Advertisement

Boundary Crossing and Cultural Creation: Transgressive Horror and Politics of the 1990s

  • Coco d’Hont
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores transgressive horror: a type of horror that crosses the boundaries that shape social order, not to destroy them but to critically interrogate them. It focuses on American transgressive horror of the 1990s, a decade during which horror studies, as well as gender and queer studies, gained prominence as academic disciplines. Not coincidentally, transgressive horror uses the violated body as a metaphorical space to interrogate the boundaries between high and low culture, mind and matter, and fiction and reality. Authors such as Bret Easton Ellis, Poppy Z. Brite, and Mark Z. Danielewski use familiar horror tropes, including the serial killer, the vampire, and the haunted house to analyze gender and sexuality as social constructions and draw connections between mainstream and margins.

Bibliography

  1. Auerbach, Nina. 1995. Our Vampires, Our Selves. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bataille, Georges. 1987. Eroticism. Trans. Mary Dalwood. London: Boyars.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, Vikki. 1993. Interrogating Incest: Feminism, Foucault and the Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bemong, Nele. 2003. Exploration #6: The Uncanny in Mark Z. Danielewski’s House of Leaves. Image & Narrative: Online Magazine of the Visual Narrative 5. http://www.imageandnarrative.be/inarchive/uncanny/nelebemong.htm. Accessed May 26, 2017.
  5. Brite, Poppy Z. 2010. Lost Souls. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Brummett, Barry. 1985. Electric Literature as Equipment for Living: Haunted House Films. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 2 (3): 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clover, Carol. 1992. Men, Women and Chain Saws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Danielewski, Mark Z. 2000. House of Leaves. 2nd ed. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  9. Edelman, Lee. 2004. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ellis, Bret Easton. 2011. American Psycho. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, Michel. 1977. A Preface to Transgression. In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, ed. Donald F. Bouchard, trans. Donald F. Bouchard and Sherry Simon, 29–53. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Freccero, Carla. 1997. Historical Violence, Censorship, and the Serial killer: The Case of American Psycho. Diacritics 27 (2): 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freud, Sigmund. 2003. The Uncanny. Trans. David McLintock. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Gittins, Diana. 1993. The Family in Question: Changing Households and Familiar Ideologies. 2nd ed. Houndmills: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamilton, Nathalie. 2008. The A-Mazing House: The Labyrinth as Theme and Form in Mark Z. Danielewski’s House of Leaves. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 50 (1): 3–16.Google Scholar
  16. Hayles, N. Katherine. 2002. Saving the Subject: Remediation in House of Leaves. American Literature 74 (4): 779–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koger, Grove. 2014. Haunted House. In The Ashgate Encyclopedia of Literary and Cinematic Monsters, ed. Jeffrey Andrew Weinstock, 317–320. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Marx, Karl. 1976. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume One. Trans. Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. McCaffery, Larry, and Sinda Gregory. 2003. Haunted House – An Interview with Mark Z. Danielewski. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 44 (2): 99–135.Google Scholar
  20. Nixon, Nicola. 1997. When Hollywood Sucks, or, Hungry Girls, Lost Boys, and Vampirism in the Age of Reagan. In Blood Read: The Vampire as Metaphor in Contemporary Culture, ed. Joan Gordon and Veronica Hollinger, 115–128. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pressman, Jessica. 2006. House of Leaves: Reading the Networked Novel. Studies in American Fiction 34 (1): 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scholder, Amy, and Ira Silverberg, eds. 1991. High Risk: An Anthology of Forbidden Writings. London: Serpent’s Tail.Google Scholar
  23. Seltzer, Mark. 1998. Serial Killers: Death and Life in America’s Wound Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Shklovsky, Victor. 1965. Art as Technique. In Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, ed. and trans. Lee T. Lemon and Marion J. Reis, 3–24. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  25. Silverblatt, Michael. 1993. Shock Appeal: Who Are These Writers, and Why Do They Want to Hurt Us?: The New Fiction of Transgression. LA Times, 1 August. http://articles.latimes.com/1993-08-01/books/bk-21466_1_young-writers. Accessed November 22, 2012.
  26. Simpson, Philip L. 2000. Psycho Paths: Tracking the Serial Killer through Contemporary American Film and Television. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Stallybrass, Peter, and Allon White. 1986. The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Tauchert, Ashley. 2008. Against Transgression. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Wall Street. 1987. Directed by Oliver Stone. 20th Century Fox.Google Scholar
  30. Williamson, Milly. 2005. The Lure of the Vampire: Gender, Fiction and Fandom from Bram Stoker to Buffy. London: Wallflower.Google Scholar
  31. Young, Elizabeth, and Graham Caveney, eds. 1992. Shopping in Space: Essays on American “Blank Generation” Fiction. London: Serpent’s Tail.Google Scholar
  32. Zinn, Maxine Baca, and D. Stanley Eitzen. 1987. Diversity in American Families. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Coco d’Hont
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent ScholarNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations