Managerial Support in R&D Operations and Practices for Realizing Technological developments

  • Sudeshna RoyEmail author
  • Nipu Modak
  • Pranab K. Dan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)


New product development (NPD) has become inevitable constituent of the various scales of industries for industrial sustainability. Global market introduces an enormous scope for exploring new products and expanding product families for developing competitive advantage. This approach not only brings innovativeness to the companies but also accompanied by challenging environment for success and survival. Support from top managers motivates research and development (R&D) operations and practices in the company which helps to develop new and innovative products by proper utilization of available resources. This empirical study identifies the influential role of top management to control the R&D activities in optimal way to develop new products with technological advancement. The primary data have been collected from 76 Indian manufacturing companies to depict the role of top management support to expand R&D operations and practices for technological developments which in turn accelerate NPD success. Structural equation modeling (SEM) approach has been used to develop the structural model using IBM SPSS AMOS 21.0 software package.


New product development Top management support Research and development Technological development Structural equation modeling 



The research work was substantially supported by a grant from the Department of Science and Technology (DST) of Government of India as a DST INSPIRE Fellowship to carry out the doctoral research of the corresponding author. The authors are also thankful to the industry personnel and experts from manufacturing industries from India who shared their views and opinions.


  1. 1.
    Tzokas, N., Hultink, E.J., Hart, S.: Navigating the new product development process. Ind. Mark. Manage. 33, 619–626 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lau, A.K.W.: Critical success factors in managing modular production design: six company case studies in Hong Kong, China, and Singapore. J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 28, 168–183 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buyukozkan, G., Arsenyan, J.: Collaborative product development: a literature overview. Prod. Plann. Control 23, 47–66 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sarja, J.: Explanatory definitions of the technology push success factors. J. Technol. Manage. Innov. 10(1), 204–214 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ernst, H.: Success factors of new product development: a review of the empirical literature. Int. J. Manage. Rev. 4, 1–40 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhuiyan, N.: A framework for successful new product development. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Manage. 4, 746–770 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooper, R.G., Kleinschmidt, E.J.: Success factors in product innovation. Ind. Mark. Manage. 16, 215–223 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sadeghi, A., Azar, A., Rad, R.S.: Developing a fuzzy group AHP model for prioritizing the factors affecting success of high-tech SME’s in Iran: a case study. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 62, 957–961 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsai, C.C.: A research on selecting criteria for new green product development project: taking Taiwan consumer electronics products as an example. J. Clean. Prod. 25, 106–115 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Akgün, A.E., Byrne, J.C., Lynn, G.S., Keskin, H.: Team stressors, management support, and project and process outcomes in new product development projects. Technovation 27, 628–639 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun, H., Wing, W.C.: Critical success factors for new product development in the Hong Kong toy industry. Technovation 25, 293–303 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ernst, H., Hoyer, W.D.H., Rübsaamen, C.: Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: implications for Success. J. Mark. 74(5), 80–92 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kawazoe, M., Abetti, P.A.: Transition of strategy, marketing, R&D and new product development policies after mergers and acquisitions: a case study of superpower inc. under US, Dutch and Japanese ownership. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 66, 32–56 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nicholas, J., Ledwith, A., Aloini, D., Martini, A., Nosella, A.: Searching for radical new product ideas: exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 68, 70–98 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Felekoglu, B., Moultrie, J.: Top management involvement in new product development: a review and synthesis. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 31, 159–175 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rahab, C., Sulistyandari, S., Sudjono, S.: The development of innovation capability of small enterprises through knowledge sharing process: an empirical study of Indonesian creative industry. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2, 112–123 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mendes, G.H.D.S., Ganga, G.M.D.: Predicting success in product development: the application of principal component analysis to categorical data and binomial logistic regression. J. Technol. Manage. Innov. 8, 83–97 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Samli, A.C., Weber, J.A.E.: A theory of successful product breakthrough management: learning from success. J. Prod. Brand Manage. 9, 35–55 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eder, P.: Expert inquiry on innovation options for cleaner production in the chemical industry. J. Clean. Prod. 11, pp. 347e364 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roy, M.J., The´rin, F.: Knowledge acquisition and environmental commitment in SMEs. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 15, 249–259 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M.: Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 343–378 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhou, A.Z., Fink, D.: The intellectual capital web: a systematic linking of intellectual capital and knowledge management. J. Intellect. Capital 4, 34–48 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hsu, Y.H., Fang, W.: Intellectual capital and new product development performance: The mediating role of organizational learning capability. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 76, 664–677 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen, Y.S., Lin, M.J.J., Chang, C.H.: The influence of intellectual capital on new product development performance—the manufacturing companies of Taiwan as an example. Total Qual. Manag. 17, 1323–1339 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huang, X., Soutar, G.N., Brown, A.: Measuring new product success: an empirical investigation of Australian SMEs. Ind. Mark. Manage. 33, 117–123 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hart, S.: Dimensions of success in new product development: an exploratory investigation. J. Mark. Manage. 9, 23–41 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eid, R.: Factors affecting the success of world class manufacturing implementation in less developed countries: the case of Egypt. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage. 20, 989–1008 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gomes, J., Weerd-Nederhof, P., Pearson, A., Fissher, O.: Senior management support in new product development process. Creativity Innov. Manage. 10, 234–242 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rodríguez, N.G., Pérez, M.J.S., Gutiérrez, J.A.T.: Can a good organizational climate compensate for a lack of top management commitment to new product development? J. Bus. Res. 61, 118–131 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Swink, M.: Technological innovativeness as a moderator of new product design integration and top management support. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 17, 208–220 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Halman, J.I.M., Hofer, A., vanVuuren, W.: Platform-driven development of product families: linking theory with practice. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 20, 149–162 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haverila, M.J.: Product–firm compatibility in new product development in technology companies. J. High Technol. Manage. Res. 23, 130–141 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chiang, Y.H., Shih, H.A.: Knowledge-oriented human resource configurations, the new product development learning process, and perceived new product performance. Int. J. Hum. Res. Manage. 22, 3202–3221 (2011)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Martín-Rojas, R., García-Morales, V.J., García-Sánchez, E.: The influence on corporate entrepreneurship of technological variables. Ind. Manage. & Data Syst. 111, 984–1005 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Reilly, R.R., Chen, J.Y., Lynn, G.S.: Power and empowerment: the role of top management support and team empowerment in new product development. In: PICMET’03 Conference on Technology Management for Reshaping the World Proceedings,pp. 282–89 (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bao, G.M., Yang, J.:Dynamic competences and technological innovation in Chinese enterprises. In: Engineering Management Conference Proceedings,IEEE International, 1,pp. 454–458 (2004)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Johnson, W.H.A., Filippini, R.: Integration capabilities as mediator of product development practices–performance. J. Eng. Tech. Manage. 30, 95–111 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Medeiros, J.F.D., Ribeiro, J.L.D., Cortimiglia, M.N.: Success factors for environmentally sustainable product innovation: a systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 30, 1e11 (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bolívar-Ramos, M.T., García-Morales, V.J., Mihi-Ramírez, A.: Influence of technological distinctive competencies and organizational learning on organizational innovation to improve organizational performance. Econ. Manage. 16, 670–675 (2011)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lin, H.F.: Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower 28, 315–332 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Unger, B.N., Kock, A., Gemünden, H.G., Jonas, D.: Enforcing strategic fit of project portfolios by project termination: An empirical study on senior management involvement. Int. J. Project Manage. 30, 675–685 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kleinschmidt, E.J., De Brentani, U., Salomo, S.: Performance of global new product development programs: A resource-based view. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 24, 419–441 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jantunen, A.: Knowledge processing capability and innovative performance: an empirical study. European J. Innovation Manage. 8, 336–349 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yang, E., Ma, G., Chu, J.: The impact of financial constraints on firm R&D investments: empirical evidence from China. Int. J. Technol. Manage. 65, 172–188 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kim, B., Kim, J.: Structural factors of NPD (new product development) team for manufacturability. Int. J. Project Manage. 27, 690–702 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chang, P.L., Chen, K.L.: ‘The influence of input factors on new leading product development projects in Taiwan. Int. J. Project Manage. 22, 415–423 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hoyle, R.H.: The structural equation modelling approach: basic concepts and fundamental issues. In: Hoyle, R.H. (ed.) Structural equation modelling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, pp. 1–15. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA (1995)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rigdon, E.E.: Structural Equation Modeling. In: Marcoulides, G.A. (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research, pp. 251–294. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ (1998)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ong, C.S., Lai, J.Y., Wang, Y.S.: Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Inf. Manag. 41, 795–804 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hu, L., Bentler, P.M.: Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 3, 424–453 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bentler, P.M.: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107(2), 238 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chen, H.C.: The impact of children’s physical fitness on peer relations and self-esteem in school settings. Child Indic. Res. pp. 1–16 (2015)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C.: Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering EntrepreneurshipIIT KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations