Draft Assembly of the F2 European Maize Genome Sequence and Its Comparison to the B73 Genome Sequence: A Characterization of Genotype-Specific Regions

  • Johann JoetsEmail author
  • Clémentine Vitte
  • Alain Charcosset
Part of the Compendium of Plant Genomes book series (CPG)


Maize is well known for its exceptional structural diversity, including copy number variants (CNVs) and presence/absence variants (PAVs), and there is growing evidence for the role of structural variation in maize adaptation. F2 is a European maize line resulting from a long-term independent evolution relative to the reference American line B73. It also presents strong heterosis when crossed to American lines related to B73 or PH207, which has been instrumental for the development of hybrid breeding in Northern Europe. De novo genome sequencing of the French F2 maize inbred line revealed 10,044 novel genomic regions larger than 1 kb, making up 88 MB of DNA, that are present in F2 but not in B73 (PAV). This set of maize PAV sequences allowed us to annotate PAV content and to identify 395 new genes. We showed that most of these genes display numerous features that suggest they are either rapidly evolving genes or lineage-specific genes. Using PAV genotyping on a collection of 25 temperate lines, we also analyzed and provided the first insights about PAV frequencies within maize genetic groups and linkage disequilibrium in PAVs and flanking regions. The pattern of linkage disequilibrium within PAVs strikingly differs from that of flanking regions and is in accordance with the intuition that PAVs may recombine less than other genomic regions. As it was shown by several other authors, most PAVs are ancient, while we show that some are found only in European Flint material, thus pinpointing structural features that may be at the origin of adaptive traits involved in the success of this material. We conclude by some words on future directions.


  1. Arendsee ZW, Li L, Wurtele E (2014) Coming of age: orphan genes in plants. 19:698–708. Scholar
  2. Beló A, Beatty MK, Hondred D et al (2010) Allelic genome structural variations in maize detected by array comparative genome hybridization. Theor Appl Genet 120:355–367. Scholar
  3. Bouchet S, Bertin P, Presterl T, Jamin P, Coubriche D, Gouesnard B, Laborde J, Charcosset A (2017) Association mapping for phenology and plant architecture in maize shows higher power for developmental traits compared with growth influenced traits. Heredity 118:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandenburg J-TT, Mary-Huard T, Rigaill G et al (2017) Independent introductions and admixtures have contributed to adaptation of European maize and its American counterparts. PLoS Genet 13:e1006666. Scholar
  5. Chia J-MM, Song C, Bradbury PJ et al (2012) Maize HapMap2 identifies extant variation from a genome in flux. Nat Genet 44:803–807. Scholar
  6. Cauderon A (INRA, ed) (2002) L’INRA dans l’amélioration des plantes des «Trente Glorieuses» à la lumière des préoccupations actuelles, in: L’Amélioration des Plantes, continuités et ruptures (
  7. Consortium CP-G (2016) Computational pan-genomics: status, promises and challenges. Brief Bioinform. Scholar
  8. Darracq A, Vitte C, Nicolas S, Duarte J, Pichon JP, Mary-Huard T, Chevalier C, Bérard A, Le Paslier MC, Rogowsky P, Charcosset A, Joets J (2018) Sequence analysis of European maize inbred line F2 provides new insights into molecular and chromosomal characteristics of presence/absence variants. BMC Genom 19:119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gouesnard B, Negro S, Laffray A, Glaubitz J, Melchinger A, Revilla P, Moreno-Gonzalez J, Madur D, Combes V, Tollon-Cordet C, Laborde J, Kermarrec D, Bauland C, Moreau L, Charcosset A, Nicolas S (2017) Genotyping-by-sequencing highlights original diversity patterns within a European collection of 1191 maize flint lines, as compared to the maize USDA genebank. Theor Appl Genet 130:2165–2189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hirsch C, Hirsch CD, Brohammer AB, et al (2016) Draft assembly of elite inbred line PH207 provides insights into genomic and transcriptome diversity in maize. Plant Cell 28:tpc.00353.2016.
  11. Hirsch CN, Foerster JM, Johnson JM, et al (2014) Insights into the maize pan-genome and pan-transcriptome. Plant Cell Online tpc.113.119982.
  12. Hurgobin B, Edwards D (2017) SNP discovery using a pangenome: has the single reference approach become obsolete? Biology 6:21. Scholar
  13. Lai J, Li R, Xu X et al (2010) Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation among elite maize inbred lines. Nat Genet 42:1027–1030. Scholar
  14. Schrider DR, Hahn MW (2010) Lower linkage disequilibrium at CNVs is due to both recurrent mutation and transposing duplications. Mol Biol Evol 27:103–111. Scholar
  15. Springer NM, Ying K, Fu Y, Ji T, Yeh C-T, Jia Y, Wu W, Richmond T, Kitzman J, Rosenbaum H, Iniguez LA, Barbazuk A, Jeddeloh JA, Nettleton D, Schnable PS, Ecker JR (2009) Maize inbreds exhibit high levels of copy number variation (cnv) and presence/absence variation (pav) in genome content. PLoS Gen 5(11):e1000734Google Scholar
  16. Swanson-Wagner RA, Eichten SR, Kumari S et al (2010) Pervasive gene content variation and copy number variation in maize and its undomesticated progenitor. Genome Res 20:1689–1699. Scholar
  17. Tenaillon MI, Charcosset A (2011) A European perspective on maize history. Comp Rendus Biol 334(3):221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johann Joets
    • 1
    Email author
  • Clémentine Vitte
    • 1
  • Alain Charcosset
    • 1
  1. 1.Genetique Quantitative et Evolution – Le MoulonINRA, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-SaclayGif-Sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations