Advertisement

Evolution and Challenges in Frontal Sinus Surgery

  • Carol H. Yan
  • David W. Kennedy
Chapter

Abstract

Diseases of the frontal sinus have long challenged otorhinolaryngologists who debated over the optimal surgical approach. Historical techniques in frontal sinus surgery focused on obliteration of disease through predominantly external approaches. Unfortunately, these procedures were disfiguring and wrought with high failure rates and frequent revisions. The advent of endoscopic techniques and innovative instrumentation have advanced our understanding of frontal sinus anatomy and improved surgical outcomes. The modern approach to frontal sinus disease involves mucosal-sparing techniques and a restoration of a nasofrontal outflow tract. This chapter highlights the spectrum and evolution of frontal sinus surgery and the technological advances that have changed our management of frontal sinus disease.

Keywords

Osteoplastic flap Trephination Ablation Endoscopic Lothrop Mucosal sparing Stents Balloon dilatation 

References

  1. 1.
    Ramadan HH. History of frontal sinus surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(1):98–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Donald P. Surgical management of frontal sinus infections. In: The Sinuses. New York: Raven Press; 1995. p. 201–32.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wells S. Abscess of the frontal sinus. Lancet. 1870;1:694–5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McLaughlin RB. History of surgical approaches to the frontal sinus. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2001;34(1):49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coakley C. Frontal sinusitis: diagnosis, treatment, and results. Trans Am Laryngol Rhinol Otol Soc. 1905;11:101.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skillern RH. The catarrhal and suppurative diseases of the accessory sinuses of the nose, vol. 1. Philadelphia and London: J. B. Lippincott Co.; 1913. p. 389.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lothrop HA. XIV. Frontal sinus suppuration: the establishment of permanent nasal drainage; the closure of external fistulae; epidermization of sinus. Ann Surg. 1914;59(6):937–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gross WE, Gross CW, Becker D, Moore D, Phillips D. Modified transnasal endoscopic Lothrop procedure as an alternative to frontal sinus obliteration. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;113(4):427–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Draf W. Endonasal micro-endoscopic frontal sinus surgery: the fulda concept. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;2(4):234–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murr AH, Dedo HH. Frontoethmoidectomy with Sewall-Boyden reconstruction: indications, technique, and philosophy. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2001;34(1):153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neel HB, McDonald TJ, Facer GW. Modified Lynch procedure for chronic frontal sinus diseases: rationale, technique, and long-term results. Laryngoscope. 1987;97(11):1274–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Friedman WH. External approaches to the frontal sinuses. In: Diseases of the sinuses: diagnosis and management. 1st ed. PMPH–USA. p. 391–403.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dawes JD. The management of frontal sinusitis and its complications. J Laryngol Otol. 1961;75:297–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Messerklinger W. On the drainage of the normal frontal sinus of man. Acta Otolaryngol. 1967;63(2):176–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kennedy DW, Zinreich SJ, Rosenbaum AE, Johns ME. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Theory and diagnostic evaluation. Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111(9):576–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zinreich SJ, Kennedy DW, Rosenbaum AE, Gayler BW, Kumar AJ, Stammberger H. Paranasal sinuses: CT imaging requirements for endoscopic surgery. Radiology. 1987;163(3):769–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kennedy DW, Josephson JS, Zinreich SJ, Mattox DE, Goldsmith MM. Endoscopic sinus surgery for mucoceles: a viable alternative. Laryngoscope. 1989;99(9):885–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stammberger H. Nasal and paranasal sinus endoscopy. A diagnostic and surgical approach to recurrent sinusitis. Endoscopy. 1986;18(6):213–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schaefer SD, Close LG. Endoscopic management of frontal sinus disease. Laryngoscope. 1990;100(2 Pt 1):155–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alyea OEV. Frontal cells: an anatomic study of these cells with consideration of their clinical significance. Arch Otolaryngol. 1941;34(1):11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuhn FA, Bolger WE, Tisdal RG. The agger nasi cell in frontal recess obstruction: an anatomic, radiologic and clinical correlation. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;2(4):226–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Draf W. Endonasal frontal sinus drainage type I–III according to Draf. In: Kountakis SE, Senior BA, Draf W, editors. The frontal sinus [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. p. 337–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48523-1_25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Close LG, Lee NK, Leach JL, Manning SC. Endoscopic resection of the intranasal frontal sinus floor. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1994;103(12):952–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Georgalas C, Hansen F, Videler WJM, Fokkens WJ. Long terms results of Draf type III (modified endoscopic Lothrop) frontal sinus drainage procedure in 122 patients: a single centre experience. Rhinology. 2011;49(2):195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anderson P, Sindwani R. Safety and efficacy of the endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(9):1828–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jacobs JB. 100 years of frontal sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 1997;107(11 Pt 2):1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Walsh TE. Experimental surgery of the frontal sinus The role of the ostium and nasofrontal duct in postoperative healing. Laryngoscope. 1943;53(2):75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schenck NL. Frontal sinus disease: III. Experimental and clinical factors in failure of the frontal osteoplastic operation. Laryngoscope. 1975;85(1):76–92.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Friedman WH, Katsantonis GP. Intranasal and transantral ethmoidectomy: a 20-year experience. Laryngoscope. 1990;100(4):343–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wigand ME, Hosemann WG. Endoscopic surgery for frontal sinusitis and its complications. Am J Rhinol. 1991;5(3):85–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Weber R, Draf W, Kratzsch B, Hosemann W, Schaefer SD. Modern concepts of frontal sinus surgery. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(1):137–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Neel HB, Whicker JH, Lake CF. Thin rubber sheeting in frontal sinus surgery: animal and clinical studies. Laryngoscope. 1976;86(4):524–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Murr AH, Smith TL, Hwang PH, Bhattacharyya N, Lanier BJ, Stambaugh JW, et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel bioabsorbable, steroid-eluting sinus stent. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011;1(1):23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Brown CL, Bolger WE. Safety and feasibility of balloon catheter dilation of paranasal sinus ostia: a preliminary investigation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006;115(4):293–9. discussion 300-301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bolger WE, Brown CL, Church CA, Goldberg AN, Karanfilov B, Kuhn FA, et al. Safety and outcomes of balloon catheter sinusotomy: a multicenter 24-week analysis in 115 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(1):10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Luong A, Batra PS, Fakhri S, Citardi MJ. Balloon catheter dilatation for frontal sinus ostium stenosis in the office setting. Am J Rhinol. 2008;22(6):621–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sillers MJ, Lay KF. Balloon catheter dilation of the frontal sinus ostium. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2016;49(4):965–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hahn S, Palmer JN, Purkey MT, Kennedy DW, Chiu AG. Indications for external frontal sinus procedures for inflammatory sinus disease. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(3):342–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Batra PS, Citardi MJ, Lanza DC. Combined endoscopic trephination and endoscopic frontal sinusotomy for management of complex frontal sinus pathology. Am J Rhinol. 2005;19(5):435–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Patel AB, Cain RB, Lal D. Contemporary applications of frontal sinus trephination: A systematic review of the literature. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(9):2046–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Seiberling K, Jardeleza C, Wormald P-J. Minitrephination of the frontal sinus: indications and uses in today’s era of sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;23(2):229–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Piltcher OB, Antunes M, Monteiro F, Schweiger C, Schatkin B. Is there a reason for performing frontal sinus trephination at 1 cm from midline? A tomographic study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;72(4):505–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hardy JM, Montgomery WW. Osteoplastic frontal sinusotomy: an analysis of 250 operations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1976;85(4 Pt 1):523–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Illing EA, Cho DY, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Draf III mucosal graft technique: long-term results. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016;6(5):514–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Conger BT, Riley K, Woodworth BA. The Draf III mucosal grafting technique: a prospective study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(4):664–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Abuzeid WM, Mace JC, Costa ML, Rudmik L, Soler ZM, Kim GS, et al. Outcomes of chronic frontal sinusitis treated with ethmoidectomy: a prospective study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016;6(6):597–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hilding A. Experimental surgery of the nose and sinuses: II. Gross results following the removal of the intersinus septum and of strips of mucous membrane from the frontal sinus of the dog. Arch Otolaryngol. 1933;17(3):321–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol H. Yan
    • 1
  • David W. Kennedy
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations