Advertisement

Leveraging Consumer Health IT to Incentivize Engagement and Shared Accountability in Value-Based Purchasing

  • Erin Holve
Chapter

Abstract

Health care payers (self-insured employers, insurance companies, state Medicaid agencies, etc.) are increasingly playing a role as thoughtful purchasers of health care. In these new value-based purchasing (VBP) initiatives, the focus is on paying for value rather than volume of services, an endeavor necessitating robust health information technology (IT). Successful efforts to implement VBP methodologies, from pay for performance to global budgets, entail a coevolution of technology; practice change designed to achieve benchmarks; and ongoing improvement against strategic quality measures. Ideally, this integrated approach to health system redesign will align technology, workflow, and quality with the goal of improving health outcomes. A key goal of VBP is for payers and purchasers to balance provider incentives and accountability in a way that supports patient-centered care and consumer engagement. Involving consumers (e.g., beneficiaries, patients, and caregivers) in the design and implementation of health IT is one important tactic to ensure the tools and programs that are developed are responsive to consumer’s needs. Promising future directions include efforts to incorporate social determinants of health into care and VBP, and developing a broader perspective on whole-person care. Both are only possible with robust consumer-facing health IT. The ultimate goal for policy and practice is to engage consumers and patients the design and implementation of health IT systems and VBP programs that promote health and well-being.

Keywords

Alternative Payment Models Person-Centered Care Value-Based Purchasing Quality payment program Person-centered thinking Health IT Triple aim Pay for Performance Global budgets Consumerism Patient Portals 

References

  1. Adler, J., Saeed, S. A., Eslick, I. S., Provost, L., Margolis, P. A., & Kaplan, H. C. (2016). Appreciating the nuance of daily symptom variation to individualize patient care. eGEMs, 4(1), 1247.  https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1247 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, N., Cutler, D.M., Fielding, J, Galea, S., Glymour, M., Koh, H., Satcher, D. (2016). Addressing social determinants of health and health disparities a vital direction for health and health care. National Academy of Medicine, September 2016. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Adler-Milstein, J., Embi, P., Middleton, B., Sarkar, I. N., & Smith, J. (2017). Crossing the health IT chasm: Considerations and policy recommendations to overcome current challenges and enable value-based care. JAMA, 24, 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2002). Evaluating the impact of value-based purchasing: A guide for purchaser: A guide for purchasers. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from http://archive.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/quality-resources/value/valuebased/evalvbp1.html
  5. Bayliss, E. A., Powers, J. D., Ellis, J. L., Barrow, J. C., Strobel, M., & Beck, A. (2016). Applying sequential analytic methods to self-reported information to anticipate care needs. eGEMs, 4(1), 1258.  https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1258 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2016a). A Blueprint for the CMS Measures Management System, Version 11.2. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/MMS/Downloads/Blueprint112.pdf
  7. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2016b). Delivery System Fact Sheet, Consumer-Facing Healthcare Cost and Quality Tools. A Consumer Reports Issue Brief. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from http://nyshealthfoundation.org/uploads/resources/consumer-facing-health-care-cost-quality-tools-consumer-reports-brief.pdf
  8. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2016c, January 26). Better care, Smarter spending, Healthier people: Improving our health care delivery system. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/mediareleasedatabase/fact-sheets/2015-fact-sheets-items/2015-01-26.html.
  9. Chenok, K., Teleki, S., SooHoo, N. F., Huddleston, J., & Bozic, K. J. (2015). Collecting patient-reported outcomes: Lessons from the California joint replacement registry. eGEMs, 3(1), 1196.  https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1196 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chesapeake Regional Information System for Our Patients. (n.d.). CQM-Aligned population health reporting. Retrieved May 1, 2017, from https://crisphealth.org/services/cqm-aligned-population-health-reporting-caliphr-tool/
  11. Consumer Reports. Get Safe, Effective Care for a Fair Price. (2016). Consumer Health Choices. Retrieved May 17, 2017, from http://consumerhealthchoices.org/smarter-safer-patients/
  12. District of Columbia Department of Disability Services. (n.d.). Person-centered thinking philosophy. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from https://dds.dc.gov/page/person-centered-thinking-philosophy
  13. Foraker, R. E., Kite, B., Kelley, M. M., Lai, A. M., Roth, C., Lopetegui, M. A., … Payne, P. R. O. (2015). EHR-based visualization tool: Adoption rates, satisfaction, and patient outcomes. eGEMs, 3(2), 1159.  https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1159 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hartzler, A. L., Chaudhuri, S., Fey, B. C., Flum, D. R., & Lavallee, D. (2015). Integrating patient-reported outcomes into spine surgical care through visual dashboards: Lessons learned from human-centered design. eGEMs, 3(2), 1133.  https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1133 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Institute of Medicine. (2000). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century). Washington, DC. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from http://www.nap.edu/books/0309072808/html/
  16. Institute of Medicine. (2003). The future of the public’s health in the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10548
  17. Irizarry, T., DeVito Dabbs, A., & Curran, C. R. (2015). Patient portals and patient engagement: A state of the science review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(6), e148.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4255 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2016). Kaiser Family Foundation estimates based on the Census Bureau's March 2014, March 2015, and march 2016 current population survey (CPS: Annual Social and Economic Supplements).Google Scholar
  19. Kliff, S. (2015, October 29). I thought people should shop for more healthcare. Then I Tried It.” Vox Media. Retrieved May 10, 2017, from https://www.vox.com/2015/10/19/9567991/health-care-shopping-mri
  20. Lavallee, D., Chenok, K. E., Love, R. M., Petersen, C., Holve, E., Segal, C. D., & Patricia, D. (2016). Franklin, incorporating patient-reported outcomes into health care to engage patients and enhance care. Health Affairs (Millwood), 35(4), 575–582.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lyles, C. R., Allen, J. Y., Poole, D., Tieu, L., Kanter, M. H., & Garrido, T. (2016). “I want to keep the personal relationship with my doctor”: Understanding barriers to portal use among African Americans and Latinos. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(10), e263.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5910 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manary, M., Staelin, R, Kosel, K., Schulman, K., & Glickman, S. (2014). Organizational characteristics and patient experiences with hospital care. American Journal of Medical Quality, 30(5), 432–440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860614539994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGinnis, J. M., Williams-Russo, P., & Knickman, J. R. (2002). The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Affairs (Millwood), 21, 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McMillan S.S., Kendall E., Sav A., King M.A, Whitty J.A. Kelly F., Wheeler A.J. (2013). Patient-centered approaches to health care: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Med Care Res Rev.Google Scholar
  25. Mitchell, A. J., Yadegarfar, M., Gill, J., & Stubbs, B. (2016). Case finding and screening clinical utility of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9 and PHQ-2) for depression in primary care: A diagnostic meta-analysis of 40 studies. BJPsych Open, 2(2), 127–138.  https://doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.001685 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. National Association of Community Health Centers. (2016). What is PRAPARE? Retrieved May 17, 2017, from http://www.nachc.org/research-and-data/prapare/
  27. National Institutes of Health. (2017). Patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Retrieved May 1, 2015, from http://www.nihpromis.org/measures/availableinstruments
  28. National Quality Forum. (2013). Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Performance Measurement. Retrieved May 1, 2017, from https://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2012/12/PatientReported_Outcomes_in_Performance_Measurement.aspx
  29. Patterson, E. S., Lowry, S. Z., Ramaiah, M., Gibbons, M. C., Brick, D., Calco, R., & Ferrer, J. A. (2015). Improving clinical workflow in ambulatory care: Implemented recommendations in an innovation prototype for the Veteran’s health administration. eGEMs, 3(2), 1149.  https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1149 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Payne, P. R. O. (2013). Advancing user experience research to facilitate and enable patient-centered research: Current state and future directions. eGEMs, 1(1), 1026.  https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1026 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Revere, D., Dixon, B. E., Hills, R., Williams, J. L., & Grannis, S. J. (2014). Leveraging health information exchange to improve population health reporting processes: Lessons in using a collaborative-participatory design process. EGEMS, 2(3), 1082.  https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1082 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rolfson, O., Wissig, S., van Maasakkers, L., Stowell, C., Ackerman, I., Ayers, D., & Franklin, P. D. (2016). Defining an international standard set of outcome measures for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: Consensus of the international consortium for health outcomes measurement hip and knee osteoarthritis working group. Arthritis Care & Research, 68(11), 1631–1639.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rybowski, M, Eichler R. (1997). Theory and reality of value-based purchasing: Lessons from the pioneers. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR Publication No. 98–0004.Google Scholar
  34. Seeking Alpha. (2014, March 18). U.S. IPO recap: Castlight Health's 149% pop shows healthy tech demand. Retrieved May 15, 2017, from https://seekingalpha.com/article/2094893-u-s-ipo-recap-castlight-healths-149-percent-pop-shows-healthy-tech-demand
  35. Snyder, C., Wu, A (Eds). (2017). Users guide to integrating patient reported outcomes in electronic health records. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute.Google Scholar
  36. Sorondo, B., Allen, A., Bayleran, J., Doore, S., Fathima, S., Sabbagh, I., & Newcomb, L. (2016). Using a patient portal to transmit patient reported health information into the electronic record: Workflow implications and user experience. eGEMs, 4(3), 1237.  https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1237 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spencer, A., Freda, B, McGinnis, T, Gottleib, L. (2016, December). Measuring social determinants of health among medicaid beneficiaries: Early state lessons. Center for Health Care Strategies. Retrieved May 3, 2017, from http://www.chcs.org/media/CHCS-SDOH-Measures-Brief_120716_FINAL.pdf
  38. The Health Foundation. (2014). Helping measure person-centred care. Evidence Review. Retrieved April 15, 2017, from http://www.health.org.uk/sites/health/files/HelpingMteasurePersonCentredCare.pdf
  39. Wilcox, A. B.; Gallagher, K.; and Bakken, S. (2013). Security approaches in using tablet computers for primary data collection in clinical research. eGEMs, 1(1), 7. doi:  https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin Holve
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Health Care FinanceGovernment of the District of ColumbiaWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations