Advertisement

Official Co-production: Policy Instruments and Imperatives

  • Julia Hammett-Jamart
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave European Film and Media Studies book series (PEFMS)

Abstract

The practice of co-production occurs at the nexus of national and international policy jurisdictions, between cultural and commercial policy imperatives, pitting the reflex to protect against the desire to expand. As such it unsettles many preconceived notions about national cinema. This article focuses on the particular type of co-production which most embodies these points of tension—official co-production. It explains the complex, multi-dimensional policy framework within which official co-production occurs, the challenges it raises for public policy and the manner in which these are negotiated by industry partners.

References

  1. 2001. Agreement between the Government of the French Republic and the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany. In French Decree No. 2002-738 of 30 April 2002, ed. French Official Gazette of 4 May 2002. Cannes.Google Scholar
  2. Ahearne, Jeremy. 2002. French Cultural Policy Debates: A Reader. In Routledge Harwood Studies in Cultural Policy, ed. Jim McGuigan and Oliver Bennett. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bertrand, Ina, and William D. Routt. 1989. The Big Bad Combine: Some Aspects of National Aspirations and International Constraints in the Australian Cinema 1896–1929. In The Australian Screen, ed. Albert Moran and Tom O’Regan, 3–27. Melbourne: Penguin.Google Scholar
  4. British Film Institute. 2018. British Film Certification: Co-production Guidance Notes. ed. Culture Media & Sport Department for Digital.Google Scholar
  5. Cordaiy, Hunter. 1989. Travels to the End of the Night: Ian Pringle and ‘The Prisoner of St. Petersburg’. Cinema Papers (73): 32–34.Google Scholar
  6. Council of Europe. 1992. European Convention on Cinematographic Co-production. In Council of Europe Treaty Series – No. 147. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  7. Council of Europe. 2017. Council of Europe Convention on Cinematographic Co-production (revised). In Council of Europe Treaty Series – No. 220. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
  8. Fansten, Michel. 2002. Le cinéma français face a l’évolution téchnologique et à la transformation des marchés. In Réalisations et Recherches Audiovisuelles. Paris: Le Senat Français.Google Scholar
  9. Goldsmith, Ben. 2002. Cultural Diversity, Cultural Networks and Trade: International Cultural Policy Debate. Media International Australia (102): 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldsmith, Ben, and Tom O’Regan. 2005. The Film Studio: Film Production in the Global Economy. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2008. International Film Production: Interests and Motivations. In Cross-border Cultural Production: Economic Runaway Or Globalisation? ed. Janet Wasko and Mary Erickson, 13–24. New York: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hammett-Jamart, Julia. 2004. Regulating Diversity: Cultural Diversity, National Film Policy and the International Co-production of Films. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy 111 (Culture, Trade, Services): 46–62.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2014. Trade in National Cinema: Australian Film Policy Implementation on French-Australian Official Coproductions 1986–2006. PhD thesis, School of Social Sciences Media and Communication, University of Wollongong.Google Scholar
  14. Hjort, Mette. 2009. On the Plurality of Cinematic Transnationalism. In World Cinemas, Transnational Perspectives, ed. N. Durovicova and K. Newman. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Hjort, Mette, and Scott Mackenzie, eds. 2000. Cinema and Nation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Jäckel, Anne. 2003. European Film Industries. London: BFI.Google Scholar
  17. MacDonnell, Justin. 1992. Arts Minister? Government Policy and the Arts. Sydney: Currency Press.Google Scholar
  18. Marmion, Yves. 1990. Internal Memorandum to Dominique Wallon. In Centre National de la Cinématographie. Paris.Google Scholar
  19. Moran, Albert. 1996. Film Policy: International, National and Regional Perspectives. In Culture: Policies and Politics, ed. Tony Bennett, Jennifer Craik, Ian Hunter, Colin Mercer and Dugald Williamson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Moran, Albert, and Tom O’Regan, eds. 1985. An Australian Film Reader, Australian Screen. Sydney: Currency Press.Google Scholar
  21. Morawetz, Norbert, Jane Hardy, Colin Haslam, and Keith Randle. 2007. Finance, Policy and Industrial Dynamics: The Rise of Co-productions in the Film Industry. Industry and Innovation 14 (4): 421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murray, Scott. 1990. Ian Pringle: In for the Long Haul. Cinema Papers (81): 6–13.Google Scholar
  23. Puttnam, David. 1997. The Undeclared War: The Struggle for Control of the World’s Film Industry. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  24. Rival, Pierre. 1988. Wim Wenders ira-t-il Jusqu’au bout du Monde? Le Film Francais 2212: 4–7, 31.Google Scholar
  25. Rivi, Luisa. 2007. European Cinema After 1989: Cultural Identity and Transnational Production. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, Bec. 2004. Rumble in the Jungle. Inside Film 63: 20–22.Google Scholar
  27. Szczepanik, Petr. 2016. Transnational Crews and the Post-socialist Precarity: Globalizing Screen Media Labor in Prague. In Precarious Creativity: Global Media, Local Labor, ed. Michael Curtin and Kevin Sanson, 88–103. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  28. Talavera, Julio. 2017. Film Production in Europe: Production Volume, Co-production and Worldwide Circulation. Strasbourg: European Audiovisual Observatory.Google Scholar
  29. The Green Card Production Company Inc. 1990. Additional Information: Actors with French Passports. Paris.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson, Kristin, and David Bordwell. 1994. Film History: An Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  31. UNESCO. 2005. Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. Edited by UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.Google Scholar
  32. Urban, Andrew. 2004. The Dead Sloth Incident: Interview with Rolf de Heer. Urban Cinefile. Accessed February 24, 2011. http://www.urbancinefile.com.au/home/view.asp?a=8502&s=Interviews
  33. de Waresquiel, Emmanuel, ed. 2001. Dictionnaire des politiques culturelles de la France depuis 1959. Paris: CNRS Editions.Google Scholar
  34. World Trade Organisation. 2018. Principles of the Trading System. Accessed April 9. https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/fact2_e.htm.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Hammett-Jamart
    • 1
  1. 1.Co-production Research NetworkParisFrance

Personalised recommendations