Advertisement

Communism as Moral Problem

  • Cristian Tileagă
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Discursive Psychology book series (PSDP)

Abstract

Romania has undergone a radical, yet troubled transition to democracy in the last 20 years. Successive post-1989 governments have drawn on a notion of collective memory that reflected both progressive arguments for change and facing the past and conservative arguments of putting the past to rest.

References

  1. Assmann, J. (1995). Collective Memory and Cultural Identity. New German Critique, 65(Spring–Summer), 125–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, C. (2000). Locating Culture in Action: Membership Categorisation in Texts and Talk. In A. Lee & C. Poynton (Eds.), Culture and Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies (pp. 99–113). St. Leonards: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  3. Barthélémy, M. (2003). Temporal Perspectives in the Practical-Textual Handling of a European Public Problem. Social Science Information, 42, 403–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berard, T. (2005). On multiple Identities and Educational Contexts: Remarks on the Study of Inequalities and Discrimination. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 4, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billig, M. (1998). Talking of the Royal family. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bruner, J. (2005). Past and Present as Narrative Constructions. In J. Straub (Ed.), Narration, Identity and Historical Consciousness (pp. 23–43). New York: Bergham Books.Google Scholar
  7. Cameron, L. (2007). Patterns of Metaphor Use in Reconciliation Talk. Discourse & Society, 18(2), 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cesereanu, R. (2008). The Final Report on the Holocaust and the Final Report on the Communist Dictatorship in Romania. East European Politics and Societies, 22, 270–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chua, B. (1979a). Democracy as Textual Accomplishment. The Sociological Quarterly, 20, 541–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chua, B. (1979b). Describing a National Crisis: An Exploration in Textual Analysis. Human Studies, 2, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciobanu, M. (2009). Criminalising the Past and Reconstructing Collective Memory: The Romanian Truth Commission. Europe-Asia Studies, 61, 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, S. (2001). States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and Suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, S. (2006). History Out of Joint: Essays on the Use and Abuse of History. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Condor, S. (2006). Temporality and Collectivity: Diversity, History and the Rhetorical Construction of National Entitativity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 657–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connolly, W. (1993). The Terms of Political Discourse (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Coulter, J. (2001). Human Practices and the Observability of the “Macro-Social”. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 29–41). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. de Certeau, M. (1986). Heterologies: Discourse on the Other. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dragusin, N. (2007). Raportul Tismaneanu. Sfera Politicii, 126–127, 3–6.Google Scholar
  19. Drew, P. (2006). When Documents ‘Speak’: Documents, Language and Interaction. In P. Drew, G. Raymond, & D. Weinberg (Eds.), Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods (pp. 63–80). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunmire, P. (2005). Preempting the Future: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Future in Political Discourse. Discourse & Society, 16, 481–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edelman, M. (2001). The Politics of Misinformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Eglin, P., & Hester, S. (2003). The Montreal Massacre: A Story of Membership Categorisation Analysis. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Frow, J. (2001). A Politics of Stolen Time. In J. May & N. Thrift (Eds.), Timespace: Geographies of Temporality (pp. 73–88). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Gergen, K. (2005). Narrative, Moral Identity and Historical Consciousness: A Social Constructionist Account. In J. Straub (Ed.), Narration, Identity and Historical Consciousness (pp. 99–119). New York: Bergham Books.Google Scholar
  26. Green, B. (1983). Knowing the Poor: A Case-Study in Textual Reality Construction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  27. Habermas, J. (1988). Concerning the Public Use of History. New German Critique, 44, 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Habermas, J., & Michnik, A. (1994). Overcoming the Past. New Left Review, I/203, 3–16.Google Scholar
  29. Halbwachs, M. (1952/1992). On Collective Memory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (1997). The Reflexive Constitution of Category, Predicate and Context in Two Settings. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (Eds.), Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorisation Analysis (pp. 25–48). Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  31. Hilton, D. J., Erb, H. P., Dermot, M., & Molian, D. J. (1996). Social Representations of History and Attitudes to European Unification in Britain, France and Germany. In G. M. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds.), Changing European Identities: Advances in Social Psychology (pp. 275–296). Oxford: Buttherworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  32. Hodge, B., & McHoul, A. (1992). The Politics of Text and Commentary. Textual Practice, 6, 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hogea, A. (2010). Coming to Terms with the Communist Past in Romania: An Analysis of the Political and Media Discourse Concerning the Tismăneanu Report. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 2(1), 16–30.Google Scholar
  34. Huyssen, A. (2003). Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Ibañez, T. (1994). Constructing a Representation or Representing a Construction? Theory & Psychology, 4, 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jayyusi, L. (1991a). Values and Moral Judgement: Communicative Praxis as Moral Order. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp. 227–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jayyusi, L. (1991b). The Equivocal Text and the Objective World. Continuum, 5, 166–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu, J. H., & Hilton, D. J. (2005). How the Past Weighs on the Present: Social Representations of History and Their Role in Identity Politics. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 537–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luczynski, J. (1997). The Multivoicedness of Historical Representations in a Changing Sociocultural Context: Young Polish Adults’ Representations of World War II. Culture & Psychology, 3(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lynch, M., & Bogen, D. (1996). The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Middleton, D., & Brown, S. D. (2005). The Social Psychology of Experience: Studies in Remembering and Forgetting. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Middleton, D., & Brown, S. D. (2007). Issues in the Socio-Cultural Study of Memory: Making Memory Matter. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 661–677). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murakami, K. (2007). Positioning in Accounting for Redemption and Reconciliation. Culture & Psychology, 13, 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pennebaker, J., & Banasik, B. (1997). On the Creation and Maintenance of Collective Memories: History as Social Psychology. In J. Pennebaker, D. Paez, & B. Rime (Eds.), Collective Memory of Political Events: Social Psychological Perspectives (pp. 3–20). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  45. Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of Life 2: An Invitation to Critical Humanism. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimating Claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Poole, R. (2008). Memory, History and the Claims of the Past. Memory Studies, 1, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prior, L. (1997). Following on Foucault’s Footsteps: Text and Context in Qualitative Research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 63–79). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Santiso, J. (1998). The Fall into the Present: The Emergence of Limited Political Temporalities in Latin America. Time & Society, 7, 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sibley, C., Liu, J., Duckitt, J., & Khan, S. (2008). Social Representations of History and the Legitimation of Social Inequality: The Form and Function of Historical Negation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 542–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, D. (1974). The Social Construction of Documentary Reality. Sociological Inquiry, 44, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stan, L. (2007). Comisia Tismăneanu: repere internaţionale. Sfera Politicii, 126–127, 7–13.Google Scholar
  53. Stan, L. (Ed.). (2009). Transitional Justice in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Straub, J. (2005). Telling Stories, Making History: Toward a Narrative Psychology of the Historical Construction of Meaning. In J. Straub (Ed.), Narration, Identity and Historical Consciousness (pp. 44–98). New York: Bergham Books.Google Scholar
  55. Taylor, S., & Wetherell, M. (1999). A Suitable Time and Place: Speakers’ Use of ‘Time’ to do Discursive Work in Narratives of National and Personal Life. Time & Society, 8, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Teitel, R. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Tileagă, C., & Byford, J. (Eds.). (2014). Psychology and History: Interdisciplinary Explorations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Tismăneanu, V. (1998). Fantasies of Salvation: Democracy, Nationalism, and Myth in Postcommunist Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Tismăneanu, V. (2007a). Confronting Romania’s Past: A Response to Charles King. Slavic Review, 66(Winter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tismăneanu, V. (2007b). Refuzul de A Uita: Articole şi Comentarii Politice (2006–2007). Iasi: Curtea Veche.Google Scholar
  61. Tismăneanu, V. (2008). Democracy and Memory: Romania Confronts Its Communist Past. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 617(1), 166–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Valsiner, J., & Rosa, A. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. van Leeuwen, T. (1995). Representing Social Action. Discourse & Society, 6, 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Time in Discourse. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 1, 127–145.Google Scholar
  65. Watson, R. (1997). Ethnomethodology and Textual Analysis. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice (pp. 80–98). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Watson, R. (2009). Constitutive Practices and Garfinkel’s Notion of Trust: Revisited. Journal of Classical Sociology, 9, 475–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wertsch, J. (1997). Narrative Tools of History and Identity. Culture & Psychology, 3, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wertsch, J. (2007). Collective Memory. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 645–660). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristian Tileagă
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social SciencesLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations