Advertisement

Migration Policies Debates in the European Parliament: Does the Mainstream Right Stand Its Ground?

  • Brice Cristoforetti
  • Lara Querton
Chapter
Part of the European Administrative Governance book series (EAGOV)

Abstract

Focusing on migration policies debated in the European Parliament (EP), this chapter studies the plenary speeches of four right-wing political groups between 2009 and 2017. The objective is to observe the narratives of mainstream right Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) (European People’s Party [EPP]) and their evolution over time, as well as to compare them to the speeches of three peripheral right groups’ representatives (ECR, EFD(D), ENF). As the latter gained significant political weight following the 2014 European elections, we expected the EPP speeches to be progressively suffused with some peripheral right discursive content, reflecting a more restrictive and nationalist position. However, we found a high level of EPP discursive independence towards these peripheral right groups as its narrative patterns have mostly remained similar over time and have kept a distinct content.

References

  1. Abou-Chadi, T. (2016). Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts: How Green and Far-Right Parties Differ in Their Impact. British Journal of Political Science, 46(02), 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bale, T. (2008). Turning Round the Telescope. Centre-Right Parties and Immigration and Integration Policy in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(3), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bale, T., Green-Pedersen, C., Krouwel, A. A., Luther, K. R., & Sitter, N. (2009). If You Can’t Beat Them, Join Them? Explaining Social Democratic Responses to the Challenge from the Populist Radical Right in Western Europe. Political Studies, 58(3), 410–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bale, T., & Partos, R. (2014). Why Mainstream Parties Change Policy on Migration: A UK Case Study – The Conservative Party, Immigration and Asylum, 1960–2010. Comparative European Politics, 12(6), 603–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Camia, V. (2013). Mainstream Parties and their Conceptions of Europe: The Populist Contagion, Working Paper No. 60, National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR).Google Scholar
  6. Davis, A. J. (2012). The Impact of Anti-Immigration Parties on Mainstream Parties’ Immigration Positions in the Netherlands, Flanders and the UK 1987–2010: Divided Electorates, Left-Right Politics and the Pull Towards Restrictionism. Doctoral dissertation, European University Institute, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  7. Gianfreda, S. (2018). Politicization of the Refugee Crisis?: A Content Analysis of Parliamentary Debates in Italy, the UK, and the EU. Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica, 48(01), 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gray, G., & Jones, M. (2016). A Qualitative Narrative Policy Framework? Examining the Policy Narratives of US Campaign Finance Regulatory Reform. Public Policy and Administration, 31(3), 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansen, R. (2007). Migration Policy. In C. Hay & A. Menon (Eds.), European Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Harmel, R., & Svasand, L. (1997). The Influence of New Parties on Old Parties’ Platforms. The Case of the Progress Parties and Conservative Parties of Denmark and Norway. Party Politics, 3(3), 315–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hobolt, S., & Tilley, J. (2015). Fleeing the Centre: The Rise of Challenger Parties in the Aftermath of the Euro Crisis. Paper prepared for presentation at the EES 2014 Conference, November 6–8, 2015, MZES, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones, M. D., Shanahan, E. A., & McBeth, M. K. (2014). Introducing the Narrative Policy Framework. In M. D. Jones, E. A. Shanahan, & M. K. McBeth (Eds.), The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis (pp. 1–26). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., Arrendale Anderson, M. C., & Rose, B. (2012). Policy Story or Gory Story? : Narrative Policy Framework, YouTube, and Indirect Lobbying in Greater Yellowstone. Policy & Internet, 4(3–4), 159–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McElroy, G., & Benoit, K. (2007). Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament. Party Politics, 13(1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meijers, M. (2015). Contagious Euroscepticism: The Impact of Eurosceptic Support on Mainstream Party Positions on European Integration. Party Politics, 23, 1–11.Google Scholar
  17. Odmalm, P., & Bale, T. (2014). Immigration into the Mainstream: Conflicting Ideological Streams, Strategic Reasoning and Party Competition. Acta Politica, 50(4), 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Proksch, S., & Slapin, J. (2010). Position Taking in European Parliament Speeches. British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 587–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rooduijn, M., de Lange, S. L., & van der Brug, W. (2014). A Populist Zeitgeist? Programmatic Contagion by Populist Parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, 20(4), 563–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., McBeth, M. K., & Lane, R. R. (2013). An Angel on the Wind: How Heroic Policy Narratives Shape Policy Realities. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 453–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stone, D. (2012). Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: WW. Norton.Google Scholar
  22. Van Heerden, S., de Lange, S. L., van der Brug, W., & Fennema, M. (2014). The Immigration and Integration Debate in the Netherlands: Discursive and Programmatic Reactions to the Rise of Anti-Immigration Parties. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(1), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Spanje, J. (2010). Contagious Parties. Anti-Immigration Parties and Their Impact on Other Parties’ Immigration Stances in Contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics, 16(5), 563–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams, C., & Ishiyama, J. (2018). Responding to the Left: The Effect of Far-Left Parties on Mainstream Party Euroskepticism. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 32, 1–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EuropeBrugesBelgium

Personalised recommendations