Advertisement

Automation of Impulse Processes Control in Cognitive Maps with Multirate Sampling Based on Weights Varying

  • Victor D. RomanenkoEmail author
  • Yuriy L. Milyavsky
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)

Abstract

Automated control systems for multirate impulse processes in cognitive maps are considered. Some coordinates of the cognitive map can be measured and changed with small sampling period while others need longer sampling period. Thus, the impulse process is decomposed into two subsystems described as first-order difference equations systems with different sampling periods. Effects of the fast subsystem on the slow subsystem and vice versa are considered as disturbances which should be suppressed. Control for both subsystems is implemented not via external inputs (i.e. varying resources of the cognitive map) but via map’s edges varying, which means that decision-maker modifies degree of influence of one cognitive map node on another one. Two approaches for control system design are proposed. The first approach is based on invariant ellipsoids method which allows robust stabilization of the system. The second approach is based on generalized variance minimization which allows setting some of the coordinates at predefined levels. Both approaches are verified on the real cognitive map of IT company HR management process.

References

  1. 1.
    Roberts, F.: Discrete Mathematical Models with Applications to Social, Biological, and Environmental Problems. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall (1976)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Romanenko, V., Milyavsky, Y.: Stabilizing of impulse processes in cognitive maps based on state-space models. Syst. Res. Inf. Technol. 1, 26–42 (2014) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Romanenko, V., Milyavsky, Y., Reutov, A.: Adaptive control method for unstable impulse processes in cognitive maps based on reference model. J. Autom. Inf. Sci. 47(3), 11–23 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Romanenko, V., Milyavsky, Y.: Impulse processes stabilization in cognitive maps of complex systems based on modal regulators. Cybern. Comput. Eng. 179, 43–55 (2015) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zgurovsky, M., Romanenko, V., Milyavsky, Y.: Principles and methods of impulse processes control in cognitive maps of complex systems. Part I. J. Autom. Inf. Sci. 48(1), 36–45 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Romanenko, V., Milyavsky, Y.: Adaptive coordinating control of interacting cognitive maps’ vertices relations in impulse mode. Syst. Res. Inf. Technol. 3, 109–120 (2015) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Romanenko, V., Milyavsky, Y.: Control method in cognitive maps based on weights increments. Cybern. Comput. Eng. 184, 44–55 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zgurovsky, M., Romanenko, V., Milyavsky, Y.: Adaptive control of impulse processes in complex systems cognitive maps with multirate coordinates sampling. In: Sadovnichiy, V., Zgurovsky, M. (eds.) Advances in Dynamical Systems and Control, vol. 69, pp. 363–374. Springer International Publishing, Basel (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Polyak, B., Scherbakov, P.: Robust Stability and Control. Nauka, Moscow (2002) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nazin, S., Polyak, B., Topunov, M.: Rejection of bounded exogenous disturbances by the method of invariant ellipsoids. Autom. Remote. Control. 68(3), 467–486 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    SeDuMi. Optimization over symmetric cones. Available via http://sedumi.ie.lehigh.edu/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Applied System AnalysisNational Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”KyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations