Using Discursive Psychology to Explore Contested and Troubled Pasts

  • Cristian Tileagă
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology book series (PSDP)


This chapter first introduces basic features of discursive social psychology. It then goes on to discuss the contribution of discursive psychology (DP) to researching contested and troubled pasts. Finally, the chapter discusses some of the key tenets of an emerging interdisciplinary dialogue between DP and history.


  1. Adelsward, V. (1998). Moral Dilemmas and Moral Rhetoric in Interviews with Conscientious Objectors. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(3–4), 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antaki, C. (2013). Two Conversational Practices for Encouraging Adults with Intellectual Disabilities to Reflect on Their Activities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57, 580–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Augoustinos, M., Hastie, B., & Wright, M. (2011). Apologizing for Historical Injustice: Emotion, Truth and Identity in Political Discourse. Discourse & Society, 22, 507–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, C. (1997). Ticketing Rules: Categorization and Moral Ordering in a School Staff Meeting. In S. Hester & E. Peter (Eds.), Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis (pp. 77–98). Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, C. (2000). Locating Culture in Action: Membership Categorisation in Texts and Talk. In A. Lee & C. Poynton (Eds.), Culture and Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies (pp. 99–113). St. Leonards: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. Barthélémy, M. (2003). Temporal Perspectives in the Practical-Textual Handling of a European Public Problem. Social Science Information, 42, 403–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benwell, B., & Stokoe, E. (2006). Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bergmann, J. R. (1992). Veiled Morality: Notes on Discretion in Psychiatry. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 137–162). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bergmann, J. R. (1998). Introduction: Morality in Discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(3-4), 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Billig, M. (1997). Discursive, Rhetorical and Ideological Messages. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The Message of Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Billig, M. (1999). Freudian Repression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Braithwaite, J. (1999). Restorative Justice: Assessing Optimistic and Pessimistic Accounts. Crime and Justice, 25, 1–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Braithwaite, J. (2000). Repentance Rituals and Restorative Justice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 8, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Button, G. (1991). Ethnomethodology and the Foundational Respecification of the Human Sciences. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp. 1–9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chua, B. (1979). Democracy as Textual Accomplishment. The Sociological Quarterly, 20, 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coulter, J. (2001). Human Practices and the Observability of the “Macro-Social”. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 29–41). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Discourse Studies. (2006). Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition, (special issue), 8(1).Google Scholar
  20. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Edwards, D. (2003). Analyzing Racial Discourse: The Discursive Psychology of Mind-World Relationships. In H. van den Berg, M. Wetherell, & H. Houtkoop-Steenstra (Eds.), Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview (pp. 31–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Edwards, D. (2005). Moaning, Whinging and Laughing: The Subjective Side of Complaints. Discourse Studies, 7, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Edwards, D. (2006). Facts, Norms and Dispositions: Practical Uses of the Modal Verb Would in Police Interrogations. Discourse Studies, 8(4), 475–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Edwards, D. (2012). Discursive and Scientific Psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 425–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2001). Discursive Psychology. In A. McHoul & M. Rapley (Eds.), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings (pp. 12–24). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  28. Eglin, P., & Hester, S. (2003). The Montreal Massacre: A Story of Membership Categorisation Analysis. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Frosh, S. (2010). Psychoanalysis Outside the Clinic: Interventions in Psychosocial Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gergen, K. (2005). Narrative, Moral Identity and Historical Consciousness: A Social Constructionist Account. In J. Straub (Ed.), Narration, Identity and Historical Consciousness (pp. 99–119). New York: Bergham Books.Google Scholar
  31. Gergen, M., & Gergen, K. (2002). Ethnographic Representation as Relationship. In A. Bochner & C. Ellis (Eds.), Ethnographically Speaking (pp. 11–33). Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hanson-Easey, S., & Augoustinos, M. (2011). Complaining about Humanitarian Refugees: The Role of Sympathy Talk in the Design of Complaints on Talkback Radio. Discourse & Communication, 5, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harré, R. (1999). Trust and Its Surrogates: Psychological Foundations of Political Process. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and Trust (pp. 249–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harré, R., & Tissaw, M. (2005). Wittgenstein and Psychology: A Practical Guide. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2012). Crying and Crying Responses. In A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Emotion in Interaction (pp. 194–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hepburn, A., & Wiggins, S. (Eds.). (2007). Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Heritage, J., & Lindstrom, A. (1998). Motherhood, Medicine and Morality: Scenes from a Medical Encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(3–4), 397–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Housley, W. (2002). Moral Discrepancy and “Fudging the Issue” in a Radio News Interview. Sociology, 36(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jayyusi, L. (1991a). Values and Moral Judgement: Communicative Praxis as Moral Order. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp. 227–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jayyusi, L. (1991b). The Equivocal Text and the Objective World. Continuum, 5, 166–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jordanova, L. (2006). History in Practice (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  43. LaCapra, D. (2001). Writing History, Writing Trauma. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Linell, P., & Marková, I. (Eds.). (2013). Dialogical Approaches to Trust in Communication. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  45. Lynch, M. (1999). Archives in Formation: Privileged Spaces, Popular Archives and Paper Trails. History of the Human Sciences, 12, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lynch, M., & Bogen, D. (1996). The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Middleton, D., & Brown, S. D. (2005). The Social Psychology of Experience: Studies in Remembering and Forgetting. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Middleton, D., & Edwards, D. (1990). Collective Remembering. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Potter, J. (1996). Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Potter, J. (2003). Discursive Psychology: Between Method and Paradigm. Discourse & Society, 14, 783–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Potter, J. (2012). Re-reading Discourse and Social Psychology: Transforming Social Psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Prior, L. (2004). Documents. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice (pp. 375–390). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Rapley, M., McCarthy, D., & McHoul, A. (2003). Mentality or Morality? Membership Categorization, Multiple Meanings and Mass Murder. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schütz, A. (1964). Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, D. (1974). The Social Construction of Documentary Reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith, D. (1987). The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, D. (1990a). The Active Text: A Textual Analysis of the Social Relations of Public Textual Discourse. In Texts. Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling (pp. 120–158). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Smith, D. (1990b). Textually Mediated Social Organization. In Texts, Facts and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling (pp. 209–224). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Sneijder, P., & te Molder, H. (2005). Moral Logic and Logical Morality: Attributions of Responsibility and Blame in Online Discourse on Veganism. Discourse & Society, 16, 675–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Speer, S., & McPhillips, R. (2013). Patients’ Perspectives on Psychiatric Consultations in the Gender Identity Clinic: Implications for Patient-Centered Communication. Patient Education and Counseling, 91, 385–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stan, L. (2006). The Vanishing Truth: Politics and Memory in Post-communist Europe. East European Quarterly, 40, 383–408.Google Scholar
  63. Stevens, G., Duncan, N., & Hook, D. (Eds.). (2013). Race, Memory and the Apartheid Archive: Towards a Transformative Psychosocial Praxis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  64. Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving Forward with Membership Categorization Analysis: Methods for Systematic Analysis. Discourse Studies, 14, 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2007). “Black this, Black That”: Racial Insults and Reported Speech in Neighbour Complaints and Police Interrogations. Discourse & Society, 18, 337–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2012). Mundane Morality and Gender in Familial Neighbour Disputes. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 9(2), 165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stokoe, E., Hepburn, A., & Antaki, C. (2012). Beware the “Loughborough School” of Social Psychology: Interaction and the Politics of Intervention. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 486–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tileagă, C. (2005). Accounting for Extreme Prejudice and Legitimating Blame in Talk about the Romanies. Discourse & Society, 16, 603–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tileagă, C. (2008). What Is a Revolution: National Commemoration, Collective Memory and Managing Authenticity in the Representation of a Political Event. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tileagă, C. (2010). Cautious Morality: Public Accountability, Moral Order and Accounting for a Conflict of Interest. Discourse Studies, 12(2), 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tileagă, C. (2011). (Re)writing Biography: Memory, Identity, and Textually Mediated Reality in Coming to Terms with the Past. Culture & Psychology, 17, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tileagă, C., & Stokoe, E. (Eds.). (2015). Discursive Psychology: Classic and Contemporary Issues. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Todorov, T. (2009). In Defence of the Enlightenment. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  74. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Watson, R. (1997). Ethnomethodology and Textual Analysis. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 80–98). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  76. Watson, R. (2009). Constitutive Practices and Garfinkel’s Notion of Trust: Revisited. Journal of Classical Sociology, 9, 475–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wertsch, J. (2007). Collective Memory. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 645–660). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-structuralism in Dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wetherell, M. (2001). Debates in Discourse Research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: Sage and Open University.Google Scholar
  80. Wetherell, M. (2007). A Step Too Far: Discursive Psychology, Linguistic Ethnography and Questions of Identity. Journal of SocioLinguistics, 11, 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wiggins, S. (2017). Discursive Psychology: Theory, Method and Applications. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  82. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristian Tileagă
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social SciencesLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations