Abstract
To assess children’s individual stages of mathematical development, as well as their developmental trajectories, different diagnostic approaches have been developed. Based on the test results of such approaches, children with mathematics learning difficulties are identified and programs to enhance mathematical learning can be developed and evaluated. In this chapter, quality characteristics of assessment are described (reliability, objectivity, validity, and provision of norms). Different categories are presented to classify approaches to assessing mathematical competence and performance (norm-referenced versus not-norm-referenced tests, individual versus group testing, paper-and-pencil tests versus interviews versus computer-based tests, chronological versus educational age–oriented tests, speed versus power tests, and principles of task selection). Drawing on selected approaches, different principles of task selection are discussed (curriculum-based, based on neuropsychology theories, or based on developmental psychology theories) together with their consequences for the interpretation of respective test results. Finally, some promising research trends are outlined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aunio, P. (2006). Number sense in young children—international group differences and an intervention programme for children with low and average performance (research report 269). Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki.
ASER Centre. (2017). In ASER Centre (Ed.), Annual status of education report (rural) 2016. New Delhi, India.
Butterworth, B. (2003). Dyscalculia screener. London: NFER-Nelson.
Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. H., & Liu, X. H. (2008). Development of a measure of early mathematics achievement using the Rasch model: the research-based early maths assessment. Educational Psychology, 28, 457–482.
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83–120.
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1–42.
Dellatolas, G., von Aster, M., Willardino-Braga, L., Meier, M., & Deloche, G. (2000). Number processing and mental calculation in school children aged 7 to 10 years: transcultural comparison. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 102–110.
Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: the emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: a review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 121–139.
Fritz, A., Ehlert, A., Ricken, G., & Balzer, L. (2017). Mathematik und Rechenkonzepte im ersten Schuljahr – Diagnose (MARKO-D1+) [Assessment of math concepts in first graders—diagnosis (MARKO-D1+)]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Fritz, A., Ehlert, A., & Balzer, L. (2013). Development of mathematical concepts as basis for an elaborated mathematical understanding. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 3, 38–67.
Fritz, A., & Ricken, G. (2008). Rechenschwäche [Mathematics learning difficulties]. München, Germany: Reinhardt.
Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Monitoring basic skills progress: math computation. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Fuson, C. K. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer.
Geary, D. C. (2000). From infancy to adulthood: the development of numerical abilities. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 9, 11–16.
Gerlach, M., Fritz, A., & Leutner, D. (2013). MARKO-T. Mathematik- und Rechenkonzepte im Vorschul- und Grundschulalter Training [Mathematics and arithmetic training for developing concepts in preschool and early primary-school age]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Gersten, R., Clarke, B., Jordan, N. C., Newman-Gonchar, R., Haymond, K., & Wilkins, C. (2012). Universal screening in mathematics for the primary grades: beginnings of a research base. Exceptional Children, 78, 423–445.
Ginsburg, H. P., & Baroody, A. J. (2003). The test of early mathematics ability (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Goo, M., Watt, S., Park, Y., & Hosp, J. (2012). A guide to choosing web-based curriculum-based measurements for the classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45, 34–40.
Grégoire, J., Noël, M., & Nieuwenhoven, v. (2004). Tedi-Math (Flemish adaptation). Antwerpen, Belgium: TEMA: Brussels/Harcourt.
Henning, E., Ehlert, A., Ragpot, L., Herholdt, R., Balzer, L., & Fritz, A. (in press). MARKO-D-South-Africa: assessment of math concepts in first graders. Johannesburg, South Africa: University of Johannesburg.
Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2016). Handbook of response to intervention: the science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support. Springer Science & Business Media.
Jordan, N. C., & Glutting, J. (2012). Number sense screener (K-1): research edition. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Kaufmann, L., Nuerk, H.-C., Graf, M., Krinzinger, H., Delazer, M., & Willmes, K. (2008). Test zur Erfassung numerisch-rechnerischer Fertigkeiten vom Kindergarten bis zur 3. Klasse (Tedi-Math) [Test for the assessment of numerical and calculation skills from kindergarten age to third grade (Tedi-Math)]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
Koumoula, A., Tsironi, V., Stamouli, V., Bardani, I., Siapati, S., Graham, A., et al. (2004). An epidemiological study of number processing and mental calculation in Greek schoolchildren. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 377–388.
Krajewski, K. (2008). Prävention der Rechenschwäche [The early prevention of math problems]. In W. Schneider & M. Hasselhorn (Eds.), Handbuch der Pädagogischen Psychologie (pp. 360–370). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Krajewski, K., Küspert, P., Schneider, W., & Visé, M. (2002). Deutscher Mathematiktest für erste Klassen (DEMAT 1+) [German mathematics tests for first grade]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Krajewski, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). Early development of quantity to number-word linkage as a precursor of mathematical school achievement and mathematical difficulties: findings from a four-year longitudinal study. Learning and Instruction, 19, 513–526.
Montague, M., Penfield, R. D., Enders, C., & Huang, J. (2010). Curriculum-based measurement of math problem solving: a methodology and rationale for establishing equivalence of scores. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 39–52.
Renaissance Learning. (2012). STAR-math (enterprise). Wisconsin Rapids: Renaissance Learning. http://www.renaissance.com/products/star-assessments
Resnick, L. B. (1983). A developmental theory of number understanding. In H. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 109–151). New York: Academic.
Ricken, G., Fritz, A., & Balzer, L. (2013). MARKO-D—Mathematik- und Rechnen- Test zur Erfassung von Konzepten im Vorschulalter [MARKO-D—mathematics and arithmetic test for assessing concepts at preschool age]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Santos, F. H., Da Silva, P. A., Ribeiro, F. S., Dias, A. L. R. P., Frigério, M. C., Dellatolas, G., et al. (2012). Number processing and calculation in Brazilian children aged 7–12 years. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 513–525.
Spelke, E., Lee, S. A., & Izard, V. (2010). Beyond core knowledge: natural geometry. Cognitive Science, 34, 863–884.
Schrank, F. A., McGrew, K. S., & Mather N. (2015). Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Early Cognitive and Academic Development. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
Uwezo. (2014). http://www.uwezo.net/
van Luit, J. E. H., Van de Rijt, B. A. M., & Aunio, P. (2006). Early numeracy test, Finnish edition. Helsinki, Finland: Psykologien Kustannus.
van Luit, J. E. H., Van de Rijt, B. A. M., & Hasemann, K. (2001). OTZ Osnabrücker Test zur Zahlbegriffsentwicklung [German version of the Utrecht test of number sense]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
van Luit, J. E. H., van de Rijt, B. A. M., & Pennings, A. H. (1994). Utrechtse Getalbegrip Toets [Utrecht test of number sense]. Doetinchem, The Netherlands: Graviant.
van Nieuwenhoven, C., Grégoire, J., & Noël, M. P. (2001). Tedi-Math. In Test Diagnostique des Compétences de Base en Mathématiques [Tedi-Math: diagnostic test for basic competencies in mathematics]. Paris: Editions Centre de Psychologie Appliquée à Paris.
von Aster, M. G., Bzufka, M. W., & Horn, R. R. (2009). Neuropsychologische Testbatterie für Zahlenverarbeitung und Rechnen bei Kindern—Kindergartenversion—(ZAREKI-K) [Neuropsychological test battery for number processing and calculation in children—kindergarten version—(ZAREKI-K)]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Pearson.
von Aster, M., & Dellatolas, G. (2006). ZAREKI-R: batterie pour l’évaluation du traitement des nombres et du calcul chez l’enfant. Adaptation Francaise [ZAREKI-R: neuropsychological test battery for number processing and calculation in children. French adaptation]. Paris: ECPA.
von Aster, M. G., & Shalev, R. S. (2007). Number development and developmental dyscalculia. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49, 868–873.
von Aster, M. G., Weinhold Zulauf, M., & Horn, R. (2006). Neuropsychologische Testbatterie für Zahlenverarbeitung und Rechnen bei Kindern (ZAREKI-R) [Neuropsychological test battery for number processing and calculation in children (ZAREKI-R). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Pearson.
Wechsler, D. (2009). Wechsler individual achievement test (3rd edition). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
Wechsler, D. (2010). Wechsler individual achievement test—third edition: Canadian (WIAT-III CDN). Toronto, ON: Pearson.
Wechsler, D. (2016). Wechsler individual achievement test—Australian and New Zealand standardised, third edition (WIAT-III A&NZ). Sydney, Australia: Pearson.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lonnemann, J., Hasselhorn, M. (2019). Assessing Mathematical Competence and Performance: Quality Characteristics, Approaches, and Research Trends. In: Fritz, A., Haase, V.G., Räsänen, P. (eds) International Handbook of Mathematical Learning Difficulties. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97147-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97148-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)