Advertisement

Introduction: An Approach to Placental Pathology

  • T. Yee KhongEmail author
  • Eoghan E. Mooney
  • Sanne J. Gordijn
  • Terry K. Morgan
  • Peter G. J. Nikkels
Chapter

Abstract

The reasons and diagnostic challenges of a pathological examination of the placenta are discussed briefly. This chapter outlines a topographical approach to such an examination. The clinical relevance of placental examination is discussed also. Suggestions are presented of how more robust evidence of clinical significance can be obtained. Interactions between placental pathology, basic science research and clinical correlation will enhance the value of placental pathology.

Keywords

Gross examination Macroscopic findings Histopathology Mother Neonate Fetus Basic science Clinical correlation Evidence Report 

References

  1. 1.
    Boyd JD, Hamilton WJ. The human placenta. Cambridge: Heffer and Sons; 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hasson J, Tulandi T, Son WY, et al. Reproductive outcomes of familial oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:1696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van der Hoorn ML, Scherjon SA, Claas FH. Egg donation pregnancy as an immunological model for solid organ transplantation. Transpl Immunol. 2011;25:89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holtan SG, Creedon DJ, Haluska P, Markovic SN. Cancer and pregnancy: parallels in growth, invasion, and immune modulation and implications for cancer therapeutic agents. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:985–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Piechowski J. Trophoblastic-like transdifferentiation: a key to oncogenesis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;101:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barker DJ, Thornburg KL. Placental programming of chronic diseases, cancer and lifespan: a review. Placenta. 2013;34:841–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang KT. Examination of the placenta: medico-legal implications. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19:279–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MacLennan AH, Thompson SC, Gecz J. Cerebral palsy: causes, pathways, and the role of genetic variants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:779–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khong TY, Ting M, Gordijn SJ. Placental pathology and clinical trials: histopathology data from prior and study pregnancies may improve analysis. Placenta. 2017;52:58–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun CC, Revell VO, Belli AJ, Viscardi RM. Discrepancy in pathologic diagnosis of placental lesions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126:706–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khong TY, Mooney EE, Ariel I, et al. Sampling and definitions of placental lesions: Amsterdam placental workshop group consensus statement. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140:698–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stanek J, Biesiada J. Clustering of maternal-fetal clinical conditions and outcomes and placental lesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:493.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spencer MK, Khong TY. Conformity to guidelines for pathologic examination of the placenta. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:205–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Redline RW. The clinical implications of placental diagnoses. Sem Perinatol. 2015;39:2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frank CM, Nikkels PG, Harteman JC, et al. Placental pathology and outcome after perinatal asphyxia and therapeutic hypothermia. J Perinatol. 2016;36:977–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harteman JC, Nikkels PG, Benders MJ, et al. Placental pathology in full-term infants with hypoxic-ischemic neonatal encephalopathy and association with magnetic resonance imaging pattern of brain injury. J Pediatr. 2013;163:968–95.e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khong TY, Gordijn SJ. Quality of placental pathology reports. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003;6:54–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Turowski G, Berge LN, Helgadottir LB, Jacobsen E-M, Roald B. A new, clinically oriented, unifying and simple placental classification system. Placenta. 2012;33:1026–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Walsh CA, McAuliffe FM, Turowski G, Roald B, Mooney EE. A survey of obstetricians' views on placental pathology reporting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;121:275–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sebire NJ. Implications of placental pathology for disease mechanisms; methods, issues and future approaches. Placenta. 2017;52:122–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marchevsky AM, Wick MR. Evidence-based medicine, medical decision analysis, and pathology. Hum Pathol. 2004;35:1179–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen B, Duan J, Chabot-Lecoanet AC, et al. Ex vivo magnetic resonance angiography to explore placental vascular anatomy. Placenta. 2017;58:40–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leavey K, Benton SJ, Grynspan D, et al. Gene markers of normal villous maturation and their expression in placentas with maturational pathology. Placenta. 2017;58:52–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weel IC, Baergen RN, Romao-Veiga M, et al. Association between placental lesions, cytokines and angiogenic factors in pregnant women with preeclampsia. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Parnell LA, Briggs CM, Cao B, et al. Microbial communities in placentas from term normal pregnancy exhibit spatially variable profiles. Sci Rep. 2017;7:11200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roberts VH, Lo JO, Salati JA, et al. Quantitative assessment of placental perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in macaques and human subjects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:369.e1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Yee Khong
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Eoghan E. Mooney
    • 3
  • Sanne J. Gordijn
    • 4
  • Terry K. Morgan
    • 5
  • Peter G. J. Nikkels
    • 6
  1. 1.SA PathologyWomen’s and Children’s HospitalNorth AdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineNational Maternity HospitalDublinIreland
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Center GroningenUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Department of PathologyOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  6. 6.Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Center UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations