Advertisement

Bioethical Aspects of Postmortem Imaging

  • Luciano SestaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

After a general overview of death in current medical-cultural context, this chapter examines the main moral aspects of postmortem imaging (PI). In the current debate the stressed ethical issues are fundamentally the following: (1) the noninvasive character of postmortem imaging that very likely makes the procedure less objectionable to relatives of the deceased; (2) the reliability of the methods that ought to be as effective as traditional autopsy, both when PI precedes and completes or substitutes traditional autopsy; and (3) the cost-benefit analysis, in individual and social terms. The chapter emphasizes the common prerequisite of these ethical aspects, that is, the corpse’s dignity and, consequently, the duty to find the procedure that could ensure in a better way such dignity. Furthermore, another ethical issue concerns the relationship between physicians and the relatives in front of the tragic event of death itself. Finally, the chapter deals with the case of pediatric postmortem examination as the paradigmatic example of all ethical issues about PI.

Keywords

Death Postmortem imaging Noninvasive diagnosis Autopsy Corpse’s dignity Justice Truth Pity 

Further Reading

  1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2001) Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Burton JL (2005) A bite into the history of the autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 1:277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ciaffi R, Gibelli D, Cattaneo C (2011) Forensic radiology and personal identification of unidentified bodies: a review. Radiol Med 116(6):960–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dirnhofer R, Jackowski C, Vock P, Potter K, Thali MJ (2006) Virtopsy: minimally invasive, imaging guided virtual autopsy. Radiographics 26:1305–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ham C (1999) Tragic choices in health care: lessons from the Child B case. Br Med J 319:1258–1261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hayakawa M, Yamamoto S, Motani H, Yajima D, Sato Y, Iwase H (2006) Does imaging technology overcome problems of conventional postmortem examination? A trial of computed tomography imaging for postmortem examination. Int J Legal Med 120:24–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Illich I (1974) The political uses of natural death. Hastings Center Stud 2(1):3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jalalzadeh H, Giannakopoulos GF, Berger FH, Fronczek J, van de Goot FR, Reijnders UJ, Zuidema WP (2015) Post-mortem imaging compared with autopsy in trauma victims—a systematic review. Forensic Sci Int 257:29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Judge-Kronis L et al (2016) Consent for paediatric and perinatal postmortem investigations: implications of less invasive autopsy. J Forensic Radiol Imaging 4:7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kumar P, Taxy J, Angst DB, Mangurten HH (1998) Autopsies in children: are they still useful? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 152:558–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Loughrey MB, McCluggage WG, Toner PG (2000) The declining autopsy rate and clinicians’ attitudes. Ulster Med J 69:83–89PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Oyake Y, Aoki T, Shiotani S, Kohno M, Ohashi N, Akutsu H, Yamazaki K (2006) Postmortem computed tomography for detecting causes of sudden death in infants and children: retrospective review of cases. Radiat Med 24:493–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Quigley CH (1996) The corpse. A history. McFarland, Jefferson-LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Roulson J, Benbow EW, Hasleton PS (2005) Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of postmortem histology: a meta-analysis and review. Histopathology 47:551–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Serraino S, Scopellitti L et al (2016) Ruolo dell’imaging TC nella valutazione post-mortem dei soggetti deceduti per caduta da altezze elevate: nostra esperienza. G Ital Radiol Med 3:58–64Google Scholar
  16. Sesta L, Argo A (2018) Damnatio memoriae? Migranti, giustizia e medicina legale. Riv Ital Med Leg 2:869–879Google Scholar
  17. Stawicki SP, Gracias VH, Schrag SP, Martin ND, Dean AJ, Hoey BA (2008) The dead continue to teach the living: examining the role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the setting of postmortem examinations. J Surg Educ 65:200–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stawicki PS, Aggrawal A, Dean AJ et al (2008) Postmortem use of advanced imaging techniques: is autopsy going digital? Scientist 2(4):17–26Google Scholar
  19. Thali MJ, Jackowski C, Oesterhelweg L, Ross SG, Dirnhofer R (2007) Virtopsy—the Swiss virtual autopsy approach. Legal Med 9:100–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Sciences (1978) The Belmont Report. Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, Dhew Publication No. (OS) 78-0012, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Underwood J (2012) Post-mortem imaging and autopsy: rivals or allies? Lancet 379:100–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Health Promotion, Maternal and Child Care “G.D’Alessandro”University of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations