Advertisement

The Influence of Woman’s Mastectomy on Breathing Kinematics

  • Frantisek Lopot
  • David Ravnik
  • Klara Koudelkova
  • Petr Kubovy
  • Petr StastnyEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 831)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to objectively determine the effect of total mastectomy on the extent of breathing movements of the thoracic and abdominal wall in the women (n = 6) who underwent this operation, compared to the breath movements of healthy women. Another aim is to find out whether there has been a symmetrical disturbance of the extent of movement between the operated and unoperated side of the chest and abdomen during breathing.

The 3D optoelectronic kinematic analyzer (Qualisys) has been used to measure the range of breathing movements. The chest mobility was measured in a calm and deep breathing. Further data on the patient’s condition were obtained through a kinesiological analysis focused on the upper half of the body.

The mastectomy affects the extent of breathing movements in women who have undergone this operation, by generally reducing the range of breathing movements on the operative side of the fuselage. For this reason, the symmetry of the range of movements (ROM) between the operated and unoperated sides during breathing is also impaired. The most striking asymmetries are present approximately on the level of 5th ribs, where the postoperative scar is also the most common. These findings have been confirmed in both quiet and deep breathing, demonstrating our claim to the need for scar care.

Keywords

Respiratory movements Total mastectomy Breast cancer Scar Qualisys 

References

  1. 1.
    Cerda, E.: Mechanics of scars. J. Biomech. 38, 1598–1603 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vránová, H., Zeman, J., Čech, Z., Otáhal, S.: Identification of viscoelastic parameters of skin with a scar in vivo, influence of soft tissue technique on changes of skin parameters. J. Bodyw. Mov. Therap. 13, 344–349 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Véle, F.K.: Přehled kineziologie a patokineziologie pro diagnostiku a terapii poruch pohybové soustavy. 2. vyd. Triton, Praha (2006). 375 str. ISBN 80-7254-837-9Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ehara, Y., Fujimoto, H., Miyazaki, S., Mochimaru, M., Tanaka, S., Yamamoto, S.: Comparison of the performance of 3D camera systems II. Gait Posture 5, 251–255 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Richards, J.G.: The measurement of human motion: a comparison of commercially available systems. Hum. Mov. Sci. 18, 589–602 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu, H., Holt, C., Evans, S.: Accuracy and repeatability of an optical motion analysis system for measuring small deformations of biological tissues. J. Biomech. 40, 210–214 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Research Methods in Education. Routledge, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kenyon, C., Cala, S., Yan, S., Aliverti, A., Scano, G., Duranti, R., et al.: Rib cage mechanics during quiet breathing and exercise in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 83, 1242–1255 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Groote, A., Wantier, M., Chéron, G., Estenne, M., Paiva, M.: Chest wall motion during tidal breathing. J. Appl. Physiol. 83, 1531–1537 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaneko, H., Horie, J.: Breathing movements of the chest and abdominal wall in healthy subjects. Respir. Care 57, 1442–1451 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ragnarsdóttir, M., Kristinsdóttir, E.K.: Breathing movements and breathing patterns among healthy men and women 20–69 years of age. Respiration 73, 48–54 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kristjánsdóttir, Á., Ragnarsdóttir, M., Hannesson, P., Beck, H.J., Torfason, B.: Respiratory movements are altered three months and one year following cardiac surgery. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 38, 98–103 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rostkowska, E., Bak, M., Samborski, W.: Body posture in women after mastectomy and its changes as a result of rehabilitation. Adv. Med. Sci. 51, 287–297 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crosbie, J., Kilbreath, S.L., Dylke, E., Refshauge, K.M., Nicholson, L.L., Beith, J.M., et al.: Effects of mastectomy on shoulder and spinal kinematics during bilateral upper-limb movement. Phys. Ther. 90, 679–692 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arndt, V., Stegmaier, C., Ziegler, H., Brenner, H.: A population-based study of the impact of specific symptoms on quality of life in women with breast cancer 1 year after diagnosis. Cancer 107, 2496–2503 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hayes, S.C., Rye, S., Battistutta, D., Newman, B.: Prevalence of upper-body symptoms following breast cancer and its relationship with upper-body function and lymphoedema. Lymphology 43, 178–187 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McLaughlin, S.A., Wright, M.J., Morris, K.T., Giron, G.L., Sampson, M.R., Brockway, J.P., et al.: Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 5213–5219 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lewit, K., Olsanska, S.: Clinical importance of active scars: abnormal scars as a cause of myofascial pain. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 27, 399–402 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frantisek Lopot
    • 1
  • David Ravnik
    • 2
  • Klara Koudelkova
    • 1
  • Petr Kubovy
    • 1
  • Petr Stastny
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Physical Education and SportCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.University of PrimorskaLublanSlovenia

Personalised recommendations