Advertisement

CityScope: A Data-Driven Interactive Simulation Tool for Urban Design. Use Case Volpe

  • Luis Alonso
  • Yan Ryan Zhang
  • Arnaud Grignard
  • Ariel Noyman
  • Yasushi Sakai
  • Markus ElKatsha
  • Ronan Doorley
  • Kent Larson
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

MIT City Science Group (CS) studies the interaction of social, economic and physical characteristics of urban areas to understand how people use and experience cities with the goal of improving urban design practices to facilitate consensus between stakeholders. Long-established processes of engagement around urban transformation have been reliant on visual communication and complex negotiation to facilitate coordination between stakeholders, including community members, administrative bodies and technical professionals. City Science group proposes a novel methodology of interaction and collaboration called CityScope, a data-driven platform that simulates the impacts of interventions on urban ecosystems prior to detail-design and execution. As stakeholders collectively interact with the platform and understand the impact of proposed interventions in real-time, consensus building and optimization of goals can be achieved. In this article, we outline the methodology behind the basic analysis and visualization elements of the tool and the tangible user interface, to demonstrate an alternate solution to urban design strategies as applied to the Volpe Site case study in Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA.

References

  1. 1.
    Day, M.: Rhino grasshopper (2009). Accessed 30 June 2014Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferrão, P., Fernández, J.E.: Sustainable Urban Metabolism. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fuller, M., Moore, R.: The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Macat Library (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grignard, A., et al.: Simulate the impact of the new mobility modes in a city using ABM. In: ICCS 2018 (To be published) (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grignard, A., Macià, N., Alonso Pastor, L., Noyman, A., Zhang, Y., Larson, K.: Cityscope andorra: a multi-level interactive and tangible agent-based visualization (extended abstract). In: AAMAS 2018 (To be Published) (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grignard, A., Taillandier, P., Gaudou, B., Vo, D.A., Huynh, N.Q., Drogoul, A.: GAMA 1.6: advancing the art of complex agent-based modeling and simulation. In: International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 117–131. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hawley, A.H.: Population density and the city. Demography 9(4), 521–529 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ishii, H., et al.: Augmented urban planning workbench: overlaying drawings, physical models and digital simulation. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, p. 203. IEEE Computer Society (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishii, H., Ratti, C., Piper, B., Wang, Y., Biderman, A., Ben-Joseph, E.: Bringing clay and sand into digital design–continuous tangible user interfaces. BT Technol. J. 22(4), 287–299 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Katz, B., Wagner, J.: The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America. Brookings Institution, Washington (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kemeny, T.: Immigrant diversity and economic development in cities: a critical review (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Larson, K.: Louis I. Kahn: Unbuilt Masterworks. Monacelli Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montgomery, J.: Editorial Urban Vitality and the Culture of Cities (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noyman, A.: POWERSTRUCTURES: the form of urban regulations. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Noyman, A., Holtz, T., Kröger, J., Noennig, J.R., Larson, K.: Finding places: HCI platform for public participation in refugees’ accommodation process. Procedia Comput. Sci. 112, 2463–2472 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Noyman, A., Sakai, Y., Larson, K.: Cityscopear: urban design and crowdsourced engagement platform. In: CHI 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (To be Published) (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patterson, M.G.: What is energy efficiency?: concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy Policy 24(5), 377–390 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sevtsuk, A., Kalvo, R., Ekmekci, O.: Pedestrian accessibility in grid layouts: the role of block, plot and street dimensions. Urban Morphol. 20(2), 89–106 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Underkoffler, J.: A view from the luminous room. Pers. Technol. 1(2), 49–59 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Westerink, J., Haase, D., Bauer, A., Ravetz, J., Jarrige, F., Aalbers, C.B.: Dealing with sustainability trade-offs of the compact city in peri-urban planning across European city regions. Eur. Plann. Stud. 21(4), 473–497 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang, Y.: CityMatrix - An Urban Decision Support System Augmented by Artificial Intelligence. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luis Alonso
    • 1
  • Yan Ryan Zhang
    • 1
  • Arnaud Grignard
    • 1
  • Ariel Noyman
    • 1
  • Yasushi Sakai
    • 1
  • Markus ElKatsha
    • 1
  • Ronan Doorley
    • 1
  • Kent Larson
    • 1
  1. 1.MIT Media Lab - City Science GroupCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations