Advertisement

Possible Future European Union Party-Political Systems

  • Martin Westlake
Chapter
Part of the European Administrative Governance book series (EAGOV)

Abstract

This chapter assumes that post-war steps to a parliamentary party-political European Union (EU) are irreversible. It further assumes, more debatably, that the Spitzenkandidaten procedure is also irreversible. It acknowledges six ‘known unknowns’ that could have consequences for the evolution of the Union’s party-political system. It considers several basic questions about the model the Union has cumulatively chosen before examining some of the ‘discontents’ of party-political systems and their potential relevance to the EU’s emerging system. It briefly considers whether the early evolution of the US party-political system might shed light on possible developments. It concludes that the existence of a parliamentary party-political system, with electoral linkage between the executive and the legislature, is a necessary but far from sufficient condition for viable governance—and opposition.

References

  1. Bundesverfassungsgericht. (2009) Federal Constitutional Court Judgment, BVerfG, 2 BvE 2/08. 13 Article 9 TEU. 6, 30 June.Google Scholar
  2. Castles, F., & Wildenmann, R. (Eds.). (1986). Visions and Realities of Party Government. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  3. Chang, M., & Dermot, H. (2017). The EP and the Oversight of EMU Before and After the Euro Crisis. Paper delivered at the 29–30 May 2017 Joint College of Europe and European Parliamentary Research Service conference on ‘The European Parliament in Times of Crisis: Dynamics and Transformations.’Google Scholar
  4. De La Baume, M. (2017, May 15). MEPs Debate Who Inherits British Seats. Politico.Google Scholar
  5. Duff, A. (2015a). Pandora, Penelope, Polity; How to Change the European Union. London: John Harper Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Duff, A. (2015b). Democratic Legitimacy in the European Union: Taking a New Look at the Composition and Electoral Procedure of the European Parliament. In The Electoral Reform of the European Parliament: Composition, Procedure and Legitimacy, In-Depth Analysis for the AFCO Committee, European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies, PE 510.002.Google Scholar
  7. Duff, A. (2015c). The Protocol of Frankfurt: A New Treaty for the Eurozone. Brussels: European Policy Centre.Google Scholar
  8. Duverger, M. (1954). Political Parties. Their Organisation and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. (2017a, March 1). White Paper on the Future of Europe: Reflections and Scenarios for the EU 27 by 2025, Brussels.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2017b, May 31). Reflection Paper on the Deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union, Brussels.Google Scholar
  11. European Council. (2016, February 23). A New Settlement for the United Kingdom Within the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, 59(C69I), 1–16.Google Scholar
  12. Fabbrini, S. (2007). Compound Democracies: Why the United States and Europe Are Becoming Similar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Galli, G. (1967). Il Bipartitismo Imperfetto: Comunisti e democristiani in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  14. Hanning, J. (1984). Twenty Years of Polarized Pluralism. European Journal of Political Research, 12, 433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hennette, S., Piketty, T., Sacriste, G., & Vauchez, A. (2017, May 14). For a Treaty Democratizing Euro Area Governance – (T-Dem). Social Europe (blog). Retrieved from https://www.socialeurope.eu/2017/04/treaty-democratizing-euro-area-governance-t-dem/.
  16. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hübner, D. M., & Pereira, P. S. (2018). European Parliament Resolution of 7 February 2018 on the Composition of the European Parliament (2017/2054(INL) – 2017/0900(NLE)). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P8-TA-2018-0029&language=EN&ring=A8-2018-0007.
  18. Jacobs, F. (1989). Western European Political Parties: A Comprehensive Guide. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, A. (2017, March 28). Why Brexit Is Best for Britain: The Left-Wing Case. New York Times.Google Scholar
  20. Juncker, J.-C. (2017, September 13). The State of the Union: Catching the Wind in Our Sails. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-3164_en.htm.
  21. Juncker, J.-C., Donald, T., Jeroen, D., Mario, D., & Martin, S. (2015, October 21). Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union, Brussels.Google Scholar
  22. Kalcik, Robert, & Wolff, Guntram B. (2017). Is Brexit an Opportunity to Reform the European Parliament? Policy Contribution, Issue No. 2, Breugel.Google Scholar
  23. Kenealy, D., Peterson, J., & Corbett, R. (Eds.). (2015). The European Union: How Does It Work? Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967a). Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967b). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Macron, E. (2017). Le Programme de Emmanuel Macron, Le Monde. Retrieved from http://www.lemonde.fr/personnalite/emmanuel-macron/programme/.
  27. Magnette, P. (2017). Ten Thoughts On the Treaty Democratizing the Euro Area (T-DEM). Social Europe. Retrieved from https://www.socialeurope.eu/2017/06/ten-thoughts-treaty-democratizing-euro-area-t-dem/.
  28. Mair, P. (1983). Adaptation and Control: Towards an Understanding of Party and Party System Change. In H. Daalder & P. Mair (Eds.), Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Mair, P. (2007). Political Opposition and the European Union. Government and Opposition, 42(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Marchetti, R. (2016). Global Strategic Engagement. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  32. Marquand, D. (1979). Parliament for Europe. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  33. Münchau, W. (2017, May 8). Emmanuel Macron Sets His Sights on Economic and Eurozone Reforms. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  34. Nothomb, C.-F. (2017, May 15). La particratie actuelle tue la démocratie. La Libre Belgique.Google Scholar
  35. Piketty, T. (2017, March 22). What Would a Democratic Euro Zone Assembly Look Like? Le blog de Thomas Piketty. Le Monde. http://piketty.blog.lemonde.fr/2017/03/22/what-would-a-euro-zone-assembly-look-like/.
  36. Reif, K. (Ed.) (1984). European Elections 1979/81 and 1984. European Electoral Studies. Berlin: Quorum.Google Scholar
  37. Reif, K. (Ed.). (1985). Ten European Elections. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  38. Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Essex: European Consortium of Political Research.Google Scholar
  39. Sartori, G. (1983). Teoria dei partiti e caso Italiano. Milan: Sugar Co Edizione.Google Scholar
  40. Suttner, R. (2006). Party Dominance ‘Theory’: Of What Value? Politikon South African Journal of Political Studies, 33(3), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Parijs, P. (2015). Justifying Europe. In P. Van Parijs & L. van Middelaar (Eds.), After the Storm. How to Save Democracy in Europe (pp. 247–261). Tielt: Lannoo.Google Scholar
  42. Van Parijs, P. (2016). Thatcher’s Plot – And How to Defeat It. Social Europe: Politics, Economy & Labour (blog). Retrieved from https://www.socialeurope.eu/2016/11/thatchers-plot-defeat.
  43. Van Parijs, P. (2017). Demos-cracy for the European Union: Why and How. In L. Cabrera (Ed.), Institutional Cosmopolitanism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Welle, K. (2014, September 9). Why This Time Is Different?’ – Presentation at Martens Centre for European Studies. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/the-secretary-general/en/activities-multimedia/why-this-time-is-different-presentation-at-martens-ces.
  45. Welle, K. (2016, May 5). Are the EU and the US Becoming Similar?’ Talk delivered at the LUISS University, Rome. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/the-secretary-general/en/activities-multimedia/%E2%80%98are-the-eu-and-the-us-becoming-similar-%E2%80%99-%E2%80%93-klaus-welle-at-the-luiss-university.
  46. Westlake, M. (2016, January). Chronicle of an Election Foretold: The Longer-Term Trends Leading to the ‘Spitzenkandidaten’ Procedure and the Election of Jean-Claude Juncker as European Commission President. LSE Europe in Question Discussion Paper Series, No. 102.Google Scholar
  47. Westlake, M. (2017a). The Inevitability of Gradualness: the Longer-term Origins of the 23 June 2016 ‘Brexit’ Referendum. Bruges Political Research Papers, College of Europe, Bruges, No. 56.Google Scholar
  48. Westlake, M. (2017b). Globalisation, Civil Society and New World Orders. European Political Science, 16, 1–5.Google Scholar
  49. Wildenmann, R. (1986). The Problematic of Party Government. In F. Castles & R. Wildenmann (Eds.), Visions and Realities of Party Government. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  50. Van Middelaar, L. (2017, March 25). Three Things the EU Must Do to Survive. The Guardian.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Westlake
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.College of EuropeBrugesBelgium
  2. 2.European Institute, London School of EconomicsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations