Imaging Techniques for Forensic Radiology in Living Individuals

  • Alfonso Reginelli
  • Anna Russo
  • Elisa Micheletti
  • Roberto Picascia
  • Antonio Pinto
  • Sabrina Giovine
  • Salvatore Cappabianca
  • Roberto GrassiEmail author


Forensic radiology is the application of diagnostic imaging used like source of information in medico-legal issues, because with its technology and examinations it can establish a source for scientific evidence that can be reliable and precise; moreover every diagnostic imaging examination can be considered a forensic examination (Kudlad et al., The state of forensic radiography in the United States, American Society of Radiologic Technologists, Albuquerque, NM, 2010). Judge Owen E. Lefevre was the first USA judge to admit radiographs as evidence in a civil case in 1896 (Adams, An introduction to forensic imaging). From that year, the use of computed tomography (CT) in forensic investigation is growing and even other technologies that were used just for clinically purpose are now considered useful for forensic investigation.

Forensic radiology comprises, at first instance, digital radiography and CT. All forensic examinations and procedures are performed with quality and safety as priorities. This practice involves hospitals, private physician offices and outpatient imaging centres and the produced images are useful clinically and legally. Therefore it is very important to ensure that the radiology technicians, who practically produce the image, understand the medical-legal aspects and that every patient may be a victim of non-accidental injuries (Adams, An introduction to forensic imaging).


Forensic radiology Injured children Women violence Elder abuse Body packing Penetrating tools 


  1. 1.
    Brogdon BG (1998) Scope of forensic radiology. In: Brogdon BG (ed) Forensic radiology. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Offiah A, van Rijin RR, Perez-Rossello JM, Kleinman PK (2009) Skeletal imaging of child abuse. Pediatric Radiol 39(5):461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hobbs CJ, Bilo RA (2009) Nonaccidental trauma: clinical aspects and epidemiology of child abuse. Pediatr Radiol 39(5):457–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Rijin RR (2009) How should we image skeletal injuries in child abuse? Pediatr Radiol 39(suppl 2):S226–S229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American College of Radiology Practice guideline for skeletal surveys in children. Revised 2006. Accessed 16 Nov 2009
  6. 6.
    Kudlad M, Odle T, Kisner L (2010) The state of forensic radiography in the United States. American Society of Radiologic Technologists, Albuquerque, NMGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Di Pietro MA et al (2009) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. Pediatrics 123(5):1430–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    American College of Radiology (2014) Putting together the pieces: radiologists sometimes hold the key to diagnosing inter-partner violence, but are they watching for the signs?
  9. 9.
    Lee NG (2001) Forensic in emergency care. In: Lee NG (ed) Legal concepts and issues in emergency care. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, pp 102–115Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wong NZ, Rosen T, Sanchez AM, Bloemen EM, Mennit KW, Hentel K, Nicola R, Murphy KJ, LoFaso VM, Flomenbaum NE, Lachs MS (2017) Imaging findings in elder abuse: a role for radiologists in detection. Can Assoc Radiol J 68:16–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy K, Waa S, Jaffer H, Sauter A, Chan A (2013) A literature review of findings in physical elder abuse. Can Assoc Radiol J 64:10–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hagan IG, Burney K (2007) Radiology of recreational drug abuse. Radiographics 27(4):919–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reginelli A, Russo A, Urraro F, Maresca D, Martiniello C, D’Andrea A, Brunese L, Pinto A (2015) Imaging of body packing: errors and medico-legal issues. Abdom Imaging 40:2127–2142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khan FY (2005) The cocaine “body-packer” syndrome: diagnosis and treatment. Indian J Med Sci 59(10):457–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wetly CV, Mittleman RE (1981) The “body packer syndrome”-toxicity following ingestion of illecit drugs packaged for transposition. J Forensic Sci 26(3):492–500Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arena JM (1979) Positioning: toxicology, symptoms, treatment, 4th edn. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, ILGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kulkarni VM, Gandhi JA, Gupta RA et al (2012) Body packer syndrome. J Postgrad Med 69:225–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sica G, Guida F, Bocchini G et al (2015) Imaging of drug smuggling by body packing. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 36(1):39–47. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marc B, Baud FJ, Aelion MJ et al (1990) The cocaine body-packer syndrome: evaluation of a method of contrast study of the bowel. J Forensic Sci 35(2):345–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wackerle B, Rupp N, Clarmann M et al (1986) Demonstration of narcotic packages in “body packers” by various imaging methods. In vitro and in vivo investigations. Fortschr Roentgenstr 145:274–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    de Vries CS, Africa M, Gebremariam FA, van Rensburg JJ, Otto SF, Potgieter HF (2010) The imaging of stab injuries. Acta Radiol 51:92–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reginelli A, Pinto A, Russo A, Fontanella G, Rossi C, Del Prete A, Zappia M, D’Andrea A, Guglielmi G, Brunese L (2015) Sharp penetrating wounds: spectrum of imaging findings and legal aspects in the emergency settings. Radiol Med 120:856–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hijiaz TA, Cento EA, Walker MT (2011) Imaging of head trauma. Radiol Clin N Am 49:81–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schatz DV, de la Pedraja J, Erbella J, Hameed M, Vail SJ (2000) Efficacy of follow-up evaluation in penetrating thoracic injuries. J Emerg Med 20:281–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Trupka A, Waydhas C, Hallfeldt KK, Nast-Kolb D, Pfeifer KJ, Schweiberer L (1997) Value of computed thoracic tomography in the first assessment of severely injured patient with blunt chest trauma: results of a prospective study. J Trauma 29:502–509Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Demetiades D, van der Veen BW (1983) Penetrating injuries to the heart: experience over two years in South Africa. J Trauma 23:1034–1041Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reginelli A, Russo A, Maresca D, Mertiniello C, Cappabianca S, Brunese L (2014) Imaging assessment of gunshot wounds. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 36:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Maiden N (2009) Ballistic review. Mechanism of bullet wound trauma. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 5(3):204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nchimi J, Szapiro D, Ghaye B et al (2005) Helical CT of blunt diaphragm rupture. Am J Roentgenol 184:24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Navarro J, Cuesta J, Alaron J et al (2008) Traumatic rupture of the diaphragm. Arch Bronconeumol 44:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cirillo M, Caranci F, Tortora F, Corvino F, Pezzullo F, Conforti R, Cirillo S (2012) Structural neuroimaging in dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 29(suppl 1):16–19. Scholar
  32. 32.
    Caranci F, Tedeschi E, Leone G, Reginelli A, Gatta G, Pinto A, Squillaci E, Briganti F, Brunese L (2015) Errors in neuroradiology. Radiol Med 120(9):795–801. Scholar
  33. 33.
    Muccio CF, Di Blasi A, Esposito G, Brunese L, D’Arco F, Caranci F (2013) Perfusion and spectroscopy magnetic resonance imaging in a case of lymphocytic vasculitis mimicking brain tumor. Pol J Radiol 78(3):66–69. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfonso Reginelli
    • 1
  • Anna Russo
    • 1
  • Elisa Micheletti
    • 1
  • Roberto Picascia
    • 1
  • Antonio Pinto
    • 2
  • Sabrina Giovine
    • 3
  • Salvatore Cappabianca
    • 1
  • Roberto Grassi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Internal and Experimental MedicineUniversity of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”NaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyCardarelli HospitalNaplesItaly
  3. 3.Department of RadiologySG Moscati HospitalAversaItaly

Personalised recommendations