Advertisement

Conclusion: Beyond Religion and Emergent Socio-political Counterpoints

  • Edlyne Eze Anugwom
Chapter
Part of the New Directions in Islam book series (NDI)

Abstract

The chapter contends inter alia that the Boko Haram insurgence has been driven largely by the structural character of the Nigerian state. These characteristics range from poor governance, political patronage to corruption and decadent political elites. Thus, Boko Haram has been able to thrive not only because of incendiary preaching or demeaning socio-economic conditions in the Northeast but as a result of a constellation of factors. Also, critical features and influences on the insurgence range from robust historical antecedents to an ideology webbed around the immediacy of jihad and revival of Shari’a. Apart from a nuanced de-radicalization programme, the response to the insurgence should be comprehensive and embody actions on the micro/individual level, meso/immediate milieu and the macro level of the state in Nigeria. However, all these should not be anchored on a simple perception of Boko Haram as a terrorist group, since the sect is much more complex than this and responds largely to socio-structural factors and forces in Nigeria.

References

  1. Adesoji, A. (2010). The Boko Haram Uprising and Islamic Revivalism in Nigeria. Africa Spectrum, 45(2), 95–108.Google Scholar
  2. Aghedo, I. (2014). Old Wine in a New Wine Bottle: Ideological and Operational Linkages Between Maitatsine and Boko Haram Revolts in Nigeria. African Security, 7, 229–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anugwom, E. E. (2003). The Future as the Past: Inter-group Relations in Nigeria in Historical Perspective. In O. Akpan-Umana (Ed.), The Art and Science of Politics: Essays in Honour of Alhaji Ghali Umar Na’Abba (pp. 165–183). Port-Harcourt: Footsteps Pub.Google Scholar
  4. Bale, J. (2009). Islamism and Totalitarianism. Totalitarianism Movements and Political Religions, (June): 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Comolli, V. (2015). Boko Haram: Nigeria’s Islamist Insurgency. London: Hurst and Co.Google Scholar
  6. Higazi, A., Kendhammer, B., Mohammed, K., Montclos, P. M., & Thurston, A. (2018). A Response to Jacon Zenn on Boko Haram and al-Qaida. Perspectives on Terrorism, 12(2), 203–213.Google Scholar
  7. Kundnani, A. (2012). Radicalization: The Journey of a Concept. Race and Class, 54(2), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Loimeier, R. (2012). Boko Haram: The Development of a Militant Religious Movement in Nigeria. Africa Spectrum, 47(2–3), 137–155.Google Scholar
  9. Moghadam, F. M. (2009). De-radicalisation and the Staircase from Terrorism. In D. Canter (Ed.), The Faces of Terrorism: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Mohammed, K. (2015). The Message and Methods of Boko Haram. In M. P. de Monteclos (Ed.), Boko Haram: Islamism, Politics, Security and the State in Nigeria (pp. 3–31). Los Angeles and Addis Ababa: Tsehai and African Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Rivers, E.C. (2015). Boko Haram: The History of Africa’s Most Notorious Terrorist Group. NPP: No Place of Publication.Google Scholar
  12. Roelofs, P. (2015). Framing and Blaming: Discourse Analysis of the Boko Haram Uprising, July 2009. In M. P. de Monteclos (Ed.), Boko Haram: Islamism, Politics, Security and the State in Nigeria (pp. 127–152). Los Angeles and Addis Ababa: Tsehai and African Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Vanguard Newspaper. (2011). We are on a Revenge Mission, Boko Haram Suspect Tells the Court. Retrieved October 5, 2012, from http://www.vanguardngr.com/2011/11/we-are-on-revenge-mission-boko-haram-suspect-tells-court.htm.
  14. Walker, A. (2016). ‘Eat the Heart of the Infidel’: The Harrowing of Nigeria and the Rise of the Boko Haram. London: G. Hurst and Co. (Pub.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edlyne Eze Anugwom
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyUniversity of Nigeria NsukkaNsukkaNigeria

Personalised recommendations