Advertisement

FEM Analysis of Hyperelastic Behavior of Pig’s Skin with Anatomical Site Consideration

  • Sylwia ŁaganEmail author
  • Agnieszka Chojnacka-Brożek
  • Aneta Liber-Kneć
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 831)

Abstract

The aim of this work was to compare a hyperelastic material models (Ogden and Yeoh) implemented in ANSYS software to evaluate the experimental data obtained from uniaxial tensile test of pig’s skin taken from different location of the body (back and abdomen). The results were compared with the literature data. The effects of the simulation confirmed the possibility of using hyperelastic models to assess skin properties using FEM methods based on a static tensile test. The study reveals the need to validate results based on a wider range of data.

Keywords

Tensile test Non-linear static analysis FEM Correlation of mechanical properties Soft tissue 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The work was realized due to statutory activities M-1/12/2018/DS.

References

  1. 1.
    Benitez, J.M., Montans, F.J.: The mechanical behavior of skin: Structures and models for the finite element analysis. Comput. Struct. 190, 75–107 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chanda, A., Graeter, R., Unnikrishnan, V.: Effect of blasts on subject-specific computational models of skin and bone sections at various locations on the human body. AIMS Mater. Sci. 2(4), 425–447 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flynn, C., Taberner, A., Nielsen, P.: Mechanical characterisation of in vivo human skin using a 3d force-sensitive micro-robot and finite element analysis. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 10(1), 27–38 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ni Annaidh, A.N., Bruyere, K., Destrade, M., Gilchrist, M.D., Maurini, C., Ottenio, M., Saccomandi, G.: Automated estimation of collagen fiber dispersion in the dermis and its contribution to the anisotropic behavior of skin. Annal. Biomed. Eng. 40(8), 1666–1678 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lapeer, R.J., Gassona, D., Karri, V.: Simulating plastic surgery: from human skin tensile tests, through hyperelastic finite element models to real-time haptics. Progress Biophys. Mol. Biol. 103(2–3), 208–216 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liber-Kneć, A., Łagan, S.: Factors influencing on mechanical properties of porcine skin obtained in tensile test-preliminary studies. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 623, 255–262 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Łagan, S., Liber-Kneć, A.: Application of the ogden model to the tensile stress-strain behavior of the pig’s. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 526, 145–152 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Łagan, S., Liber-Kneć, A.: Experimental testing and constitutive modeling of the mechanical properties of the swine skin tissue. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 19(2), 93–102 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Łagan, S., Liber-Kneć, A.: Influence of strain rates on the hyperelastic material models parameters of pig skin tissue. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 623, 279–287 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martins, P., Jorge, R.N., Ferreira, A.: A comparative study of several material models for prediction of hyperelastic properties: application to silicone-rubber and soft tissues. Strain 42, 135–147 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Remache, D., Caliez, M., Gratton, M., Dos Santos, S.: The effects of cyclic tensile and stress-relaxation tests on porcine skin. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 77, 242–249 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wex, C., Arndt, S., Stoll, A., Bruns, C., Kupriyanova, Y.: Isotropic incompressible hyperelastic models for modeling the mechanical behaviour of biological tissues: a review. BioMed. Eng/Biomedizinische Technik. 60(6), 577–592 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylwia Łagan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Agnieszka Chojnacka-Brożek
    • 1
  • Aneta Liber-Kneć
    • 1
  1. 1.Cracow University of TechnologyCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations