Evolutionary Study of Horror Literature

  • Mathias Clasen


Evolutionary horror study is an emerging research field that uses as its theoretical foundation the sciences of human nature. Evolutionary horror scholars claim that we can understand horror fiction as a cultural technology that works by tapping into ancient, defensive psychological mechanisms to satisfy an adaptive appetite for vicarious experience with threat scenarios. The genre elicits negative emotions ranging from disgust to terror, usually via the representation of fictional monsters that engage the evolved fear system by mimicking cues of threat. Immersion in a fictional world of horror is rewarding because it serves the adaptive functions of emotional, moral, and cognitive calibration. Although evolutionary horror study is growing in visibility and productivity, it is an emerging enterprise in need of much theoretical and interpretative work.


  1. Aldana Reyes, Xavier. 2016. Introduction: What, Why, and When Is Horror Fiction? In Horror: A Literary History, ed. Xavier Aldana Reyes, 7–17. London: The British Library.Google Scholar
  2. Asma, Stephen T. 2015. Monsters on the Brain: An Evolutionary Epistemology of Horror. Social Research: An International Quarterly 81 (4): 941–968.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, H. Clark. 2005. Adaptations to Predators and Prey. In The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, ed. David M. Buss, 200–223. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Boyd, Brian. 2009. On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boyer, Pascal. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, Noël. 1990. The Philosophy of Horror, or, Paradoxes of the Heart. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, Joseph. 2004. Literary Darwinism: Evolution, Human Nature, and Literature. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2006. The Human Revolution and the Adaptive Function of Literature. Philosophy and Literature 30 (1): 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2013. A Rationale for Evolutionary Studies of Literature. Scientific Study of Literature 3 (1): 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2018. Evolutionary Literary Theory. In Blackwell Companion to Literary Theory, ed. David Richter. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Carroll, Joseph, Jonathan Gottschall, John A. Johnson, and Daniel J. Kruger. 2012. Graphing Jane Austen: The Evolutionary Basis of Literary Meaning, Cognitive Studies in Literature and Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. elektronisk materiale.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clasen, Mathias. 2010. The Horror! The Horror! The Evolutionary Review 1 (1): 112–119.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2012a. Attention, Predation, Counterintuition: Why Dracula Won’t Die. Style 46 (3): 378–398.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2012b. Monsters Evolve: A Biocultural Approach to Horror Stories. Review of General Psychology 16 (2): 222–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ———. 2014. Evil Monsters in Horror Fiction: An Evolutionary Perspective on Form and Function. In A History of Evil in Popular Culture: What Hannibal Lecter, Stephen King, and Vampires Reveal About America, ed. Sharon Packer and Jody Pennington, 39–47. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2016. Terrifying Monsters, Malevolent Ghosts, and Evolved Danger-Management Architecture: A Consilient Approach to Horror Fiction. In Darwin’s Bridge: Uniting the Humanities and Sciences, ed. Joseph Carroll, Dan P. McAdams, and E.O. Wilson, 183–193. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2017a. Hauntings of Human Nature: An Evolutionary Critique of King’s The Shining. Style 51 (1): 76–88.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2017b. Why Horror Seduces, 2017. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 2018. The Evolution of Horror: A Neo-Lovecraftian Poetics. In New Directions in Supernatural Horror Literature: The Critical Influence of H.P. Lovecraft, ed. Sean Moreland. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Coss, Richard G., and R.O. Goldthwaite. 1995. The Persistence of Old Designs for Perception. In Perspectives in Ethology 11: Behavioral Design, ed. N.S. Thompson, 83–148. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  21. Freeland, Cynthia A. 2004. Horror and Art-Dread. In The Horror Film, ed. Stephen Prince, 189–205. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gottschall, Jonathan. 2008. The Rape of Troy: Evolution, Violence, and the World of Homer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2012. The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  24. Grodal, Torben Kragh. 2009. Embodied Visions: Evolution, Emotion, Culture, and Film. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Random House Inc.Google Scholar
  26. Hogle, Jerrold E., and Andrew Smith. 2009. Revisiting the Gothic and Theory: An Introduction. Gothic Studies 11 (1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. King, Stephen. 2010. Afterword. In Full Dark, No Stars, 365–368. New York: Gallery Books.Google Scholar
  28. King, Robert. 2015. A Regiment of Monstrous Women: Female Horror Archetypes and Life History Theory. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences 9 (3): 170–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, Jens. 2016. Evil Origins: A Darwinian Genealogy of the Popcultural Villain. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences 10 (2): 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lovecraft, H.P. 2000. The Annotated Supernatural Horror in Literature. New York: Hippocampus Press.Google Scholar
  31. Marks, Isaac M., and Randolph M. Nesse. 1994. Fear and Fitness: An Evolutionary Analysis of Anxiety Disorders. Ethology and Sociobiology 15 (5–6): 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Öhman, Arne, and Susan Mineka. 2001. Fears, Phobias, and Preparedness: Toward an Evolved Module of Fear and Fear Learning. Psychological Review 108 (3): 483–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinker, Steven. 2002. The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  34. Saler, Benson, and Charles A. Ziegler. 2005. Dracula and Carmilla: Monsters and the Mind. Philosophy and Literature 29 (1): 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shelley, Mary. 1994. Frankenstein. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Steen, Francis F., and Stephanie A. Owens. 2001. Evolution’s Pedagogy: An Adaptationist Model of Pretense and Entertainment. Journal of Cognition and Culture 1 (4): 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Swanger, David. 2008. Shock and Awe: The Emotional Roots of Compound Genres. New York Review of Science Fiction 20 (5): 1, 8–1,18.Google Scholar
  38. Vanderbeke, Dirk, and Brett Cooke, eds. In press. Don’t We All Like It?: Popular Literature and Culture under an Evolutionary Lens. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  39. Winter, Douglas E. 1988. Introduction. In Prime Evil: New Stories by the Masters of Modern Horror, ed. Douglas E. Winter, 11–21. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mathias Clasen
    • 1
  1. 1.Aarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations