The physicist Richard Feynman, during his commencement address at Cal Tech (1974), once uttered that it was necessary to be honest. This he believed was a cornerstone of scientific integrity. As scientists, we often strive to create open forums of dialogue through experiments and publications. However, an important and a necessary step, which is often neglected, is the reporting of the limitations. The fear is that this will jeopardize the acceptance of our material. Nothing could be furthest from the truth. The reporting of potential limitations offers incentives to authors, scientists, and researchers, for their discussion helps to foster as well as shape future research, benefiting scientific inquiry. In this chapter, several limitations are discussed in order to provide a frank and unbiased discourse of the importance of stretch intensity and the inflammatory response. What is presented is the reasoning behind the judgement of the limitation(s).
KeywordsBlood collection Methodology Compliance Stretching intensity Duration Frequency Nutrition Mental stress Age
- Marino, A., & Giotta, N. (2008). Cinacalcet, fetuin-A and interleukin-6. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, 23, 1461.Google Scholar
- Nz, R. (2011). Macronutrients. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Samols, D., Agrawal, A., & Kushner, I. (2002). Acute phase proteins. Cytokine Reference On-line, (Feldman, J.J. and Oppenheim, J.J., ed). Academic Press, Harcourt, London, 1–16.Google Scholar
- Streetz, K. L., Wustefeld, T., Klein, C., Manns, M. P., & Trautwein, C. (2001). Mediators of inflammation and acute phase response in the liver. Cellular and Molecular Biology (Noisy-le-Grand, France), 47, 661–673.Google Scholar