and green: A review from business models. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 4(3), 228–250.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-05-2013-0030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emmett, S., & Sood, V. (2010). Green supply chains: An action manifesto. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Eshragh, A. (2015). A tradeoff model for green supply chain planning: A leanness-versus-greenness analysis. Omega (United Kingdom), 54, 173–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fercoq, A., Lamouri, S., & Carbone, V. (2016). Lean/Green integration focused on waste reduction techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 567–578.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garza-Reyes, J. A., Villarreal, B., Kumar, V., & Molina, P. (2016). Lean and green in the transport and logistics sector – A case study of simultaneous deployment. Production Planning & Control The Management of Operations, 27(15), 1221–1232.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2016.1197436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Golpîra, H., Najafi, E., Zandieh, M., & Sadi-nezhad, S. (2017). Robust bi-level optimization for green opportunistic supply chain network design problem against uncertainty and environmental risk. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 107, 301–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.03.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Govindan, K., Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2014). Impact of supply chain management practices on sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 212–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Govindan, K., Azevedo, S. G., Carvalho, H., & Cruz-Machado, V. (2015). Lean, green and resilient practices influence on supply chain performance: Interpretive structural modeling approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12(1), 15–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0409-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kannan, D., Diabat, A., Alrefaei, M., et al. (2012). A carbon footprint based reverse logistics network design model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 67, 75–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klufallah, M. M. A., Nuruddin, M. F., Khamidi, M. F., & Jamaludin, N. (2014). Assessment of carbon emission reduction for buildings projects in Malaysia – A comparative analysis. E3S Web Conferences.  https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20140301016. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martínez-Jurado, P. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2014). Lean management, supply chain management and sustainability: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 134–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mollenkopf, D., Stolze, H., Tate, W. L., & Ueltschy, M. (2010). Green, lean, and global supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(1/2), 14–41.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031011018028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rostamzadeh, R., Govindan, K., Esmaeili, A., & Sabaghi, M. (2015). Application of fuzzy VIKOR for evaluation of green supply chain management practices. Ecological Indicators, 49, 188–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Talaei, M., Farhang Moghaddam, B., Pishvaee, M. S., et al. (2016). A robust fuzzy optimization model for carbon-efficient closed-loop supply chain network design problem: A numerical illustration in electronics industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 113, 662–673.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tiwari, R. N., Dharmar, S., & Rao, J. R. (1987). Fuzzy goal programming – An additive model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 24(1), 27–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(87)90111-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2014). Draft U.S. Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2014. Executive Summary. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-04/documents/us-ghg-inventory-2016-main-text.pdf
  23. Ugarte, G. M., Golden, J. S., & Dooley, K. J. (2016). Lean versus green: The impact of lean logistics on greenhouse gas emissions in consumer goods supply chains. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 22(2), 98–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2015.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Verrier, B., Rose, B., & Caillaud, E. (2016). Lean and Green strategy: The Lean and Green House and maturity deployment model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 116, 150–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vlachos, I. (2015). Applying lean thinking in the food supply chains: A case study. Production Planning & Control The Management of Operations, 26, 1351–1367.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2015.1049238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang, F., Lai, X., & Shi, N. (2011). A multi-objective optimization for green supply chain network design. Decision Support Systems, 51, 262–269.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.11.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Turan Paksoy
    • 1
  • Ahmet Çalik
    • 2
  • Alexander Kumpf
    • 3
  • Gerhard Wilhelm Weber
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringKonya Technical UniversityKonyaTurkey
  2. 2.Department of International Trade and LogisticsKTO Karatay UniversityKonyaTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Logistics ManagementApplied Sciences University of LandshutMunichGermany
  4. 4.Faculty of Engineering ManagementChair of Marketing and Economic Engineering, Poznan University of TechnologyPoznanPoland
  5. 5.IAMMETUAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations