Advertisement

“It’s Alive!” New Materialism and Literary Horror

  • Susan Yi Sencindiver
Chapter

Abstract

Pivoting on the primacy of matter as an underexplored question, both new materialist thought and literary horror’s predilection for probing lurid materialities provide ample purchase for rethinking the matter of matter. Drawing on new materialism to explore the matter in and of primarily nineteenth-century literary horror, this study, on the one hand, addresses the ways in which the sensuous dimensions and visceral immediacy of literary language may elicit the affective sensibilities of horror and, on the other hand, how horror subtly challenges an anthropocentric purview. It does so by accommodating the agentic thrust of nonhuman materialities in sculpting the events of the narrative, that is, by affirming the material agency of the body and natural environment, featuring a self-organizing life and impetus of their own.

Bibliography

  1. Alaimo, Stacy. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aldana Reyes, Xavier. 2015. Gothic Affect: An Alternative Approach to Critical Models of the Contemporary Gothic. In New Directions in 21st-Century Gothic: The Gothic Compass, ed. Lorna Piatti-Farnell and Donna Lee Brien, 11–23. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2016. Horror Film and Affect: Towards a Corporeal Model of Viewership. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Barad, Karen. 1998. Getting Real: Technoscientific Practices and the Materialization of Reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 10 (2): 87–128.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blackwood, Algernon. 1973. The Willows. In Best Ghost Stories of Algernon Blackwood, ed. E.F. Bleiler, 1–52. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2004. The Man Whom the Trees Loved. Urbana, IL: Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/11377/pg11377.html. Accessed May 10, 2017.
  9. Braidotti, Rosi. 2002. Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, Judith. 2006. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Colebrook, Claire. 2008. On Not Becoming Man: The Materialist Politics of Unactualized Potential. In Material Feminisms, ed. Stacy Alaimo and Susan J. Hekman, 52–84. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost. 2010. Introducing the New Materialisms. In New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, ed. Diana Coole and Samantha Frost, 1–43. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeLanda, Manuel. 2002. Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  14. Drobnick, Jim. 1998. Reveries, Assaults, and Evaporating Presences: Olfactory Dimensions in Contemporary Art. Parachute 89: 10–19.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2006. Introduction: Olfactocentrism. In The Smell Culture Reader, ed. Jim Drobnick, 1–12. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  16. Dufrenne, Mikel. 1973. The Phenomenology of Aesthetic Experience. Trans. Edward S. Casey et al. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Indianapolis: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gumbrecht, Hans. 2004. Production of Presence What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Halberstam, Judith. 1995. Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hanich, Julian. 2009. Dis/liking Disgust: The Revulsion Experience at the Movies. New Review of Film and Television Studies 7 (3): 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurley, Kelly. 1996. The Gothic Body: Sexuality, Materialism, and Degeneration at the Fin de Siècle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, Rochelle L. 2014. ‘This Enchantment Is No Delusion’: Henry David Thoreau, the New Materialisms, and Ineffable Materiality. Isle: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 21 (3): 606–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lewis, Matthew G. 1998. The Monk: A Romance. Ed. Christopher MacLachlan. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  26. Machen, Arthur. 1895. The Three Impostors or The Transmutations. London: John Lane.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2006. The Great God Pan and The Hill of Dreams. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
  28. Meyers, Chris, and Waller, Sara. 2001. Disenstoried Horror: Art Horror Without Narrative. Film and Philosophy: Special Edition on Horror, pp. 117–126.Google Scholar
  29. Moslund, Sten Pultz. 2015. Literature’s Sensuous Geographies: Postcolonial Matters of Place. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Navarette, Susan J. 1998. The Shape of Fear: Horror and the Fin de Siècle Culture of Decadence. University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  31. Poe, Edgar Allan. 1982. The Complete Tales and Poems of Edgar Allan Poe. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. Rindisbacher, Hans J. 1992. The Smell of Books: A Cultural-historical Study of Olfactory Perception in Literature. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1966. Being and Nothingness. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sencindiver, Susan Yi. 2014. The Doll’s Uncanny Soul. In The Gothic and the Everyday, ed. Maria Beville and Lorna Piatti-Farnell, 103–130. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Shelley, Mary. 1996. Frankenstein. Ed. J. Paul Hunter. London: Norton.Google Scholar
  36. Stevenson, Robert Louis. 2003. The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde and Other Tales of Terror. Ed. Robert Mighall. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. Tischleder, Babette Bärbel. 2014. The Literary Life of Things: Case Studies in American Fiction. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  38. Trumpeter, Kevin. 2015. The Language of the Stones: The Agency of the Inanimate in Literary Naturalism and the New Materialism. American Literature: A Journal of Literary History, Criticism, and Bibliography 87 (2): 225–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Uglioni, Luigi. 2011. The Vegetable Man. In The Weird: A Compendium of Strange and Dark Stories, ed. Jeff VanderMeer and Ann VanderMeer, 97–100. New York: Tom Doherty Associates.Google Scholar
  40. Wilde, Oscar. 1997. Collected Works of Oscar Wilde. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions.Google Scholar
  41. Wordsworth, William. 2000. Ode. Intimations of Immortality from Recollections of Early Childhood. In The Norton Anthology of English Literature, ed. M.H. Abrams, Stephen Greenblatt, et al., vol. 2, 7th ed., 287–292. London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Yi Sencindiver
    • 1
  1. 1.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations