Advertisement

Economics, Economic History and Historical Data

  • Vincent J. Geloso
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Economic History book series (PEHS)

Abstract

There has been no progress in the modest interest in economic history in the top five economics journals since the 1970s. This is despite an apparent newfound enthusiasm for the field among economists. This chapter explains this contradiction by highlighting the differences between research in economic history and economics that exploits historical data. In so doing, the author defines what, in his view, constitutes good economic history research.

JEL Classification

A11 A12 N01 

Reading List

  1. Abramitzky, Ran. 2015. Economics and the Modern Economic Historian. The Journal of Economic History 75 (4): 1240–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. 2001. The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review 91 (5): 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akerlof, George. 1970. The Market for Lemons. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3): 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albouy, David Y. 2012. The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Comment. American Economic Review 102 (6): 3059–3076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Altman, Morris. 2003. Staple Theory and Exportled Growth: Constructing Differential Growth. Australian Economic History Review 43 (3): 230–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arsenault Morin, Alex, Vincent Geloso, and Vadim Kufenko. 2017. The Heights of French-Canadian Convicts, 1780s–1820s. Economics & Human Biology 26: 126–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolt, Jutta, Robert Inklaar, Herman de Jong, and Jan Luiten van Zanden. 2018. Rebasing ‘Maddison’: New Income Comparisons and the Shape of Long-run Economic Development. Groningen Growth and Development Centre Research Memorandum, Paper No. 174.Google Scholar
  8. Bond, Eric W. 1982. A Direct Test of the Lemons’ Model: The Market for Used Pickup Trucks. American Economic Review 72 (4): 836–840.Google Scholar
  9. Broadberry, Stephen, Johann Custodis, and Bishnupriya Gupta. 2015. India and the Great Divergence: An Anglo-Indian Comparison of GDP per Capita, 1600–1871. Explorations in Economic History 55: 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Card, David, and Stefano Della Vigna. 2013. Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 51 (1): 144–161.Google Scholar
  11. Cranfield, John, and Kris Inwood. 2007. The Great Transformation: A Long-run Perspective on Physical Well-being in Canada. Economics & Human Biology 5 (2): 204–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Figueiredo, Rui J.P., Jr., Jack Rakove, and Barry R. Weingast. 2006. Rationality, Inaccurate Mental Models, and Self-confirming Equilibrium: A New Understanding of the American Revolution. Journal of Theoretical Politics 18 (4): 384–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de Vries, Jan. 2017. Changing the Narrative: The New History That was and is to Come. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 48 (3): 313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geloso, Vincent. 2018. British Public Debt, the Acadian Expulsion and the American Revolution. In Public Choice Analyses of American Economic History, ed. J. Hall and M. Witcher. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. ———. forthcoming. Measuring Away the Importance of Institutions: The Case of Seigneurial Tenure and Agricultural Output in Canada East, 1851. Social Science Quarterly.Google Scholar
  16. Geloso, Vincent, Michael Hinton, and Vadim Kufenko. 2017. The Equally “Bad” French and English Farmers of Quebec: New TFP Measures from the 1831 Census. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History 50 (3): 170–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geloso, Vincent, and Alexis Lacombe. 2016. Why was Flour of Poor Quality? The Impact of Seigneurial Laws and Price Controls on Flour in Quebec during the Colonial Era. Agricultural History Review 64 (2): 181–195.Google Scholar
  18. Greene, Jack P. 2000. The American Revolution. American Historical Review 105 (1): 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jerven, Morten. 2013. Poor Numbers: How We are Misled by African Development Statistics and What to Do About It. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lindert, Peter H., and Jeffery G. Williamson. 2016. Unequal Gains: American Growth and Inequality Since 1700. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. McInnis, R. 1981. Some Pitfalls in the 1851–1852 Census of Agriculture of Lower Canada. Histoire Sociale/Social History 14 (27): 219–231.Google Scholar
  22. von Mises, Ludwig. (1957) 2006. Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution. Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  23. Ouellet, Fernand. 1980. Lower Canada 1791–1840: Social Change & Nationalism. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart.Google Scholar
  24. Rabushka, Alvin. 2010. Taxation in Colonial America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rakove, Jack., A. Rutten, and B. Weingast 2000. Ideas, Interest, and Credible Commitments in the American Revolution. Working Paper, Hoover Institution, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent J. Geloso
    • 1
  1. 1.Bates CollegeLewistonUSA

Personalised recommendations