The Trump Effect: Debunking the False Narrative of “Post-Racial” America

  • Shukri HilowleEmail author
Part of the Critical Studies of Education book series (CSOE, volume 9)


This paper explores the racial dimensions of western military and political interventions and asks whether the sociology of race and ethnicity can provide the critical lens by which to understand conflict and the evolution of ethnic tensions in present day Afghanistan. Drawing on the sociology of race and ethnicity I argue that ethnic conflict in Afghanistan is not disconnected from western imperial projects in the region which frame the Pashtun people as the pre-modern and violent ‘bad Muslims’. I consider colonial texts related to British India and examine the role of colonial policies of aggression in framing Pashtuns as the cultural ‘Others’. I also draw attention to contemporary discourses about the post 9–11 invasion of Afghanistan and show the linkages between, racial discourses exported by western military and political interventions, and local articulations of Pashtun ethnic identity. I argue that local Afghan articulations of Pashtun ethnic as cultural ‘Others’ are not isolated from the broader contexts of colonial power and imperial legacies of domination. Rather, knowledge about the Pashtun identity is closely linked to racialized discourses exported by imperial interventions.


Post-racial Colour-blind racism Anti-black racism Populist movement Race relations All lives matter Black lives matter Social movements Protest New racism 

Work Cited

  1. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2015). The structure of racism in color-blind, “Post-Racial” America. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(11), 1358–1376 Web.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunson, R. K. (2005). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology, 46(4), 613–640 Web.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bump, P. (2016). Donald Trump is now doing worse with Hispanic voters than any Republican since 1996. (The Washington Post) Retrieved from Scholar
  4. Catanese, B. W. (2011). The problem of the color(blind): Racial transgression and the politics of black performance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dei, G. J. S. (1996). Theoretical approaches to the study of race. In G. J. S. Dei (Ed.), Anti-racism education in theory and practice. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Dei, G.J.S. (2016). Anti-colonial education. Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory : 1–6. Web.Google Scholar
  7. Fisher, P. I. (2016). Definitely not moralistic: State political culture and support for Donald Trump in the race for the 2016 republican presidential nomination. PS: Political Science & Politics, 49(04), 743–747 Web.Google Scholar
  8. Halstead, J. (2016). The real reason white people say ‘All Lives Matter’ (The Huffington Post). Retrieved from
  9. Heimbach, M. (2016). Alternative right. Southern Poverty Law Centre. N.p., 07 July 2013. Web. 26 Dec.Google Scholar
  10. Hooker, J. (2016). Black lives matter and the paradoxes of U.S. Black Politics: From democratic sacrifice to democratic repair. Political Theory, 44(4), 448–469 Web.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ivery, C. L., & Bassett, J. A. (2015). Reclaiming integration and the language of race in the “post-racial” era. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Print.Google Scholar
  12. Kimberlé Crenshaw. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist policies. The University of Chicago Legal Forum 140: 139–167.Google Scholar
  13. King, Martin Luther. Martin Luther King I have a dream. USA: MPI Release, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
  14. Kirk, A, & Scott P (2016). US election: How age, race and education are deciding factors in the race for President. The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group Limited, 07 Nov. 2016. Web. 20 Dec.Google Scholar
  15. Mayer, W. G. (2015). Why Trump – and how far can he go? The Forum, 13(4). n. pag. Web.Google Scholar
  16. Olson, J. (2008). Whiteness and the Polarization of American Politics. Political Research Quarterly, 61(4), 704–718 Web.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schuman, H., Steeh, C., & Bobo, L. (1985). Racial attitudes in America: trends and interpretations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Print.Google Scholar
  18. Shepardson, D. (2016). Obama: “My election did not create a post-racial society”. Business Insider. N.p., 07 May 2016. Web. 27 Dec.Google Scholar
  19. Sullivan, S., & Tuana, N. (2007). Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  20. Touré. (2011). Who’s afraid of post-blackness?: What it means to be Black now. New York: Free Press Print.Google Scholar
  21. White, J. K. (2016). Donald Trump and the scourge of populism. The Forum, 14(3). n. pag. Web.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OISEUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations