Advertisement

Boredom and Classroom Design: The Affective Economies of School Engagement

  • Noah W. Sobe
Chapter
Part of the Educational Governance Research book series (EGTU, volume 9)

Abstract

Educators have long been rightly concerned about the risk that schools themselves can produce profoundly unsettling and potentially ‘unproductive’ emotional and physical states among children and youth. This chapter examines two moments in the attentive regimes and engagement paradigms that have been manifest in the material design of schools and classrooms in the United States in the twentieth century. The first part looks at a temporary classroom constructed as part of a demonstration of Montessori pedagogy at the 1915 World’s Fair in San Francisco, California. The second section examines the classrooms the Crow Island School built in 1940 in Winnetka, Illinois, a wealthy Chicago suburb renowned for its progressive schools. In both these instances, architects and educators linked design with affect and connected design to strategies for managing boredom. Drawing on scholarship from architectural history and the history of emotions, I treat the ascription of affective effect to school design and architecture as itself a shifting historical artifact worthy of examination. The chapter argues that the confluence of emotional modulation, classroom design, and engagement/boredom management forms an important site in the governing of individuals.

Keywords

Affect Boredom Engagement Architecture Marietta Johnson Progressive education Photographs 

References

  1. Benjamin, W. (1968). The work of art in an age of mechanical reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.), Iluminations: Essays and reflections (pp. 217–252). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich original German publication 1935.Google Scholar
  2. Burke, C. (2016). A life in education and architecture: Mary Beaumont Medd. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burke, C., & Grosvenor, I. (2008). School. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  4. Crow Island Revisited. (1955, October). Architectural Forum, 103(4).Google Scholar
  5. Eggener, K. L. (1994). Maybeck’s Melancholy: Architecture, empathy, empire, and mental illness at the 1915 Panama-Pacific international exposition. Winterthur Portfolio, 29(4), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gutek, G. L., & Gutek, P. A. (2016). Bringing montessori to America: S.S. McClure, Maria Montessori and the campaign to publicize montessori education. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hinkle, F. R. (1915, September 11). A day with Dr. Maria Montessori and her youthful charges is an eyeopener for the average parent. San Francisco Chronicle.Google Scholar
  8. Kozlovsky, R. (2015). Architecture, emotions and the history of childhood. In S. Olsen (Ed.), Childhood, youth, and emotions in modern history (pp. 95–118). New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kramer, R. (1976). Maria Montessori: A biography. New York: Diversion Books.Google Scholar
  10. Kurtze, P. (1995). A school house well arranged: Baltimore public school buildings on the Lancasterian plan 1829–1839. Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture, 5, 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maybeck, B. (1915). Palace of fine arts and lagoon. San Francisco: Paul Elder.Google Scholar
  12. Montessori, M. (1912). Montessori method (A. E. George, Trans.). New York: Frederick Stokes Company.Google Scholar
  13. Montessori, M. (1915). My system of education. Journal and Proceedings and Addresses of the National Education Association, 53, 65.Google Scholar
  14. Neuhaus, E. (1915). The art of the exposition, personal impressions of the architecture, sculpture, mural decorations, color scheme and other aesthetic aspects of the Panama-Pacific international exposition. San Francisco: Paul Elder & Co.Google Scholar
  15. Ogata, A. F. (2013). Designing the creative child: Playthings and places in Midcentury America (pp. 108–116). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Presler, F. (1941, August). A letter to the architects, Crow Island School, Winnetka Ill. Architectural Forum, 75, 80–81.Google Scholar
  17. Rasmussen, K. (2004). Places for children – Children’s places. Childhood, 11(2), 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Ryan, W. C. (1916). Education exhibits at the Panama-Pacific international exposition. Bureau of Education Bulletin, 1, 99.Google Scholar
  20. Sobe, N. W. (2004). Challenging the gaze: The subject of attention and a 1915 montessori demonstration classroom. Educational Theory, 54(3), 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sobe, N. W. (2007). Attention and spectatorship: Educational exhibits at the Panama-Pacific international exposition, San Francisco 1915. In V. Barth (Ed.), Innovation and education at international expositions (pp. 95–116). Paris: International Bureau of Expositions/BIE.Google Scholar
  22. Sobe, N. W. (2012). Researching emotion and affect in the history of education. History of Education, 41(5), 689–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sobe, N. W. (2015). Attention and Boredom in the 19th-Century American School: The ‘Drudgery’ of learning and teaching and the common school reform movement. In S. Reh, K. Berdelmann, & J. Dinkelaker (Eds.), Aufmerksamkeit Zur Geschichte, Theorie und Empirie eines pädagogischen Phänomens (pp. 55–70). Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Todd, F. M. (1921). The story of the exposition: Being the official history of the international celebration held at San Francisco in 1915 to commemorate the discovery of the Pacific Ocean and the construction of the Panama Canal. San Francisco: Panama-Pacific International Exposition Company.Google Scholar
  25. Washburne, C. W. (1942). Crow Island school – In Winnetka. American School and University, 14, 66.Google Scholar
  26. Washburne, C. W. (1963). Winnetka: The history and significance of an educational experiment. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  27. Weisser, A. S. (1995). The excellent discussion of the planning and building of the school. In Institutional revisions: Modernism and American public schools from the depression through the Second World War (pp. 74–84). PhD Dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
  28. White, S. F. (1991). Progressive renaissance: America and the reconstruction of Italian education, 1943–1962. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  29. Why all California Wears a Broad Smile. (1915, April). Sunset: The Pacific Monthly, 34(3), 636.Google Scholar
  30. Wilder, L. I., & Wilder, A. (1974). West from home: Letters of Laura Ingalls Wilder to Almanzo Wilder, San Francisco, 1915. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  31. Zilversmit, A. (1993). Changing schools: Progressive education theory and practice, 1930–1960. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Noah W. Sobe
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationLoyola UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations