Trabecular Bone Microstructural FEM Analysis for Out-Of Plane Resolution Change

  • Artur CichańskiEmail author
  • Krzysztof Nowicki
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 831)


The paper presents comparison of two methods of voxel defining for trabecular bone structure modelling. Regular cubic voxels were considered, the size of which changed uniformly in three mutually perpendicular directions depending on the adopted resolution. Also elongated rectangular voxels were proposed, characterized with fixed in-plane resolution and variable length along out-of plane direction. For both types of voxels a number of analyses were performed using finite element method with structures of varied BV/TV values. It was stated that voxel dimension change in out-of plane direction allows for decreasing of a number of scans required for correct reflect of the modelled structure stiffness for the needs of numerical analyses.


Trabecular bone structure Apparent stiffness \(\mu \)FEM 


  1. 1.
    Topoliński, T., Cichański, A., Mazurkiewicz, A., Nowicki, K.: Microarchitecture parameters describe bone structure and its strength better than BMD. Sci. World J. 502781, 1–7 (2012). Article ID 502781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Depalle, B., Chapurlat, R., Walter-Le-Berre, H., Bou-Said, B., Follet, H.: Finite element dependence of stress evaluation for human trabecular bone. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 18, 200–212 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ulrich, D., van Rietbergen, B., Weinans, H., Ruegsegger, P.: Finite element analysis of trabecular bone structure: a comparison of image-based meshing techniques. J. Biomech. 31(12), 1187–1192 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyd, S.K., Muller, R.: Smooth surface meshing for automated finite element model generation from 3D image data. J. Biomech. 39(7), 1287–1295 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Topoliński, T., Cichański, A., Mazurkiewicz, A., Nowicki, K.: The relationship between trabecular bone structure modeling methods and the elastic modulus as calculated by FEM. Sci. World J. 2012, 1–9 (2012). Article ID 827196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harrison, N.M., McDonnell, P.F., OMahoney, D.C., Kennedy, O.D., OBrien, F.J., McHugh, P.E.: Heterogeneous linear elastic trabecular bone modelling using micro-CT attenuation data and experimentally measured heterogeneous tissue properties. J. Biomech. 41(11), 2589–2596 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bardyn, T., Reyes, M., Larrea, X., Buchler, P.: Influence of Smoothing on Voxel-Based Mesh Accuracy in Micro-Finite Element. Springer, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cichański, A., Nowicki, K.: Morphological dilation as the method of mineral fraction loss compensation in reconstruction of trabecular bone structure. In: Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Engineering Mechanics 2016, pp. 114–117 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cichański, A., Nowicki, K., Mazurkiewicz, A., Topoliński, T.: Investigation of statistical relationships between quantities describing bone architecture, its fractal dimensions and mechanical properties. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 12(4), 69–77 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boutroy, S., Van Rietbergen, B., Sornay-Rendu, E., Munoz, F., Bouxsein, M.L., Delmas, P.D.: Finite element analysis based on in vivo HR-pQCT images of the distal radius is associated with wrist fracture in postmenopausal women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 23(3), 392–399 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bevill, G., Keaveny, T.M.: Trabecular bone strength predictions using finite element analysis of micro-scale images at limited spatial resolution. Bone 44(4), 579–584 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Technology and Live Sciences in BydgoszczBydgoszczPoland

Personalised recommendations