Advertisement

ODI from BRIC Countries: A Multi-country Empirical Analysis

  • Valeria Gattai
  • Rajssa Mechelli
  • Piergiovanna Natale
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we study firm performance and Outward Direct Investment (ODI) from Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRIC) through a multi-country econometric analysis. First, we present our firm-level data, highlighting distinctive features of the ORBIS database that make it particularly suitable for our purposes. Second, we introduce our taxonomy of ODI, detailing the different classes of ODI involvement that mark our main departure from the literature. Third, we study the ODI involvement and the ODI-performance nexus of BRIC enterprises through econometric analysis. Econometric models and specifications are described in detail and estimation results are presented with the help of summarizing tables. This strategy helps in commenting on the empirical evidence and drawing robust regularities from a multi-country perspective. First, BRIC firms engaged in ODI are in the minority. Second, within the group of investors, those firms having more than five foreign subsidiaries, investing in developing countries, or operating in joint ventures are in the minority. Third, the best performing firms engage in ODI. Fourth, within the group of investors, the best performing firms are more likely to rely on a large number of foreign subsidiaries, and less likely to invest in developing countries alone, or to operate exclusively in joint ventures.

Keywords

ODI Firm performance Firm-level data Heterogeneous firms BRIC Econometric analysis 

References

  1. Aw, B. J., & Lee, Y. (2008). Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice for Taiwanese Multinationals. Journal of International Economics, 75, 67–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Castellani, D., Mariotti, I., & Piscitello, L. (2008). The Impact of Outward Investments on Parent Company’s Employment and Skill Composition. Evidence from the Italian Case. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19, 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Damijan, J. P., Polanec, S., & Prasnikar, J. (2007). Outward FDI and Productivity: Micro-Evidence from Slovenia. World Economy, 30, 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demirbas, D., Patnaik, I., & Shah, A. (2013). Graduating to Globalisation: A Study of Southern Multinationals. Indian Growth and Development Review, 6, 242–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Sorensen, B. E., Villegas-Sanchez, C., et al. (2015). How to Construct Nationally Representative Firm Level Data from the ORBIS Global Database. CEPR Discussion Papers 10829.Google Scholar
  6. Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Raff, H., Ryan, M., & Stahler, F. (2009). Whole vs. Shared Ownership of Foreign Affiliates. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27, 572–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valeria Gattai
    • 1
  • Rajssa Mechelli
    • 2
  • Piergiovanna Natale
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly
  2. 2.Catholic University of the Sacred HeartMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations