Advertisement

What Is at Stake in Localizing Human Security Norms in the ASEAN+3?: A Comparative Analysis of 11 Qualitative Regional Review Surveys

  • Oscar A. Gómez
Chapter
Part of the Security, Development and Human Rights in East Asia book series (SDHRP)

Abstract

This chapter provides a comparative analysis of the 11 case studies in the book. Overall, the most conspicuous finding is a peculiar interaction between the people and the state, in which generalized paternalism and expectations that the state will take care of the needs of the people are often embraced. While this could be viewed as a feature of Eastern political culture, as several authors suggest, the chapter proposes different explanations that can be extracted from the survey. From the perspective of the study of human security theory and practice, it is somewhat surprising to find scarce and conflicting elaborations of empowerment and its relationship with protection; that being said, overall it is comforting to find support for pragmatism over conceptual distinctions.

References

  1. Acharya, Amitav. 2004. How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization 58 (2): 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. CHS (Commission on Human Security). 2003. Human Security Now. New York: Commission on Human Security.Google Scholar
  3. Deng, Francis, Sandikiel Kimaro, Terrence Lyons, Donald Rothchild, and I. William Zartman. 1996. Sovereignty as Responsibility: Conflict Management in Africa. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  4. Gómez, Oscar A. 2014. What Can the Human Development Approach Tell Us about Crisis? An Exploration. International Journal of Social Quality 4 (2): 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2015. Alternative Views of Security in Latin America: Towards a Global Contribution to Human Security. Regions and Cohesion 5 (1): 26–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gómez, Oscar A., and Des Gasper. 2013. Human Security Guidance Note, Human Development Report Office. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  7. Gómez, Oscar A., Des Gasper, and Yoichi Mine. 2013. Good Practices in Addressing Human Security Through Human Development Reports, Report for the Human Development Report Office. New York: UNDP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2016. Moving Development and Security Narratives a Step Further: Human Security in the Human Development Reports. Journal of Development Studies 52 (1): 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hernandez, Carolina, Eun Mee Kim, Yoichi Mine, and Ren Xiao, eds. 2018. Human Security and Cross-Border Cooperation in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Human Security Study Group. 2004. A Human Security Doctrine for Europe. The Barcelona Report of the Study Group on Europe’s Security Capabilities. http://www.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/research/CSHS/humanSecurity/barcelonaReport.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
  11. ———. 2007. A European Way of Security. The Madrid Report of the Human Security Study Group. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/40207/1/A_European_Way_of_Security%28author%29.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2017.
  12. ———. 2010. Helsinki Plus: Towards a Human Security Architecture for Europe. The First Report of the EU-Russia Human Security Study Group. http://www.lse.ac.uk/internationalDevelopment/research/CSHS/humanSecurity/HelsinkiPlusEnglish.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2017.
  13. ———. 2016. From Hybrid Peace to Human Security: Rethinking EU Strategy Towards Conflict. The Berlin Report of the Human Security Study Group. https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/file/424/download?token=VFwH62WJ. Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
  14. Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kaldor, Mary, Mary Martin, and Sabine Selchow. 2007. Human Security: A New Strategic Narrative for Europe. International Affairs 83 (2): 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. Cultural Norms and National Security. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sen, Amartya. 1999. Human Rights and Economic Achievements, Chapter 4. In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, ed. Joanne R. Bauer and Daniel A. Bell. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Umegaki, Michio. 2009. Introduction: East Asia in a Human Security Perspective. In Human Insecurity in East Asia, ed. Michio Umegaki, Lynn Thiesmeyer, and Atsushi Watabe, 1–19. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  20. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 1994. Human Development Report 1994: New Dimensions of Human Security. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1998. Chile Human Development Report—Paradoxes of Modernity: Human Security. Santiago: UNDP.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2001. Macedonia Human Development Report—Social Exclusion and Human Insecurity in the FYR Macedonia. Skopje: UNDP.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research InstituteJapan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations