Advertisement

Postmodern Literary Labyrinths: Spaces of Horror Reimagined

  • Katharine Cox
Chapter

Abstract

Cox examines horror in Angela Carter’s The Passion of New Eve (1977) and Mark Z. Danielewski’s House of Leaves (2000) as the confrontation with labyrinthine architecture that represents bodily and psychological reflections of self as monstrous, disorientating, and feminine. The reimagined space (re)absorbs and so threatens the protagonists with existential nothingness. Drawing on the abject body, there is an inevitable confrontation with an active maternal origin. Horror is elicited, not by the expected confrontation with the monster, but by encounter with the anthropomorphic labyrinth’s ability to entrap, nullify, and transform. Surprisingly, the experience of these labyrinths, as a reimagined space of horror, typically results in positive transformation. The labyrinth is both the locus of horror and a means to understand and move on from trauma.

Bibliography

  1. Ayrton, Michael. 1974. The Seventh Jackson Knight Memorial Lecture: A Meaning to Maze. Abingdon: Abbey Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, Roland. 2010. The Preparation of the Novel: Lecture Courses and Seminars at the Collège de France (1978–1979 and 1979–1980). Trans. Kate Briggs. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Botting, Fred. 2013. The Gothic. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2015. Horrorspace: Reading House of Leaves. Horror Studies 6 (2): 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter, Angela. 1977. The Passion of New Eve. London: Virago.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 1983. Notes from the Front Line. In On Gender and Writing, ed. Michelene Wandor, 69–77. London: Pandora Press.Google Scholar
  7. Catto, Bonnie. 1988. The Labyrinth on the Cumaean Gates and Aeneas’ Escape from Troy. Vergilius 34: 71–76.Google Scholar
  8. Cavallaro, Dani. 2011. The World of Angela Carter: A Critical Investigation. Jefferson: McFarland.Google Scholar
  9. Cottrell, Sophie. 2000. A Conversation with Mark Z. Danielewski. Bold Type 3 (12).Google Scholar
  10. Cox, Katharine. 2006. ‘What has made me?’ Locating Mother in the Textual Labyrinth of Mark Z. Danielewski’s House of Leaves. Critical Survey 18 (2): 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danielewski, Mark Z. 2000. House of Leaves. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Dawson, Conor. 2015. There’s Nothing So Black as the Inferno of the Human Mind: Infernal Phenomenal Reference and Trauma in Mark Z. Danielewski’s House of Leaves. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 56 (3): 284–298.Google Scholar
  13. Duncker, Patricia. 1984. Re-Imagining the Fairy Tales: Angela Carter’s Bloody Chambers. Literature and History 10: 3–11.Google Scholar
  14. Faris, Wendy B. 1988. Labyrinths of Language: Symbolic Landscape and Narrative Design in Modern Fiction. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Filarete, Antonio Averlino detto il. 1972. Trattato di architettura. Ed. Anna Maria Finoli and Liliana Grassi. Milan: Edizione il Polifilo.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, Michel. 2004. Death and the Labyrinth: The World of Raymond Roussel. Trans. C. Ruas. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Gamble, Sarah. 1997. Angela Carter: Writing from the Front Line. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gere, Cathy. 2010. Knossos and the Prophets of Modernism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gibbons, Alison. 2011. This is not for You. In Mark Z. Danielewski, ed. Joe Bray and Alison Gibbons, 17–32. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2012a. Multimodal Literature and Experimentation. In Routledge Companion to Experimental Literature, ed. Joe Bray, Alison Gibbons, and Brian McHale, 420–434. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2012b. Multimodality, Cognition, and Experimental Literature. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibbs, Alan. 2014. Contemporary American Trauma Narratives. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gruss, Susanne. 2009. The Pleasure of the Feminist Text: Reading Michele Roberts and Angela Carter. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  24. Hayles, N. Katherine. 2002a. Saving the Subject: Remediation in House of Leaves. American Literature 71 (4): 779–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. 2002b. Writing Machines. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hillis Miller, J. 1992. Ariadne’s Thread: Story Lines. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Karpinsky, Eva C. 2000. Signifying Passion: Angela Carter’s Heroes and Villains as a Dystopian Romance. Utopian Studies 11 (2): 137–151.Google Scholar
  28. Kern, Hermann. 2000. Through the Labyrinth: Designs and Meanings Over 5000 Years. New York: Prestel.Google Scholar
  29. Kristeva, Julia. 1982. The Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Trans. L.S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Matthews, W.H. 1922. Mazes and Labyrinths: A General Account of their History and Development. London: Dover.Google Scholar
  31. McCabe, Eamonn. 2014. From the Archive, 30 July 1994: Photojournalist Kevin Carter Dies. The Guardian, 30 July. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jul/30/kevin-carter-photojournalist-obituary-archive-1994.
  32. Pope, Alexander. 1994. Essay on Man. In Essay on Man and Other Poems, 45–78. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  33. Shields, Carol. 1997. Larry’s Party. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  34. Slocombe, Will. 2005. ‘This is not for You’: Nihilism and the House that Jacques Built. Modern Fiction Studies 51 (1): 88–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Toth, Josh. 2013. Healing Postmodern America: Plasticity and Renewal in Danielewski’s House of Leaves. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 54 (2): 181–197.Google Scholar
  36. Vint, Sherryl. 2015. Ab-realism: Fractal Language and Social Change. In China Miéville: Critical Essays (Contemporary Writers: Critical Essays No. 3), ed. Caroline Edwards and Tony Venezia, 39–59. Canterbury: Gylphi.Google Scholar
  37. Welby, Lizzy. 2014. Abjected Landscapes: Crossing Psychogenic Borders in Angela Carter’s The Passion of New Eve. Studies in the Literary Imagination 47 (1): 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilson, Elizabeth. 1992. The Sphinx in the City: Urban Life, the Control of Disorder, and Women. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ziolkowski, Theodore. 2008. Minos and the Moderns: Cretan Myth in Twentieth-Century Literature and Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katharine Cox
    • 1
  1. 1.Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations