Advertisement

Bringing China into the Foreign Intervention Discourse

  • Obert Hodzi
Chapter
Part of the Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific book series (CSAP)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the global discourse on intervention in foreign intrastate armed conflicts by China and other non-Western rising powers. It assesses the prevailing discourse on the topic and the emerging gaps. The main argument advanced in the chapter is that the major gap in existing scholarship is the lack of systematic theoretical and empirical study of intervention in foreign conflicts by rising powers, particularly China. The chapter advances the argument that in external intervention studies, practice has preceded theory. The focus of IR theorists has remained on “states-that-matter” such that the theories do not explain the behaviour of small or rising states. It therefore makes an argument for the use of neoclassical realism as a theoretical framework able to explain the foreign policy behaviour of rising powers.

Bibliography

  1. Armijo, L. E., & Katada, S. N. (2014). New kids on the block: Rising multipolarity, more financial statecraft. In L. E. Armijo & S. N. Katada (Eds.), The financial statecraft of emerging powers: Shield and sword in Asia and Latin America (pp. 1–20). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Armijo, L. E., & Roberts, C. (2014). The emerging powers and global governance: Why the BRICS matter. In R. E. Looney (Ed.), Handbook of emerging economies (pp. 503–524). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bayart, J. (2000). Africa in the world: A history of extraversion. African Affairs, 99(395), 217–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilgin, P. (2008). Thinking past ‘western’ IR? Third World Quarterly, 29(1), 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bull, H. (1984). Intervention in world politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Burchill, S. (2005). The national interest in international relations theory. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, S. (2012). Looking for balance: China, the United States, and power balancing in East Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Conteh-Morgan, E. (2001). International intervention: Conflict, economic dislocation, and the hegemonic role of dominant actors. International Journal of Peace Studies, 6(2), 33–52.Google Scholar
  9. Feste, K. A. (1992). Expanding the Frontiers: Superpower intervention in the cold war. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  10. Feste, K. A. (2003). Intervention: Shaping the global order. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  11. Finnemore, M. (2003). The purpose of intervention: Changing beliefs about the use of force. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fung, C. J. (2015). What explains China’s deployment to UN peacekeeping operations? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. Retrieved May 16, 2016, from http://irap.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/11/27/irap.lcv020.full.pdf+html
  13. Haass, R. N. (2008). The age of nonpolarity: What will follow US dominance. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 44–56.Google Scholar
  14. Handel, M. I. (1990). Weak states in the international system. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  15. Hurrell, A. (2006). Hegemony, liberalism and global order: What space for would-be great powers? International Affairs, 82(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). Review of saving strangers: Humanitarian intervention in international society, Wheeler, N.J. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 80, No. 6. Retrieved June 5, 2014, from http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/57287/g-john-ikenberry/saving-strangers-humanitarian-intervention-in-international-sociGoogle Scholar
  17. Ikenberry, G. J. (2010). The three faces of liberal internationalism. In A. S. Alexandroff & A. F. Cooper (Eds.), Rising states, rising institutions: Challenges for global governance (pp. 17–47). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  18. Keene, E. (2002). Beyond the anarchical society: Grotius, colonialism and order in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kennedy, P. (1987). The rise and fall of the great powers: Economic change and military power from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  20. Layne, C. (1993). The unipolar illusion: Why new great powers will rise. International Security, 17(4), 5–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, P. K., Chan, G., & Chan, L. (2012). China in Darfur: Humanitarian rule-maker or rule-taker? Review of International Studies, 38(2), 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mandelbaum, M. (1988). The fate of nations: The search for national security in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mastanduno, M. (1997). Preserving the unipolar moment: Realist theories and U.S. grand strategy after the Cold War. International Security, 21(4), 49–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mearsheimer, J. (2004). Why China’s rise will not be peaceful. Retrieved September 1, 2018, from http://mearsheimer.uchicago.edu/pdfs/A0034b.pdf
  25. Morgenthau, H. J. (1967). To intervene or not to intervene. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pang, Z. (2009). China’s non-intervention question. Global Responsibility to Protect, 1, 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Patrick, S. (2010). Irresponsible stakeholders? The difficulty of integrating rising powers. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 89, No. 6, pp. 44–53.Google Scholar
  28. Pearson, F. S. (1974). Foreign military interventions and domestic disputes. International Studies Quarterly, 18(3), 259–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reczei, L. (1971). The political aims and experiences of the small socialist states. In A. Schou & A. O. Brundtland (Eds.), Small states in international relations (pp. 71–86). New York: Wiley-Interscience Division.Google Scholar
  30. Regan, P. M. (1996). Conditions of successful third-party intervention in intrastate conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 40(2), 336–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Regilme Jr., S. S. F. (2014). The social science of human rights: The need for a ‘second image reversed’? Third World Quarterly, 35(8), 1390–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reus-Smit, C. (2013). The concept of intervention. Review of International Studies, 39(5), 1057–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosenau, J. N. (1969). Intervention as a scientific concept. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 13(2), 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schraeder, P. J. (1989). Intervention in the 1980s: U.S. foreign policy in the third world. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  35. Snyder, R. S. (2005). Bridging the realist/constructivist divide: The case of the counterrevolution in Soviet foreign policy at the end of the Cold War. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Steiner, B. H. (2004). Collective preventive diplomacy: A study in international conflict management. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  37. Taliaferro, J. W. (2004). Balancing risks: Great power intervention in the periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, I. (2007). Governance in Africa and Sino-African relations: Contradictions or confluence? Politics, 27(3), 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tillema, H. K. (1989). Foreign overt military intervention in the nuclear age. Journal of Peace Research, 26(2), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walt, S. M. (1987). The origins of alliance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  42. Weiss, T. G. (2007). Humanitarian intervention: Ideas in action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wheeler, N. J. (2000). Saving strangers: Humanitarian intervention in international society: Humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Winfield, P. H. (1932). Intervention. In Encyclopedia of the social sciences (Vol. 8, pp. 236–238). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Wing, S. D. (2016). French intervention in Mali: Strategic alliances, long-term regional presence? Small Wars & Insurgencies, 27(1), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wohlforth, W. C. (1993). The elusive balance: Power and perceptions during the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Zakaria, F. (1998). From wealth to power: The unusual origins of America’s world role. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Zakaria, F. (2008). The post-American world. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  51. Zhengyu, W., & Taylor, I. (2011). From refusal to engagement: Chinese contributions to peacekeeping in Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 29(2), 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zoellick, R. B. (2005). Whither China: From membership to responsibility? NBR Analysis, 16(4), 5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Obert Hodzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of World CulturesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations