Parametric Optimization of TIG Welding Process on Mechanical Properties of 316L Stainless Steel Using RSM

  • Subhas Chandra MoiEmail author
  • Asish Bandyopadhyay
  • Pradip Kumar Pal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering book series (LNMUINEN)


The mechanical properties of welded joint mainly depend on the correct selection of welding process parameters. The present work has been planned to investigate the effects of process parameters such as welding current, welding speed and shielding gas flow rate on the weld joint quality for tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding of 316L austenitic stainless steel material. Experimental runs have been planned on TIG welding machine as per Box–Behnken design of response surface methodology (RSM). Based on the experimental data, the mathematical models have been developed by RSM to identify the effect of input process parameters on tensile properties. Optimization has been done to find out the most favourable welding parametric condition to achieve maximum ultimate tensile strength as well as percentage elongation of welded specimens simultaneously. Confirmatory tests have also been made at optimum parametric conditions to check/validate the accuracy of predicted welding condition. Good agreement has been identified between the predicted and measured values. The result indicates that the gas flow rate has the greatest influence on ultimate tensile strength and it is followed by welding current and travel speed. For percentage elongation, welding current is found to be the most influencing factor.


TIG welding Tensile strength Percentage elongation Response surface methodology Optimization 



Welding current (A)


Welding speed (cm/min)


Gas flow rate (l/min)


American Iron and Steel Institute


Analysis of variance


Degree of freedom


Gas flow rate


Percentage elongation


Response surface methodology


Tungsten inert gas


Ultimate tensile strength



The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. D. Bose, ME Department, NITTTR, Kolkata, West Bengal, for providing welding set-up for experiment for the present research work.


  1. 1.
    Ghosh, N., Pal, P.K., Nandi, G., Rudrapati, R.: Parametric optimization of gas metal arc welding process by PCA based Taguchi method on austenitic stainless steel AISI 316L. Mater. Today Proc. 5, 1620–1625 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tarng, Y.S., Yang, W.H.: Optimisation of the weld bead geometry in gas tungsten arc welding by the Taguchi method. Int. J. Adv. Manufact. Technol. 14, 549–554 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benyounis, K.Y., Olabi, A.G.: Optimization of different welding processes using statistical and numerical approaches—a reference guide. Adv. Eng. Softw. 39, 483–496 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gunaraj, V., Murugan, N.: Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged arc welding of pipes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 88(1–3), 266–275 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar, A., Sundarrajan, S.: Optimization of pulsed TIG welding process parameters on mechanical properties of AA 5456 aluminum alloy weldments. Mater. Des. 30, 1288–1297 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murugan, N., Parmer, R.S.: Effects of MIG process parameters on the geometry of the bead in the automatic surfacing of stainless steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 41(4), 381–398 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benyounis, K.Y., Olabi, A.G., Hashmi, M.S.J.: Optimizing the laser-welded butt joints of medium carbon steel using RSM. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 164165, 986–989 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y., Hu, W., Lai, X.: optimization of laser welding thin-gage galvanized steel via response surface methodology. Opt. Lasers Eng. 50, 1267–1273 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olabi, A.G., Alsinani, F.O., Alabdulkarim, A.A., Ruggiero, A., Tricarico, L., Benyounis, K.Y.: Optimizing the CO2 laser welding process for dissimilar materials. Opt. Lasers Eng. 51, 832–839 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahn, J., Chen, L., Davies, C.M., Dear, J.P.: Parametric optimisation and microstructural analysis on high power Yb-fibre laser welding of Ti-6Al-4V. Opt. Lasers Eng. 86, 156–171 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ragavendran, M., Chandrasekhar, N., Ravikumar, R., Saxena, R., Vasudevan, M., Bhaduri, A.K.: Optimization of hybrid laser-TIG welding of 316LN steel using response surface methodology (RSM). Opt. Lasers Eng. 94, 27–36 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Padmanaban, G., Balasubramanian, V.: optimization of laser beam welding process parameters to attain Maximum tensile strength in AZ31B magnesium alloy. Opt. Laser Technol. 42, 1253–1260 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elatharasan, G., Senthil Kumar, V.S.: An experimental analysis and optimization of process parameter on friction stir welding of AA 6061-T6 aluminum alloy using RSM. Procedia Engineering 64, 1227–1234 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Srivastava, S., Garg, R.K.: Process parameter optimization of gas metal arc welding on IS:2062 mild steel using response surface methodology. J. Manufact. Process. 25, 296–305 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lakshminarayanan, A.K., Shanmugam, K., Balasubramanian, V.: Effect of autogenous arc welding processes on tensile and impact properties of ferritic stainless steel joints. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 16(1), 62–68 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumar, N., Mukherjee, M., Bandyopadhyay, A.: Study on laser welding of austenitic stainless steel by varying incident angle of pulsed laser beam. Opt. Laser Technol. 94, 296–309 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghosh, N., Pal, P.K., Nandi, G.: Parametric optimization of MIG welding on 316L austenitic stainless steel by Grey-Based Taguchi method. Procedia Technol. 25, 1038–1048 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghosh, N., Rudrapati, R., Pal, P.K., Goutam, N.: Parametric optimization of gas metal arc welding process by using Taguchi method on ferritic stainless steel AISI 409. Mater. Today Proc. 4, 2213–2221 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Subhas Chandra Moi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Asish Bandyopadhyay
    • 1
  • Pradip Kumar Pal
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations