Identification of Crack of Cantilever Beam Using Experimental Results and a Hybrid Neuro-GA Optimization Technique

  • Amit BanerjeeEmail author
  • Goutam Pohit
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)


In this paper, dynamic behavior of free transverse vibration of an isotropic beam having single crack has been captured for cantilever boundary condition. Condition of the crack is granted stay open throughout the operation. The free vibration experimentation is carried out by exciting the system at its deflected configuration with the blow of a hammer of soft rubber, and the feedback is collected by applying an accelerometer mounted on the test specimen. Then, finite element model of beam with different boundary conditions with single and multiple open and breathing transverse cracks is developed in ANSYS environment. Followed by cracked beam is modeled and three-dimensional FEM analysis is implemented using ANSYS. Comparison studies of experimental result with finite element analysis are executed. Results collected by the experimentation are applied in cascade neural network, genetic algorithm, and cascade neuro-GA crack identification optimization techniques. The ‘Inverse problem’ consists of calculating the damage parameters from the frequency shifts of crack beams. The merit and demerit of these optimization techniques are focused.


Free vibration Crack identification Experimentation FEM Cascade neural network Genetic algorithm 


  1. 1.
    Chondros, T.G., Dimarogonas, A.D.: Identification of cracks in welded joints of complex structures. J. Sound Vib. 69, 531–538 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sekhar, A.S., Prabhu, B.S.: Crack detection and vibration characteristics of cracked shaft. J. Sound Vib. 157, 375–381 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saavedra, P.N., Quitino, L.A.: Crack detection and vibration behavior of cracked beams. Comput. Struct. 79, 1451–1459 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sinha, J.K., Friswell, M.I.: Simulation of the dynamic response of a cracked beam. Comput. Struct. 80, 1473–1476 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zheng, D.Y., Kessissoglou, N.J.: Free vibration analysis of a cracked beam by finite element method. J. Sound Vib. 273, 457–475 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nahvi, H., Jabbari, M.: Crack detection in beams using experimental modal data and finite element model. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 47, 1477–1497 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patil, D.P., Maiti, S.K.: Experimental verification of a method of detection of multiple cracks in beams based on frequency measurements. J. Sound Vib. 281, 439–451 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choubey, A., Sehga, D.K., Tandon, N.: Finite element analysis of vessels to study changes in natural frequencies due to cracks. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 83, 181–187 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Orhan, S.: Crack detection in beams using experimental modal data and finite element model. NDT&E Int. 40, 443–450 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chondros, T.G., Labeas, G.N.: Torsional vibration of a cracked rod by variational formulation and numerical analysis. J. Sound Vib. 301, 994–1006 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yoon, H.I., Son, I.S., Ahn, S.J.: Free vibration analysis of Euler Bernoulli beam with double cracks. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 21, 476–485 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saridakis, K.M., Chasalevris, A.C., Papadopoulos, C.A., Dentsoras, A.J.: Applying neural networks, genetic algorithms and fuzzy logic for the identification of cracks in shafts by using coupled response measurements. Comput. Struct. 86, 1318–1338 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park, J.H., Kim, J.T., Hong, D.S., Ho, D.D., Yi, J.H.: Sequential damage detection approaches for beams using time-modal features and artificial neural networks. J. Sound Vib. 323, 451–474 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Singh, S.K., Tiwari, R.: Identification of multiple crack in a shaft system using transverse frequency response functions. Mech. Mach. Theor. 45, 1813–1827 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parhi, D.R., Dash, A.K.: Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 225, 1329–1339 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Buezas, F.S., Rosales, M.B., Filipich, C.P.: Damage detection with genetic algorithms taking into account a crack contact model. Eng. Fract. Mech. 78, 695–712 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Al-Ansari, L.S.: Calculating of natural frequency of stepping cantilever beam. Int. J. Mech. Mech. Eng. 12(5), 59–68 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mazanoglu, K., Sabuncu, M.: A frequency based algorithm for identification of single and double cracked beams via a statistical approach used in experiment. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 30, 168–185 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jena, P.C., Parhi, D.R., Pohit, G.: Faults detection of a single cracked beam by theoretical and experimental analysis using vibration signatures. J. Mech. Civil Eng. 4(3), 1–18 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thatoi, D., Guru, P., Jane, P.K., Choudhury, S., Das, H.C.: Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 1–13 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garg, S., Chawla, R., Singh, B.: Crack detection in cantilever beams using a new hybrid approach. Int. J. Mech. Prod. Eng. 2(4), 22–27 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jena, P.C., Parhi, D.R., Pohit, G.: Dynamic study of composite cracked beam by hanging the angle of bi-directional fibres. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. 40(1), 27–37 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Banerjee, A., Panigrahi, P., Pohit, G.: Nondestr. Test. Eval. 31, 142–164 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations