Advertisement

Conclusion: Labor Migration After All?

  • Miloslav Bahna
  • Martina Sekulová
Chapter

Abstract

A summary of the two main insights of the presented approach to the topic of circular migration of care workers from Central and Eastern Europe to Austria concludes the book. Seeing care workers as labor migrants can explain the dynamics of live-in care provision in Austria, while insights from dual labor market theory explain particular features of live-in care work. After abandoning the care drain perspective, it is migration that turns employment in a demanding and low-paid job into an experience of job satisfaction and life success. Future of cross-border care provision within Europe is being discussed in a situation of diminishing income differences, suggesting it is only a matter of time when migrant care provision will predominantly come from outside the EU.

References

  1. Apitzsch, U. (2009). Care, Migration and the Gender Order. In Seminar Proceedings, International Migration, Ethnicity and Gender: Intersectional Perspectives on Labour, Power and Citizenship, February 2010. Norrköping: REMESO – Institute for Research on Migration, Ethnicity and Society, at Linköping University.Google Scholar
  2. Barbiano di Belgiojoso, E., & Ortensi, L. E. (2018). Satisfied After All? Working Trajectories and Job Satisfaction of Foreign-Born Female Domestic and Care Workers in Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1465401
  3. Bauer, G., & Österle, A. (2016). Mid and Later Life Care Work Migration: Patterns of Re-Organising Informal Care Obligations in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Aging Studies, 37, 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2016.02.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chau, H. S., Pelzelmayer, K., & Schwiter, K. (2016). Short-Term Circular Migration and Gendered Negotiation of the Right to the City: The Case of Migrant Live-In Care Workers in Basel, Switzerland. Cities, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doeringer, P. B., & Piore, M. J. (1971). Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. New York: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  6. Hochschild, A. R. (2000). Global Care Chains and Emotional Surplus Value. In T. Giddens & W. Hutton (Eds.), On the Edge: Globalization and the New Millennium (pp. 130–146). London: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Iecovich, E. (2011). What Makes Migrant Live-In Home Care Workers in Elder Care Be Satisfied with Their Job? The Gerontologist, 51(5), 617–629. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kniejska, P. (2016). Migrant Care Workers aus Polen in der häuslichen Pflege: Zwischen familiärer Nähe und beruflicher Distanz. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lutz, H. (2010). Gender in the Migratory Process. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1647–1663. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2010.489373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pessar, P. R., & Mahler, S. J. (2003). Transnational Migration: Bringing Gender In. International Migration Review, 37(3), 812–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2003.tb00159.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Piperno, F. (2012). The Impact of Female Emigration on Families and the Welfare State in Countries of Origin: The Case of Romania. International Migration, 50(5), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00668.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miloslav Bahna
    • 1
  • Martina Sekulová
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for SociologySlovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Independent ResearcherBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations