Advertisement

Looking Ahead

  • Sara F. Oldfield
  • Peggy Olwell
  • Nancy Shaw
  • Kayri Havens
Chapter
Part of the Springer Earth System Sciences book series (SPRINGEREARTH)

Abstract

Plant diversity is essential for our future. Existing actions show that plant diversity in the U.S. can be effectively conserved and restored. However, initiatives need to be expanded at a time of unprecedented environmental change with implications for national and global economic development and security. There are major challenges in managing native plant diversity, including “plant blindness” that results in a lack of public and political interest. Botanical capacity in the workforce, educational institutions, and general public is declining at the same time as it is necessary to study and conserve native plant communities and understand the shifting baselines arising from climate change. In this chapter the challenges are addressed, progress in restoring plant-rich habitats and the economic benefits this brings are discussed, and the fundamental need for wise use of native seed is emphasized.

Keywords

UN Sustainable Development Goals National Seed Strategy Plant blindness Botanic gardens Citizen science Urban landscaping 

References

  1. Bagley K (2014) Infographic: a field guide to the U.S. environmental movement. Inside climate news, Brooklyn, NYGoogle Scholar
  2. Balding M, Williams KJH (2016) Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation. Conserv Biol 30(6):1192–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baughman OW et al (2019) Strong patterns of intraspecific variation and local adaptation in Great Basin plants revealed through a review of 75 years of experiments. Ecol Evol.  https://doi.org/10.1002/3c33.5200
  4. BenDor T, Lester TW, Livengood A, Davis A, Yonavjak L (2015) Estimating the size and impact of the ecological restoration economy. PLoS One 10(6):e0128339.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128339. Accessed 30 Oct 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett G, Carroll N, Sever K, Neale A, Hartley C (2016) An atlas of ecosystem markets in the United States. Forest Trends, Washington, DC, 19 pGoogle Scholar
  6. Broadhurst LM, Lowe A, Coates DJ, Cunningham SA, McDonald M, Vesk PA, Yates C (2008) Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximizing evolutionary potential. Evol Appl 1(4):587–597PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Brook BW, Ellis EC, Perring MP, Mackay AW, Blomqvist L (2012) Does the terrestrial biosphere have planetary tipping points? TREE 1664:1–6Google Scholar
  8. Brooklyn Botanic Garden (2019) Brooklyn botanic garden. https://www.bbg.org/. Accessed 11 June 2019
  9. Brzuszek RF, Harkess RL (2009) Green industry survey of native plant marketing in the southeastern United States. HortTechnology 19(1):168–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chicago Botanic Garden (CBG) (2019) Budburst. http://wwwbudburstorg/. Accessed 13 June 2019
  11. Diaz S et al (2019) Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. IPBES, Paris. 39 pGoogle Scholar
  12. Ellis EC (2011) Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Phil Trans R Soc A 369:1010–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellis EC, Kaplan JO, Fuller DQ, Vavrus S, Goldewijk KK, Verburg PH (2013) Used planet: a global history. PNAS 110(20):7978–7985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellwood ER, Crimmins TM, Miller-Rushing AJ (2017) Citizen science and conservation: recommendations for a rapidly moving field. Biol Conserv 208:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haefele M, Loomis J, Bilmes LJ (2016) Total economic valuation of the National Park Service lands and programs: results of a survey of the American public. George Wright Forum 33(3):335–345 http://webdoc.agsci.colostate.edu/DARE/PubLinks/NPSTotalEconValue.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
  16. Havens K (2017) The role of botanic gardens and arboreta in restoring plants: from populations to ecosystems. Chapter 6. In: Blackmore S, Oldfield SF (eds) Plant conservation science and practice. The role of botanic gardens. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Havens K, Kramer AT, Guerrant EO (2014) Getting plant conservation right (or not): the case of the United States. Int J Plant Sci 175(1):3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hereford J (2009) A quantitative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs. Am Nat 173(5):579–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Institute for Applied Ecology (IAE) (2019) Institute for Applied Ecology Sagebrush in Prisons Project. https://appliedeco.org/programs/sagebrush/. Accessed 20 June 2019
  20. Kramer A, Havens K (2009) Plant conservation genetics in a changing world. Trends Plant Sci 14(11):599–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kramer AT, Zorn-Arnold B, Havens K (2013) Applying lessons from the US botanical capacity assessment project to achieve 2020 global strategy for plant conservation targets. Ann Mo Bot Gard 99(2):172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leimu R, Fischer M (2008) A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS One 3:e4010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCormick SJ, Tijian R (2010) A new focus on plant sciences. Science 330:1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mooney HA (2010) The ecosystem-service chain and the biological diversity crisis. Philos Trans R Soc B 365(1537):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Obama BH (2015) Remarks by the President on sustainable development goals. The White House, Washington, DC. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/09/27/remarks-president-sustainabledevelopment-goals. Accessed 13 June 2019Google Scholar
  26. Peters CB, Zhan Y, Schwartz MW, Godoy L, Ballard HL (2017) Trusting land to volunteers: how and why land trusts involve volunteers in ecological monitoring. Biol Conserv 208:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rainer T, West C (2016) Planting in a post-wild world. Designing plant communities for resilient landscapes. Timber Press. Portland, OR, 272 pGoogle Scholar
  28. Salles JM (2011) Valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services: Why linking economic values with nature? DR 2011-24 Laboratoire Montpelliérain d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  29. Sgro` CM, Lowe AJ, Hoffmann AA (2011) Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change. Evol Appl 4(2):326–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaw S, Schwarz-Ballard J (2017) Cultivating the power of plants to sustain and enrich life: how public gardens can realise our purpose by focusing on the basic human needs universal to diverse audiences. Chapter 8 in: Blackmore S, Oldfield SF (eds) (2017) Plant conservation science and practice. The role of botanic gardens. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  31. United Nations (UN) (2019) Sustainable development goals knowledge platform. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300. Accessed 13 June 2019
  32. Wandersee J H, Schussler EE 1998. A model of plant blindness. Poster and paper presented at the 3rd Annual Associates Meeting of the 15° Laboratory, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LAGoogle Scholar
  33. World Economic Forum (2017) The global risks report 2017, 12th edition. http://wef.ch/risks2017. Accessed 17 Mar 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara F. Oldfield
    • 1
  • Peggy Olwell
    • 2
  • Nancy Shaw
    • 3
  • Kayri Havens
    • 4
  1. 1.CambridgeUK
  2. 2.Bureau of Land ManagementWashington, DCUSA
  3. 3.USDA Forest ServiceRocky Mountain Research StationBoiseUSA
  4. 4.Chicago Botanic GardenGlencoeUSA

Personalised recommendations