Advertisement

Mathematical Learning and Its Difficulties in the United States: Current Issues in Screening and Intervention

  • Nancy C. JordanEmail author
  • Luke Rinne
  • Nicole Hansen
Chapter

Abstract

Over the course of the past decade, the field of mathematics learning disabilities (MLD) in the United States has evolved significantly. This chapter highlights key contributions that have affected screening and intervention in the United States in two crucial areas of mathematics education: core number competencies in the early grades and fractions in the intermediate grades. We discuss studies that identify powerful predictors of and influences on MLD for both of these areas and detail the long-term impact that failure to acquire knowledge in these areas may have on mathematical development. We also discuss validated screeners for detection of potential difficulties with whole numbers and fractions, respectively. Finally, we describe results from recent intervention studies indicating that these skills can be improved in many children with or at risk for MLD. The contributions represent findings that are influencing educational practice in the United States.

Keywords

Mathematics Mathematics learning difficulties and disabilities Number sense Fractions Screening and intervention 

References

  1. Alibali, M. W., Spencer, R. C., Knox, L., & Kita, S. (2011). Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1138–1114.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, D. H., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 447–445.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baroody, A. J. (1987). The development of counting strategies for single-digit addition. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(2), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baroody, A. J., Eiland, M., & Thompson, B. (2009). Fostering at-risk preschoolers' number sense. Early Education and Development, 20, 80–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baroody, A. J., Lai, M.-L., & Mix, K. S. (2006). The development of young children's early number and operation sense and its implications for early childhood education. In B. Spodek & O. Saracho (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of young children (pp. 187–221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Berch, D. B., & Mazzocco, M. M. (2007). Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  7. Bottge, B. A., Ma, X., Gassaway, L., Toland, M., Butler, M., & Cho, S. J. (2014). Effects of blended instructional models on math performance. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Romberg, T. A. (Eds.). (2012). Rational numbers: An integration of research. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Case, R., & Griffin, S. (1990). Child cognitive development: The role of central conceptual structures in the development of scientific and social thoughts. In C. A. Hauert (Ed.), Advances in psychology-developmental psychology: Cognitive, perception-motor, and neurological perspectives. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  10. Case, R., & Okamoto, Y. (1996). The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(1–2, Serial No. 246), i.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarke, B., Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., & Chard, D. (2008). An analysis of early numeracy curriculum-based measurement: Examining the role of growth in student outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 29(1), 46–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke, B., Doabler, C., Smolkowski, K., Kurtz Nelson, E., Fien, H., Baker, S. K., et al. (2016). Testing the immediate and long-term efficacy of a Tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(4), 607–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 136–163.Google Scholar
  14. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2008). Experimental evaluation of the effects of a research-based preschool mathematics curriculum. American Education Research Journal, 45(2), 443–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Council of Chief State School Officers & National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Common Core State Standards Initiative. http://www.corestandards.org/Math/. Accessed 25 Jan 2017.
  16. Dobbs, J., Doctoroff, G. L., & Fisher, P. H. (2003). The “math is everywhere” preschool mathematics curriculum. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10(1), 20–22.Google Scholar
  17. Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dyson, N., Rodrigues, J., Barbieri, C, Rinne, L. & Jordan, N. C (in press). A Fraction Sense Intervention for Students with or at Risk for Mathematics Difficulties. Remedial and Special EducationGoogle Scholar
  19. Dyson, N. I., Jordan, N. C., & Glutting, J. (2011). A number sense intervention for kindergartners at risk for math difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(2), 166–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frye, D., Baroody, A., Burchinal, M., Carver, S. M., Jordan, N. C., & McDowell, J. (2013). Teaching math to young children: A practice guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  22. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principles of effective practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(2), 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuchs, L. S., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., Fletcher, J. M., Fuchs, D., et al. (2009). Remediating number combination and word problem deficits among students with mathematics difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 561–576.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Long, J., Namkung, J., Hamlett, C. L., Cirino, P. T., et al. (2013). Improving at-risk learners' understanding of fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 683–700.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Long, J., Namkung, J., Malone, A. S., Wang, A., et al. (2016). Effects of intervention to improve at-risk fourth graders’ understanding, calculations, and word problems with fractions. The Elementary School Journal, 116(4), 625–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fuhs, M. W., Hornburg, C. B., & McNeil, N. M. (2016). Specific early number skills mediate the association between inhibitory control and mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1217–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geary DC, Bailey DH, Hoard MK. (2009)Predicting mathematical achievement and mathematical learning disability with a simple screening tool: The Number Sets Test. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(3), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4–15.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194040370010201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Byrd-Craven, J., Nugent, L., & Numtee, C. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78(4), 1343–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child's understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., et al. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009–4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  32. Gersten, R., Clarke, B., Jordan, N. C., Newman-Gonchar, R., Haymond, K., & Wilkins, C. (2012). Universal screening in mathematics for students in the primary grades. Exceptional Children, 78, 423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gersten, R., & Jordan, N. (2016). Introduction to the special series on fraction learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1, 1–2.Google Scholar
  34. Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Griffin, S. (2002). The development of math competence in the preschool and early school years: Cognitive foundations and instructional strategies. In J. M. Roher (Ed.), Mathematical cognition. In series: Current perspectives on cognition, learning, and instruction (pp. 1–32). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Griffin, S. (2004). Building number sense with Number Worlds: A mathematics program for young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hansen, N., Jordan, N. C., Fernandez, E., Siegler, R. S., Fuchs, L. S., Gersten, R., et al. (2015). Predictors of fraction knowledge in sixth grade. Cognitive Development, 35, 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hansen, N., Jordan, N. C., & Rodrigues, J. (2017). Identifying persistent learning difficulties in fractions: A longitudinal study of student growth from third through sixth grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 50(c), 49–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huttenlocher, J., Jordan, N., & Levine, S. (1994). A mental model for early arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 12(3), 284–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jordan, N. C., & Dyson, N. (2016). In A. Henik (Ed.)., Continuous issues in numerical cognition: How many or how much? Catching math problems early: Findings from the number sense intervention project (pp. 60–79). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  41. Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., Dyson, N., Hassinger-Das, B., & Irwin, C. (2012). Building kindergartners’ number sense: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 647–660.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., & Ramineni, C. (2010). The importance of number sense to mathematics achievement in first and third grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 82–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan. D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2008). Development of number combination skill in the early school years: When do fingers help? Developmental Science, 11(5), 662–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Locuniak, M. N., & Ramineni, C. (2007). Predicting first-grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22(1), 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Olah, L., & Locuniak, M. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77, 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number sense and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45, 850–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jordan, N. C., & Levine, S. C. (2009). Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15, 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jordan, N. C., Resnick, I., Rodrigues, J., Hansen, N., & Dyson, N. (2016). The Delaware longitudinal study of fraction learning: Implications for helping children with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(6), 621–630.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002221941662033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jordan, N. C., Rodrigues, J., Hansen, N., Resnick, I., & Dyson, N. (2017). Fraction development in children: Importance of building numerical magnitude understanding. In D. C. Geary, K. M. Koepke, D. Berch, & R. Ochsendorf (Eds.), Mathematical cognition and learning (Vol. 3, pp. 126–137). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  50. Klein, A., Starkey, P., Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., & Iyer, R. (2008). Effects of a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention: A randomized experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Levine, S. C., Jordan, N., & Huttenlocher, J. (1992). Development of calculation abilities in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 53(1), 72–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lewis, M. R., & Hubbard, E. M. (2015). A neurocognitive model of fractions learning. Talk presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  53. Locuniak, M. N., & Jordan, N. C. (2008). Using kindergarten number sense to predict calculation fluency in second grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(5), 451–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Malofeeva, E., Day, J., Saco, X., Young, L., & Ciancio, D. (2004). Construction and evaluation of a number sense test with head start children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 648–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mazzocco, M. M., & Thompson, R. E. (2005). Kindergarten predictors of math learning disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(3), 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Milgram, J. (2005). The mathematics pre-service teachers need to know. Stanford, CA: Department of Mathematics, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  57. National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  58. Ni, Y., & Zhou, Y. D. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40, 27–52.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Results from PISA 2012: United States. https://www.oecd.org/unitedstates/PISA-2012-results-US.pdf. Accessed 27 Jul 2017.
  60. Reigosa-Crespo, V., Valdés-Sosa, M., Butterworth, B., Estévez, N., Rodríguez, M., Santos, E., et al. (2012). Basic numerical capacities and prevalence of developmental dyscalculia: The Havana Survey. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Resnick, I., Jordan, N. C., Hansen, N., Rajan, V., Rodrigues, J., Siegler, R. S., et al. (2016). Developmental growth trajectories in understanding of fraction magnitude from fourth through sixth grade. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 746–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rinne, L., Ye, A., & Jordan, N. C. (2017). Development of fraction comparison strategies: A latent transition analysis. Developmental Psychology, 53(4), 713–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Jordan, N. C. (2016). Synthesis of IES-funded research on mathematics: 2002–2013 (NCER 2016–2003). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. This report is available on the Institute website at http://ies.ed.gov/ Google Scholar
  64. Rittle-Johnson, B., Star, J. R., & Durkin, K. (2009). The importance of prior knowledge when comparing examples: Influences on conceptual and procedural knowledge of equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 836–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Robinson, C. S., Menchetti, B. M., & Torgesen, J. K. (2002). Toward a two-factor theory of one type of mathematics disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(2), 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rodrigues, J., Dyson, N., Hansen, N., & Jordan, N. C. (2017). Preparing for algebra by building fraction sense. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(2), 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rodrigues, J., Hansen, N., Resnick, I., Dyson, N., Ye, A., & Jordan, N. C. (2016, April). A practical and powerful screener of middle school mathematics difficulties. Paper presented at the meeting of National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  68. Rousselle, L., & Noël, M.-P. (2007). Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing. Cognition, 102(3), 361–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schneider, M., & Siegler, R. S. (2010). Representations of the magnitudes of fractions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36(5), 1227–1238.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Seethaler, P. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2010). The predictive utility of kindergarten screening for math difficulty. Exceptional Children, 77, 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., et al. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23, 691–697.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Siegler, R. S., Fuchs, L., Jordan, N. C., Gersten, R., & Ochsendorf, R. (2015). Center for improving understanding of fractions: A progress report. In S. J. Chinn (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook for mathematical difficulties and dyscalculia (pp. 292–303). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Siegler, R. S., & Lortie-Forgues, H. (2014). An integrative theory of numerical development. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 144–150.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Siegler, R. S., & Pyke, A. A. (2013). Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1994–2004.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62(4), 273–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Starkey, P., Klein, A., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 99–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vukovic, R. K., Fuchs, L. S., Geary, D. C., Jordan, N. C., Gersten, R., & Siegler, R. S. (2014). Sources of individual differences in children’s understanding of fractions. Child Development, 85(4), 1461–1476.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Woodward, J. (2004). Mathematics education in the United States: Past to present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wu, H. (1999, Fall). Basic skills versus conceptual understanding. In American educator (pp. 1–7). Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human Development and Quantitative MethodologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.Peter Sammartino School of EducationFairleigh Dickinson UniversityTeaneckUSA

Personalised recommendations