Advertisement

Pelvic Floor Anatomy as It Relates to the Design and Development of Vaginal Mesh Kits

  • Jonia Alshiek
  • S. Abbas Shobeiri
Chapter

Abstract

Pelvic floor architectural defects are related to parity, aging, hysterectomy, and chronic straining. The muscles and the supportive connective tissue can be torn, stretched, or denervated. Basic understanding of pelvic floor anatomy is essential to understanding why the use of vaginal mesh kits was seen as a plausible surgical solution. The goal of the current chapter is to use the suspension bridge analogy and simple representative drawings to communicate to readers the complex pelvic floor anatomy and function and the rationale behind mesh usage.

Keywords

Pelvic floor Levator ani muscle Perineal body Endopelvic fascia Pubocervical Rectovaginal Uterosacral Mesh Cystocele Rectocele 

References

  1. 1.
    NIH state-of-the science conference statement on prevention of fecal and urinary incontinence in adults. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2007;24(1):1–37.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA. 2008;300(11):1311–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):501–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(1):108–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(5):1096–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aigmueller T, Dungl A, Hinterholzer S, Geiss I, Riss P. An estimation of the frequency of surgery for posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(3):299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quiroz LH, Munoz A, Shippey SH, Gutman RE, Handa VL. Vaginal parity and pelvic organ prolapse. J Reprod Med. 2010;55(3–4):93–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boreham MK, Wai CY, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA. Morphometric analysis of smooth muscle in the anterior vaginal wall of women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morgan DM, Rogers MA, Huebner M, Wei JT, Delancey JO. Heterogeneity in anatomic outcome of sacrospinous ligament fixation for prolapse: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(6):1424–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jakus SM, Shapiro A, Hall CD. Biologic and synthetic graft use in pelvic surgery: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008;63(4):253–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Verdaasdonk EG, Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004;240(4):578–83. discussion 583-5PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, Ijzermans JN, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(6):392–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ricci JV, Thom CH. The myth of a surgically useful fascia in vaginal plastic reconstructions. Q Rev Surg Obstet Gynecol. 1954;11(4):253–61.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gitsch E, Palmrich AH. Operative anatomie. Berlin: De Gruyter; 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Albright T, Gehrich A, Davis G, Sabi F, Buller J. Arcus tendineus fascia pelvis: a further understanding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3):677–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(6 Pt 1):1717–24. discussion 1724-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shobeiri SA, Leclaire E, Nihira MA, Quiroz LH, O’Donoghue D. Appearance of the levator ani muscle subdivisions in endovaginal three-dimensional ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Campbell RM. The anatomy and histology of the sacrouterine ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1950;59(1):1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Range RL, Woodburne RT. The gross and microscopic anatomy of the transverse cervical ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1964;90:460–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Richardson AC, Edmonds PB, Williams NL. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence due to paravaginal fascial defect. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57(3):357–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    DeLancey J. Fascial and muscular abnormalities in women with urethral hypermobility and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):93–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chesson RR, Schlossberg SM, Elkins TE, Menefee S, McCammon K, Franco N, et al. The use of fascia lata graft for correction of severe or recurrent anterior vaginal wall defects. J Pelvic Surg. 1999;5(2):96–103.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oelrich T. The striated urogenital sphincter muscle in the female. Anat Rec. 1983;205(2):223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dwyer PL, O’Reilly BA. Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;111(8):831–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shobeiri SA, Chesson RR, Gasser RF. The internal innervation and morphology of the human female levator ani muscle. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(6):686.e1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lawson JO. Pelvic anatomy. I. Pelvic floor muscles. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1974;54(5):244–52.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kearney R, Sawhney R, DeLancey JOL. Levator ani muscle anatomy evaluated by origin-insertion pairs. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(1):168–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Taverner D, Smiddy FG. An electromyographic study of the normal function of the external anal sphincter and pelvic diaphragm. Dis Colon Rectum. 1959;2(2):153–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nichols DH, Milley PS, Randall CL. Significance of restoration of normal vaginal depth and axis. Obstet Gynecol. 1970;36(2):251–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boreham MK, Wai CY, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA. Morphometric properties of the posterior vaginal wall in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1501–8; discussion 1508–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Takac P, Gualtieri M, Nassiri M, Candiotti K, Medina CA. Vaginal smooth muscle cell apoptosis is increased in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(11):1559–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Guaderrama NM, Liu J, Nager CW, Pretorius DH, Sheean G, Kassab G, et al. Evidence for the innervation of pelvic floor muscles by the pudendal nerve. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(4):774–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyGynecologic Subspecialties, Inova Women’s Hospital, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityFalls ChurchUSA
  2. 2.Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  3. 3.INOVA Health SystemFalls ChurchUSA

Personalised recommendations