Advertisement

Numerical Modeling of the Wing Aerodynamics at Angle-of-Attack at Low Reynolds Numbers

  • Iryna M. Gorban
  • Oleksiy G. Lebid
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)

Abstract

Flows over symmetrical airfoils are numerically investigated for Reynolds number of 500. The high-resolution vortex method is used for the computations. The effects of both airfoil thickness and angle-of-attack (AoA) on non-linear wake and aerodynamic loads are examined. When increasing AoA from 0 to 60, a flow regime in the airfoil wake was found to change from stationary to multiperiodic one through the Hopf bifurcation and period-doubling bifurcation. The highest lift-drag ratio of the airfoil is achieved in the stationary regime, when AoA< 15. With further increase in the angle-of-attack, the airfoil performance drops due to increment in the drag force. The obtained results show that a thinner airfoil has better hydrodynamic characteristics but the effect of thickness is considerable in the stationary regime only. The analysis of pressure fields shows that negative pressure zones form not only in the airfoil frontal part, as at large Reynolds numbers, but near the trailing edge that is due to effect of boundary layer. The intensity of those grows with increasing an angle-of-attack.

References

  1. 1.
    Ifju, P., Stanford, B., Sytsma M., Albertani, R.: Analysis of a flexible wing micro air vehicle. AIAA Paper 3311 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dickinson, M.H., Geotz, K.G.: Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low Reynolds numbers. J. Exp. Biol. 174, 45–64 (1993)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, Z.J.: Vortex shedding and frequency selection in flapping flight. J. Fluid Mech. 410, 323–341 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taira, K., Colonius, T.: Three-dimensional flows around low-aspect-ratio flat-plate wings at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 623, 187–207 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, J., Liu, N.-S., Lu, X.-Y.: Route to a chaotic state in fluid flow past an inclined flat plate. J. Phys. Rev. 79, 045306: 1–4 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang, D., Pettersen, B., Andersson, H.I., Narasimhamurthy, V.D.: Numerical simulation of flow past a rectangular flat plate. In: Proceeds of V European Conference on Computer Fluid Dynamics, Lisbon, 14–17 June (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu, D., Mei, R., Shyy, W. A multi-block lattice Boltzmann method for viscous fluid flows. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 39, 99–120 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lockard, D.P., Luo, L.-S., Milder, S.D., Singer, B.A. Evaluation of power FLOW for aerodynamics applications. J. Stat. Phys. 107, 423–478 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kunz, P.J., Kroo, I.: Analysis, design and testing of airfoils for use at ultra-low Reynolds numbers. In: Mueller, T.J. (ed.) Univ. of Notr-Dam, Proceeds of the Conference on Fixed, Flapping and Rotary Vehicles at Very Low Reynolds Numbers, pp. 349–372 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mueller, T.J., Batillt, S.M.: Experimental studies of separation on a two-dimensional airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA J. 20(4), 457–463 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sunada, S., Sakaguchi, A., Kawachi, K.: Airfoil section characteristics at a low Reynolds number. J. Fluids Eng. 119, 129–135 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sunada S., Kawachi, K.: Comparison of wing characteristics at an ultralow Reynolds number. J. Aircraft 39, 331–338 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cottet, G.-H., Koumoutsakos, P. Vortex Methods: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, London (2000)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vortex methods. In: Kamemoto, Tsutahara (eds.) Proceeds of the 1-st International Conference of Vortex Motions. World Scientific, Singapore (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chornyy, G.G.: Gas Dynamics. Nauka, Moscow (1988) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shiels, D.: Simulation of controlled bluff body flow with a viscous vortex method, PhD thesis. California Institute of Technology (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koumoutsakos, P., Leonard, A., Pepin, F.: Boundary conditions for viscous vortex methods. J. Comput. Phys. 113, 52–61 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gorban, V., Gorban, I.: Vortical flow structure near a square prism: numerical model and algorithms of control. J Appl. Hydromech. 7, 8–26 (2005) (in Ukrainian)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gorban, I.M., Khomenko, O.V.: Flow control near a square prism with the help of frontal flat plates. In: Zgurovsky, M.Z., Sadovnichiy, V.A. (eds.) Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. Advances in Dynamical Systems and Control, vol. 69, pp. 327–350. Springer, Berlin (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kempka, S.N., Glass, M.W., Peery, J.S., Strickland, J.H.: Accuracy consideration for implementing velocity boundary conditions in vorticity formulations. SANDIA Reports N. SAND. 96-0583, UC-700 (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ploumhans, P., Winckelmans, G.S.: Vortex methods for high-resolution simulations of viscous flow past bluff bodies of general geometry. J. Comput. Phys. 165, 354–406 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Belotserkovsky, S.M., Kotovsky, V.N., Nisht, M.I., Fedorov, R.M. Mathematical simulation of two-dimensional parallel separation flows near bodies. Nauka, Moscow (1988) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karniadakis, G.E., Triantafyllou, G.S. Three-dimensional dynamics and transition to turbulence in the wake of bluff objects. J. Fluid Mech. 238, 1–30 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iryna M. Gorban
    • 1
  • Oleksiy G. Lebid
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Hydromechanics, National Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine
  2. 2.Institute of Telecommunications and Global Information Space, National Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations