Advertisement

The Water-Energy-Food Nexus and Climate Perspective: Relevance and Implications for Policy-making and Governance

  • Mohamed BehnassiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The natural resources used for water, energy and food are under increasing pressure across the world. Growth in both population and incomes is increasing consumption globally, stretching towards the planet’s ecological boundaries. Climate change exacerbates the pressure on all three interdependent resources, intensify the risk of insecurity and the significance of interdependencies, and makes millions of people, predominantly in developing countries, more vulnerable. Hence, in addition to the need to address these resource systems simultaneously, understanding and managing the links among them is essential for formulating policies for more resilient and adaptable societies. In this perspective, the concept of the water-energy-food (WEF) nexus has become widely used to help understand the complexities of these interdependent systems and how they can be managed sustainably and equitably to meet growing demand. Furthermore, proponents of the WEF nexus as an approach to planning and resource management highlight the need to improve efficiencies in resource use to reduce environmental degradation and maximize the social and economic benefits of increasingly scarce natural resources. The approach has been also advocated to address conflicts or trade-offs among the water, energy and food sectors.

Keywords

Water-energy-food nexus Climate change Intersectoral coordination Policy coherence Governance 

References

  1. Allouche, J., Middleton, C., & Gyawali, D. (2015). Technical veil, hidden politics: Interrogating the power linkages behind the nexus. Water Alternatives, 8(1), 610–626.Google Scholar
  2. Azhoni, A., Holman, I., & Jude, S. (2017). Adapting water management to climate change: Institutional involvement, inter-institutional networks and barriers in India. Global Environmental Change, 44, 144–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byakika, S., Schreiner, B., & Sullivan, A. (n.d.). Incentives for integrated WEF nexus planning in Kenya: Activating knowledge and networks. Cape Town: Pegasys Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Cairns, R., & Krzywoszynska, A. (2016). Anatomy of a buzzword: The emergence of ‘the water-energy-food nexus’ in UK natural resource debates. Environmental Science & Policy, 64, 164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conway, D., Archer van Garderen, E., Deryng, D., Dorling, S., Krueger, T., Landman, W., et al. (2015). Climate and Southern Africa’s water-energy-food nexus. Nature Climate Change, 5, 837–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Gregorio, M., Nurrochmat, D. R., Paavola, J., Sari, I. M., Fatorelli, L., Pramova, E., et al. (2017). Climate policy integration in the land use sector: Mitigation, adaptation and sustainable development linkages. Environmental Science & Policy, 67, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. FAO. (2014). The water–energy–food nexus at FAO: Concept note. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. www.gwp.org/globalassets/global/toolbox/references/the-water-energy-food-nexus-at-fao--- concept-note-fao-2014.pdfGoogle Scholar
  8. Foran, T. (2015). Node and regime: Interdisciplinary analysis of water–energy–food nexus in the Mekong Region. Water Alternatives, 8(1), 655–674.Google Scholar
  9. Halstead M., Kober T. & van der Zwaan B. (2014). Understanding the Energy-Water Nexus, ECN-E--14-046. http://www.idaea.csic.es/sites/default/files/Understanding-the-energy-water-nexus.pdf
  10. Howarth, C., & Monasterolo, I. (2016). Understanding barriers to decision making in the UK energy-food-water nexus: The added value of interdisciplinary approaches. Environmental Science & Policy, 61, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Howells, M., Hermann, S., Welsch, M., Bazilian, M., Segerstrom, R., Alfstad, T., Gielen, D., Rogner, H., Fischer, G., Velthuizen, H., Wiberg, D., Young, C., Roehrl, R., Mueller, A., Steduto, P., & Ramma, I. (2013). Integrated analysis of climate change, land-use, energy and water strategies. Nature Climate Change, 3(7), 621–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2012). World Energy Outlook 2012.Google Scholar
  13. Koop, S. H. A., Koetsier, L., Doornhof, A., Reinstra, O., Van Leeuwen, C. J., Brouwer, S., et al. (2017). Assessing the governance capacity of cities to address challenges of water, waste, and climate change. Water Resources Management, 31, 3427–3443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kurian, M. (2017). The water-energy-food nexus trade-offs, thresholds and transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development. Environmental Science & Policy, 68, 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leck, H., Conway, D., Bradshaw, M., & Rees, J. (2015). Tracing the water–energy–food nexus: Description, theory and practice. Geography Compass, 9(8), 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pardoe, J., et al. (2017). Climate change and the water–energy–food nexus: Insights from policy and practice in Tanzania. Climate Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1386082.
  17. Rasul, G. (2016). Managing the food, water, and energy nexus for achieving the sustainable development goals in gb. South Asia. Environmental Development, 18, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rasul, G., & Sharma, B. (2016). The nexus approach to water-energy-food security: An option for adaptation to climate change. Climate Policy, 16(6), 682–702.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1029865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scott A. (2017). Making governance work for water–energy–food nexus approaches, Working paper, CDKN.Google Scholar
  20. Stockholm Environmental Institute (SEI). (2011). Understanding the nexus. Background paper for the Bonn2011 Nexus conference – The water, energy and food security nexus: Solutions for the green economy.Google Scholar
  21. Lele, U., Klousia-Marquis, M., & Goswami, S. (2013). Good governance for food, water and energy security. Aquatic Procedia, 1, 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. UNDESA. (2013). World population prospects. The 2012 revision. Volume I: Comprehensive tables. Retrieved online (May 2015): http://esa.un.org/wpp/Documentation/pdf/WPP2012_Volume-I_Comprehensive-Tables.pdf
  23. UNDESA. (2014) World urbanization prospectus. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA). Retrieved online (April, 2015) http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Highlights/WUP2014-Highlights.pdf
  24. UNEP. (2012) Global environmental outlook 5: Environment for the future we want. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. www.unep.org/geo/assessments/global-assessments/global-environment-outlook-5
  25. WEF. (2016). The global risk report 2016 (11th ed.). Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  26. Weitz, N., Strambo, C., Kemp-Benedict, E., & Nilsson, M. (2017). Closing the governance gaps in the water-energy-food nexus: Insights from integrative governance. Global Environmental Change, 45, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weitz, N., Huber-Lee, A., Nilsson, M., Davis, M., & Hoff, H. (2014). Interactions in the SDGs: A nexus perspective. London: Independent Research Forum.Google Scholar
  28. Weitz, N., Strambo, C., Kemp-Benedict, E. & Nilsson, M. (2016) Governance in the water–energy–food nexus: Insights from integrative environmental governance. Paper for the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference, Prague, 7–10 December 2016.Google Scholar
  29. White, D. D., Leah, J. J., Maciejewski, R., Aggarwal, R., & Mascaro, G. (2017). Stakeholder analysis for the food-energy-water nexus in phoenix, Arizona: Implications for nexus governance. Sustainability, 9, 2204.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wichelns, D. (2017). The water-energy-food nexus: Is the increasing attention warranted, for either a research or policy perspective? Environmental Science & Policy, 69, 113–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yumkella, K. K., & Yillia, P. T. (2015). Framing the water-energy nexus for the post-2015 development agenda. Aquatic Procedia, 5/8–5/512.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Laboratory for Territorial Governance, Human Security and Sustainability (LAGOS), Faculty of Law, Economics and Social SciencesIbn Zohr University of AgadirAgadirMorocco
  2. 2.Center for Research on Environment, Human Security and Governance (CERES)AgadirMorocco

Personalised recommendations