Advertisement

Comparative Studies on Pattern and Ecosystem Services of the Traditional Rice Agricultural Landscapes in East Asia

  • Yuanmei Jiao
  • Toshiya Okuro
  • Kazuhiko Takeuchi
  • Luohui Liang
  • Xuan Gao
Chapter
Part of the Environmental History book series (ENVHIS, volume 9)

Abstract

The traditional agricultural landscape is a multifunctional geographic object, which can provide multiple ecosystem services for human beings due to complex interactions between components, patterns, processes, and dynamics. Taking the Satoyama landscape in Japan and the Hani terrace landscape in southwestern China as objects, this paper reviews and compares their patterns and multiple ecosystem services. The results indicate that both landscapes are composed of similar elements, including forests, villages, wet rice paddies or terraces, grasslands, streams, ponds, and irrigation ditches. However, they differ in distributing area, spatial pattern, ecosystem services, and socio-ecological pressures. The main elements of the traditional Satoyama landscape are secondary forests and small, gently sloping, rice paddies. Its spatial pattern is a heterogeneous mosaic of seminatural ecosystems, and the prevailing ecological process is the flow of organic fertilizer. As the landscape has been abandoned because of various social pressures (the aging farming population, urbanization, and economic globalization), its current ecological service is mainly cultural—providing Japan with a symbol of traditional rural lifestyle. The Hani terraces are still a vigorous, living landscape, which provides all kinds of ecological services for local people and tourists. This life in the landscape stems from its reciprocal effects, feedbacks among the vertically ordered components of natural and seminatural forests, villages, and huge, steeply sloping rice terraces. Because they are traditional agricultural landscapes, both the Hani terraces and the Satoyama are facing continuous pressures from social and economic development. Learning the efficient, adaptive management strategies from Satoyama can help Hani rice terraces meet the challenges.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (E-0902) of Japan’s Ministry of the Environment, and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 40401022, 41271203, 41761115). The authors also thank for Anton Pijl and the other anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments, and the editors for their editing of the manuscript.

References

  1. Daily G (ed) (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) (2009) http://www.fao.org/statistics/en. Accessed 15 Apr 2018
  3. Fukamachi K, Oku H, Nakashizuka T (2001) The change of a Satoyama landscape and its causality in Kamiseya, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan between 1970 and 1995. Landsc Ecol 16:703–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fukamachi K, Miki Y, Oku H, Miyoshi I (2011) The biocultural link: isolated trees and hedges in Satoyama landscapes indicate a strong connection between biodiversity and local cultural features. Landsc Ecol Eng 7(2):195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guo ZW, Xiao XM, Li DM (2000) An assessment of ecosystem services: water flow regulation and hydroelectric power production. Ecol Appl 10:925–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. JG (Japanese Government) (2007) The third national biodiversity strategy of Japan. http://www.env.go.jp/en/focus/attach/071210-e.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2017
  7. Jiao YM, Li X, Liang LH, Takeuchi K, Okuro T, Zhang D, Sun L (2012) Indigenous ecological knowledge and natural resource management in the cultural landscape of China’s Hani terraces. Ecol Res 27(2):247–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiao YM, Liang LH, Okuro T, Takeuchi K (2014) Ecosystem service and biodiversity of traditional agricultural landscapes: a case study of Hani terraces in SW China. In: Hong S, Bogaert J, Min Q (eds) Biocultural landscape: changing knowledge and value. Springer, pp 81–88Google Scholar
  9. Kobori H, Primac R (2003) Participatory conservation approaches for Satoyama, the traditional forest and agricultural landscape of Japan. Ambio 32(4):307–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kremen C, Ostfeld RS (2005) A call to ecologists: measuring, analyzing, and managing ecosystem services. Front Ecol Environ 3:540–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystem and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Matson PA, Parton WZ, Power AG, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Peterjohn WT, Correll DL (1984) Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest. Ecology 65(5):1466–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ren RG (2010) Fifty thousands mu Hani terraced fields were dried by high temperature and no rain. Chuncheng Evening News, April 17. (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. Statistics Bureau (2011) Statistical handbook of Japan. http://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/pdf/2011all.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2018
  16. Swinton SM, Lupi F, Roberson GP, Hamilton SK (2007) Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol Econ 64:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Takeuchi K (2010) Rebuilding the relationship between people and nature: the Satoyama initiative. Ecol Res 25(5):891–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Takeuchi K, Brown RD, Washitani I, Tsunekawa A, Yokohari M (eds) (2003) Satoyama: the traditional rural landscape of Japan. Springer, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  19. Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Washitani I (2001) Traditional sustainable ecosystem “SATOYAMA” and biodiversity crisis in Japan conservation ecological perspective. Glob Environ Res 5(2):119–133Google Scholar
  22. Yamamoto S (2001) Studies on the effect of changes in rural landscape structure on secondary forest plants in Japanese rural areas. Bull Natl Inst Agroenviron Sci 20:1–105Google Scholar
  23. Zhang W, Ricketts TH, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton SM (2007) Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol Econ 64:253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zuo XJ (2005) The first drying crack of Hani terraced fields within hundred years. Beijing Youth Daily, June 1. (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuanmei Jiao
    • 1
  • Toshiya Okuro
    • 2
  • Kazuhiko Takeuchi
    • 2
  • Luohui Liang
    • 3
  • Xuan Gao
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Tourism and Geography ScienceYunnan Normal UniversityKunmingP.R. China
  2. 2.Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Institute for Sustainability and PeaceThe United Nations UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations