Advertisement

A Classical Liberal Approach to Privacy

  • Chris Berg
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism book series (PASTCL)

Abstract

This chapter presents a classical liberal approach to understanding privacy. There are a near infinite array of definitions and approaches to privacy, beginning with Alan Westin’s information control theory. The chapter briefly surveys some of the critiques of Westin’s approach and presents an ‘information exchange’ model, where control over personal information is analogized to property rights. Unwanted privacy violations can be considered the expropriation of economically valuable information. The chapter then explores the range of institutional possibilities available to control these expropriations using the institutional possibility frontier framework.

Bibliography

  1. Allen, Anita. “Coercing Privacy.” William and Mary Law Review 40 (1998): 723–57.Google Scholar
  2. ———. Uneasy Access: Privacy for Women in a Free Society. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1988.Google Scholar
  3. ———. Unpopular Privacy: What Must We Hide? Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, Darcy W.E., and Chris Berg. “Subjective Political Economy.” New Perspectives on Political Economy 13, no. 1–2 (2017): 19–40.Google Scholar
  5. Allen, Darcy W.E., Chris Berg, Aaron M. Lane, and Jason Potts. “The Economics of Crypto-Democracy.” (2017).Google Scholar
  6. Austin, Lisa M. “Enough About Me: Why Privacy is About Power, Not Consent (or Harm).” In A World without Privacy: What Law Can and Should Do?, edited by Austin Sarat, 131–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  7. Berg, Chris. “Regulation and Red Tape in a Small Open Economy.” In Australia’s Red Tape Crisis: The Causes and Costs of over-Regulation, edited by Darcy WE Allen and Chris Berg. Brisbane, QLD: Connor Court Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar
  8. Berg, Chris, Sinclair Davidson, and Jason Potts. “Some Public Economics of Blockchain Technology.” SSRN, 2018a.Google Scholar
  9. ———. “What Does the Blockchain Mean for the Government?: Cryptocurrencies in the Australian Payments System.” Australian Taxpayers’ Alliance, 2018b.Google Scholar
  10. Bjørnskov, Christian. “Economic Freedom and Economic Crisis.” In IFN Working Paper, 2015.Google Scholar
  11. Braithwaite, John. “The Essence of Responsive Regulation.” University of British Columbia Law Review 44 (2011): 475–520.Google Scholar
  12. Brennan, Jason, and Peter M. Jaworski. Markets without Limits: Moral Virtues and Commercial Interests. New York and London: Taylor & Francis, 2015.Google Scholar
  13. Bruynseels, Koen, and Jeroen van den Hoven. “How to Do Things with Personal Big Biodata.” In Social Dimensions of Privacy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Beate Roessler and Dorota Mokrosinska, 122–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  14. Buchanan, James M. “Politics and Meddlesome Preferences.” In Smoking and Society: Toward a More Balanced Assessment, edited by Robert Tollison, 335–42. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1986.Google Scholar
  15. Constine, Josh. “Facebook is Shutting Down Its API for Giving Your Friends’ Data to Apps.” TechCrunch, 29 April 2015.Google Scholar
  16. Davidson, Sinclair. “Environmental Protest: An Economics of Regulation Approach.” Australian Environment Review 29, no. 10 (2014): 283–86.Google Scholar
  17. ———. “Productivity Enhancing Regulatory Reform.” In Australia Adjusting: Optimising National Prosperity, 2013.Google Scholar
  18. ———. “Submission to Parliamentary Joint Committee on Law Enforcement Inquiry into Illicit Tobacco.” 2016.Google Scholar
  19. Davidson, Sinclair, and Jason Potts. “A New Institutional Approach to Innovation Policy.” Australian Economic Review 49, no. 2 (2016): 200–07.Google Scholar
  20. ———. “Social Costs and the Institutions of Innovation Policy.” (2015).Google Scholar
  21. DeCew, Judith Wagner. In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  22. Djankov, Simeon, Edward Glaeser, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. “The New Comparative Economics.” Journal of Comparative Economics 31, no. 4 (2003): 595–619.Google Scholar
  23. Fairfield, Joshua A.T., and Christoph Engel. “Privacy as a Public Good.” Duke Law Journal 65, no. 3 (2015): 385–457.Google Scholar
  24. Fried, Charles. “Privacy [a Moral Analysis].” In Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, edited by Ferdinand D. Schoeman, 203–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  25. Gavison, Ruth E. “Privacy and the Limits of Law.” Yale Law Journal 89 (1980): 421–71.Google Scholar
  26. Gennaioli, Nicola, and Andrei Shleifer. “Judicial Fact Discretion.” In The Failure of Judges and the Rise of Regulators, edited by Andrei Shleifer, 23–52. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012.Google Scholar
  27. Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  28. Harford, Tim. The Undercover Economist. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  29. Hart, Oliver. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  30. Hayek, Friedrich A. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35, no. 4 (1945): 519–530.Google Scholar
  31. Inness, Julie C. Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  32. Lane, Aaron. “Institutions of Public Education.” SSRN, 2017.Google Scholar
  33. Merton, Robert King. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar
  34. Moore, Adam. “Privacy: Its Meaning and Value.” American Philosophical Quarterly 40, no. 3 (2003): 215–27.Google Scholar
  35. Nissenbaum, Helen. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books, 2010.Google Scholar
  36. Olson, Parmy, and Aaron Tilley. “The Quantified Other: Nest and Fitbit Chase a Lucrative Side Business.” Forbes, 5 May 2014.Google Scholar
  37. Parent, William. “Privacy, Morality, and the Law.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 12, no. 4 (1983): 269–88.Google Scholar
  38. Regan, Priscilla M. Legislating Privacy: Technology, Social Values, and Public Policy. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  39. ———. “Privacy and the Common Good: Revisited.” In Social Dimensions of Privacy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Beate Roessler and Dorota Mokrosinska, 50–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  40. Reiman, Jeffrey H. “Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood.” In Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy, edited by Ferdinand Schoeman, 300–16: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  41. Robertson, Dennis H. The Control of Industry. London: Pitman Publishing Corporation, 1923.Google Scholar
  42. Roessler, Beate. “Should Personal Data Be a Tradable Good? On the Moral Limits of Markets in Privacy.” In Social Dimensions of Privacy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Beate Roessler and Dorota Mokrosinska, 141–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  43. Sappington, David. “Optimal Regulation of a Multiproduct Monopoly with Unknown Technological Capabilities.” The Bell Journal of Economics 14 (1983): 453–63.Google Scholar
  44. Schauer, Frederick, and Richard Zeckhauser. “The Trouble with Cases.” In Regulation Vs. Litigation: Perspectives from Economics and Law, edited by Daniel P. Kessler, 27–44. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
  45. Shleifer, Andrei. The Failure of Judges and the Rise of Regulators. Walras-Pareto Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  46. Spacks, Patricia Meyer. Privacy: Concealing the Eighteenth-Century Self. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  47. Stigler, George J. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (1971): 3–21.Google Scholar
  48. Swan, Melanie. “The Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery.” Big Data 1, no. 2 (2013): 85–99.Google Scholar
  49. ———. “Sensor Mania! The Internet of Things, Wearable Computing, Objective Metrics, and the Quantified Self 2.0.” Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks 1, no. 3 (2012): 217–53.Google Scholar
  50. Tabarrok, Alex. “The Facebook Trials: It’s Not “Our” Data.” In Marginal Revolution, 2018.Google Scholar
  51. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  52. Thomson, Judith Jarvis. “The Right to Privacy.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 4 (1975): 295–314.Google Scholar
  53. Westin, Alan F. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum, 1967.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Berg
    • 1
  1. 1.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations