Advertisement

Ethical Issues in Consumer Informatics and Online Content

  • John Wilbanks
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter will address ethical issues in consumer informatics and online content, including quality assurance, privacy and security concerns, consent and governance, and the important role consumer information plays in shared decision-making. If privacy concerns have slowed the progress of research, new approaches such as a pool of freely available health and genomic data could accelerate innovation. This chapter will describe the range of ethical perspectives on data sharing and propose a new approach using free and open-source tools to support ethical transactions involving consumers, researchers, and health systems.

Keywords

Consent e-Consent Governance Privacy Information security Informedness Genomic data Dark patterns Data sharing Nothing about me without me 

References

  1. Beymer, D., Orton, P., & Russell, D. (2007). An eye tracking study of how pictures influence online reading. In C. Baranauskas, P. Palanque, J. Abascal, & S. D. J. Barbosa (Eds.), Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2007. INTERACT 2007, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 4663). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74800-7_41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brignull, H. (2013, August 29). Dark Patterns: Inside the interfaces designed to trick you. Retrieved May 11, 2017, from https://www.theverge.com/2013/8/29/4640308/dark-patterns-inside-the-interfaces-designed-to-trick-you
  3. Cassileth, B. R., Zupkis, R. V., Sutton-Smith, K., & March, V. (1980). Informed consent—Why are its goals imperfectly realized? The New England Journal of Medicine, 302(16), 896–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan, Y. Y., Wang, P., Tignor, N., et al. (2017). The Asthma Mobile Health Study, a large-scale clinical observational study using ResearchKit. Nature Biotechnology, 35, 354–362.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3826 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daugherty, C., Ratain, M. J., Grochowski, E., Stocking, C., EKodish, E., Mick, R., & Siegler, M. (1995). Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 13(5), 1062–1072.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delbanco, T., Berwick, D. M., Boufford, J. I., et al. (2001). Healthcare in a land called PeoplePower: Nothing about me without me. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 4(3), 144–150.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00145.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldhaber, M. H. (1997). The attention economy and the net. First Monday 2.4. Retrieved May 11, 2017, from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/519/440
  8. Haghi, M., Thurow, K., & Stoll, R. (2017). Wearable devices in medical Internet of things: Scientific research and commercially available devices. Healthcare Informatics Research, 23(1), 4–15.  https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2017.23.1.4 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kass, N. E., Chaisson, L., Taylor, H. A., & Lohse, J. (2011). Length and complexity of U.S. and international HIV consent forms from federal HIV network trials. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(11), 1324–1328.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lavelle-Jones, C., Byrne, D. J., Rice, P., & Cuschieri, A. (1993). Factors affecting quality of informed consent. British Medical Journal, 306, 885.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lorigo, L., Haridasan, M., Brynjarsdóttir, H., Xia, L., Joachims, T., Gay, G., … Pan, B. (2008). Eye tracking and online search: Lessons learned and challenges ahead. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 1041–1052.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20794 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McConnell, M. V., Shcherbina, A., Pavlovic, A., et al. (2017). Feasibility of obtaining measures of lifestyle from a smartphone app: The MyHeart Counts Cardiovascular Health Study. JAMA Cardiology, 2(1), 67–76.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2016.4395 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Murray, B. (2012). Informed consent: What must a physician disclose to a patient? Virtual Mentor, AMA Journal of Ethics 14(7):563–566. Retrieved August 19, 2017, from http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2012/07/hlaw1-1207.html
  14. Obar, J. A., & Oeldorf-Hirsch, A. (2016, August 24). The biggest lie on the Internet: Ignoring the privacy policies and terms of service policies of social networking services.In TPRC 44: The 44th Research Conference on Communication, Information and Internet Policy 2016. Retrieved May 11, 2017, from SSRN: https://ssm.com/abstract=2757466 or  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssm.2757465
  15. Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Taylor, H. A., & Brancati, F. L. (2003). Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. The New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 721–726.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schultz, A. L., Pardee, G. P., & Ensinck, J. W. (1975). Are research subjects really informed? Western Journal of Medicine, 123(1), 76–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Wager, E., Tooley, P. J., Emanuel, M. B., & Wood, S. F. (1995). How to do it. Get patients’ consent to enter clinical trials. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 311(7007), 734–737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weinreich, H., Obendorf, H., Herder, E., & Mayer, M. (2008, February) Not quite the average: An empirical study of Web use. Association for Computing Machinery Transactions on the Web. 2(1)—also see study data reanalyzed at How Little Do Users Read? Retrieved October 19, 2015, from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-little-do-users-read/ Published May 6, 2008.
  19. Wilbanks, J., & Friend, S. H. (2016). First, design for data sharing. Nature Biotechnology, 34(4), 377–379.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3516 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Wilbanks
    • 1
  1. 1.Sage BionetworksWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations