Advertisement

Literature Review, Theory, and Methods

  • Mujtaba Ali Isani
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides the literature review and theory that underpin the book. The literature review focuses on the social legitimacy of international and regional organizations, with a special emphasis on the well-developed literature of public opinion toward the EU. Four main clusters of explanation emerge from the literature regarding public opinion formation, namely values, utilitarian explanations, domestic cues, and hegemonic perceptions. The chapter also contrasts this literature with findings on public opinion toward the Caliphate. Finally, it outlines the datasets and methods used in the book. Having fielded surveys in problematic contexts such as Pakistan and Egypt, this book provides new data that set it apart from works relying only on secondary sources. In addition, as this project has entailed several field research trips to collect qualitative data, the insights from these qualitative studies can contextualize and enhance the understanding of the quantitative, large-n data herein.

Keywords

Social legitimacy Caliphate International organization Survey Fieldwork 

References

  1. Al-Kandari, A., & Gaither, T. K. (2011). Arabs, the West and public relations: A critical/cultural study of Arab cultural values. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 266–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrosio, T. (2008). Catching the ‘Shanghai spirit’: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization promotes authoritarian norms in Central Asia. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(8), 1321–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bellin, E. (2008). Faith in politics: New trends in the study of religion and politics. World Politics, 60(2), 315–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, L. (2014). Foreign policies or culture: What shapes Muslim public opinion on political violence against the United States? Journal of Peace Research, 51(6), 782–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaydes, L., & Linzer, D. A. (2012). Elite competition, religiosity, and anti-Americanism in the Islamic world. American Political Science Review, 106(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boomgaarden, H. G., Andreas, R. T., Schuck, M. E., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU support. European Union Politics, 12(2), 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boukhars, A. (2011). The Arab revolutions for dignity. American Foreign Policy Interests, 33(2), 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer, P. R., & Gross, K. (2005). Values, framing, and citizens’ thoughts about policy issues: Effects on content and quantity. Political Psychology, 26(6), 929–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchanan, A. (2010). Human rights, legitimacy, and the use of force. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Charmaz, K. (2001). Grounded theory. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations (pp. 335–352). Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  11. Chiozza, G. (2007). Disaggregating anti-Americanism: An analysis of individual attitudes toward the United States. In P. Katzenstein & R. Keohane (Eds.), Anti-Americanisms in world politics (pp. 93–126). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chiozza, G. (2009). A crisis like no other? Anti-Americanism at the time of the Iraq War. European Journal of International Relations, 15(2), 257–289.Google Scholar
  13. Choueiri, Y. (1996). The political discourse of contemporary Islamist movements. In A. Sidhamed & A. Ehteshami (Eds.), Islamic fundamentalism (pp. 19–33). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dellmuth, L., & Tallberg, J. (2015). The social legitimacy of international organisations: Interest representation, institutional performance, and confidence extrapolation in the United Nations. Review of International Studies, 41(3), 451–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards, M. S. (2009). Public support for the international economic organizations: Evidence from developing countries. The Review of International Organizations, 4(2), 185–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Esposito, J. L., & Mogahed, D. (2007). Who speaks for Islam? What a billion Muslims really think. Washington, DC: Gallup Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fair, C., Ramsay, C., & Kull, S. (2008). Pakistani public opinion on democracy, Islamist militancy, and relations with the US. Washington, DC: WorldPublicOpinion.org and United States Institute of Peace Working Paper. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/February2008.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2016.
  18. Feldman, S. (2003). Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477–508). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fish, M. S. (2011). Are Muslims distinctive? A look at the evidence. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  20. Flores, T. E., & Nooruddin, I. (2016). Elections in hard times: Building stronger democracies in the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Furia, P. A., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). Determinants of Arab public opinion on foreign relations. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 585–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Furia, P. A., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Arab Muslim attitudes toward the West: Cultural, social, and political explanations. International Interactions, 34(2), 186–207.Google Scholar
  23. Ginges, J., Ian, H., & Norenzayan, A. (2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20(2), 224–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goetz, A. M., Scholte, J. A., & Williams, M. (2000). Contesting global governance: Multilateral economic institutions and global social movements. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Harteveld, E., van der Meer, T., & De Vries, C. E. (2013). In Europe we trust? Exploring three logics of trust in the European Union. European Union Politics, 14(4), 542–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hashemi, N. (2013). The Arab Spring two years on: Reflections on dignity, democracy, and devotion. Ethics and International Affairs, 27(02), 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29.  https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a.
  28. Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huntington, S. P. (1997). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New Delhi: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  30. Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1987). How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1099–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., & Puranen B. et al. (Eds.). (2014). World values survey: All rounds - country-pooled. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.
  33. Isani, M., & Schlipphak, B. (2017). In the EU we trust: European Muslim attitudes toward the European Union. European Union Politics, 18(4), 658–677.Google Scholar
  34. Jamal, A. A., & Tessler, M. A. (2008). Attitudes in the Arab world. Journal of Democracy, 19(1), 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jhee, B. K. (2009). Public support for regional integration in Northeast Asia: An empirical test of affective and utilitarian models. International Political Science Review, 30(1), 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson, T. (2011). Guilt by association: The link between states’ influence and the legitimacy of intergovernmental organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 6(1), 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaltenthaler, K., Miller, W. J., Ceccoli, S., & Gelleny, R. (2010). The sources of Pakistani attitudes toward religiously motivated terrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 33(9), 815–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kedourie, E. (1994). Democracy and Arab political culture. London, UK: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  39. Kwon, H. Y. (2011). Globalization, cultural openness, and public preferences for East Asian economic integration in South Korea. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(1), 2–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lenz, T., & Viola, L. A. (2017). Legitimacy and institutional change in international organisations: A cognitive approach. Review of International Studies, 43(5), 939–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Machida, S. (2009). Globalization and the legitimacy of intergovernmental organizations. International Studies, 46(4), 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mansfield, E. D., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Support for free trade: Self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. International Organization, 63(3), 425–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Petito, F., & Hatzopoulos, P. (2003). Religion in international relations: The return from exile. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Philpott, D. (2009). Has the study of global politics found religion? Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rasheed, M. Al., Kersten, C., & Shterin, M. (2012). Demystifying the caliphate: Historical memory and contemporary contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Reetz, D. (2009). Migrants, mujahidin, madrassa students: The diversity of transnational Islam in Pakistan. In P. Mandaville, F. A. Noor, A. Horstmann, D. Reetz, A. Riaz, A. Roul, N. Hasan, A. F. A. Hamid, R. C. Banlaoi, & J. C. Liow (Eds.), Transnational Islam in South and Southeast Asia: Movements, networks, and conflict dynamics (pp. 53–78). http://muse.jhu.edu/book/21740. Accessed 18 Aug 2016.
  47. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  48. Scheve, K. F., & Slaughter, M. J. (2001). What determines individual trade-policy preferences? Journal of International Economics, 54(2), 267–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schlipphak, B. (2015). Measuring attitudes toward regional organizations outside Europe. The Review of International Organizations, 10, 1–25.Google Scholar
  50. Snyder, J. L. (2011). Religion and international relations theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Spradley, J. P. (2016). The ethnographic interview. Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
  52. Telhami, S. (1993). Arab public opinion and the Gulf War. Political Science Quarterly, 108(3), 437–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Telhami, S. (2003). A view from the Arab world: A survey in five countries. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  54. Telhami, S. (2013). The world through Arab eyes: Arab public opinion and the reshaping of the Middle East. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  55. Tessler, M. (2002). Islam and democracy in the Middle East: The impact of religious orientations on attitudes toward democracy in four Arab countries. Comparative Politics, 34(3), 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tessler, M. (2003). Arab and Muslim political attitudes: Stereotypes and evidence from survey research. International Studies Perspectives, 4(2), 175–181.Google Scholar
  57. Tessler, M. (2010). Religion, religiosity and the place of Islam in political life: Insights from the Arab Barometer surveys. Middle East Law and Governance, 2(2), 221–252.Google Scholar
  58. Tessler, M., & Gao, E. (2005). Gauging Arab support for democracy. Journal of Democracy, 16(3), 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Toft, M. D., Philpott, D., & Shah, T. S. (2011). God’s century: Resurgent religion and global politics. New York and London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  60. Wald, K. D., & Wilcox, C. (2006). Getting religion: Has political science rediscovered the faith factor? American Political Science Review, 100(4), 523–529.Google Scholar
  61. Zayani, M. (2008). Courting and containing the Arab street: Arab public opinion, the Middle East and US public diplomacy. Arab Studies Quarterly, 30(2), 45–64.Google Scholar
  62. Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(1), 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mujtaba Ali Isani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany

Personalised recommendations